Ferdville,
That's a good explanation and I understand where you're coming from.
I think that we're thinking pretty similarly, but kind of approaching it from a slightly different angle.
You seem to believe that although Bush has gotten us into this mess, yet offers no solution of his own, that we should stick with him because the opposition also offers no solutions.
My point of view is that we should vote to fire the person who has proven to have severe lapses in judgment that will cost this country in every way for years to come. This despite Kerry not having a miracle solution. If Kerry inherits Bush's mess, we can't expect an immediate, clean solution as there really isn't one.
My view is that Kerry can't make any worse decisions for this country in regards to Iraq, fighting terrorism, reckless spending, etc. How could he?
I also don't buy the party line that because there hasn't been an attack on our soil in 3 years, that that means he is keeping us safe. If one believes that, then they also must assign blame to him for 9/11. IMO, neither is accurate.
That's a good explanation and I understand where you're coming from.
I think that we're thinking pretty similarly, but kind of approaching it from a slightly different angle.
You seem to believe that although Bush has gotten us into this mess, yet offers no solution of his own, that we should stick with him because the opposition also offers no solutions.
My point of view is that we should vote to fire the person who has proven to have severe lapses in judgment that will cost this country in every way for years to come. This despite Kerry not having a miracle solution. If Kerry inherits Bush's mess, we can't expect an immediate, clean solution as there really isn't one.
My view is that Kerry can't make any worse decisions for this country in regards to Iraq, fighting terrorism, reckless spending, etc. How could he?
I also don't buy the party line that because there hasn't been an attack on our soil in 3 years, that that means he is keeping us safe. If one believes that, then they also must assign blame to him for 9/11. IMO, neither is accurate.