not arguing that in the least
i am talking about his swing and that is the criticism of his "naysayers"
he and Jack are the greatest competitors in the history of the game no doubt about it
Tiger has the chance to be better than Jack because his swing was once much better
He also will have problems at the other 3 majors the way he is swinging the club
His US Open in 2000 form was in no comparison to what it is now
Sure he hit a good 3 wood there....20% of the time hitting good shots is in no comparison to his 90% of years past
That is what many correctly say, and unless you are completely oblivious, you will agree
Tiger was winning more than half of the majors...he is nowhere near that mark right now and it is because of one thing -- his swing
i am talking about his swing and that is the criticism of his "naysayers"
he and Jack are the greatest competitors in the history of the game no doubt about it
Tiger has the chance to be better than Jack because his swing was once much better
He also will have problems at the other 3 majors the way he is swinging the club
His US Open in 2000 form was in no comparison to what it is now
Sure he hit a good 3 wood there....20% of the time hitting good shots is in no comparison to his 90% of years past
That is what many correctly say, and unless you are completely oblivious, you will agree
Tiger was winning more than half of the majors...he is nowhere near that mark right now and it is because of one thing -- his swing