For what its worth

McVegas

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 14, 2003
828
2
0
NJ/FLA
I usually track the results of teams playing on the 2nd night of back to back games. Right now a slow start at 11-9 and +$20 (with $100 as a standard play) this may not play out well this year due to the elimination of ties and the resulting $$ lines being higher than usual. HOWEVER, I have found that betting the UNDER on the 2nd night is off to an incredible start, 15-5 +$1035. Please note that I DO NOT include games in which BOTH teams played the previous night, only when one team has played. Now that I posted this, it will probably go down the toilet. Good luck to all.
 

kickserv

Wrong Forum Mod
Forum Member
Top Poster Of Month
May 26, 2002
91,173
1,704
113
50
Canada
good info...........although I will never bet under in the NHL now....no way.......well ok never say never....but ya know what I mean...LOL!
 

McVegas

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 14, 2003
828
2
0
NJ/FLA
I am going to update this once a week (with Sunday being the end of the week) and see how it plays out for the season. Unders now at 40-24-3 +1470. Six weeks into the season and the unders have only had 2 losing weeks. I for one am surprised at this, with all the power play and OT/shootout goals being scored I thought the overs would be making a comeback. Good luck to all.
 

McVegas

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 14, 2003
828
2
0
NJ/FLA
Have not played all of them, Don't have the bankroll (or balls!!) to bet them all and I rarely play $100, usually $50 a play for me ($100 a play is easier to use for tracking purposes). Was going to play last nights under until I saw that Vegaskiller had the over, so I tailed him instead. I will NOT bet against Vegaskiller, I have seen what he can do!! Tonight's play would be under 6 1/2 even in the TB/WAS game, but WAS just sucks ass so I'm not sure if I'll play this one. Good luck to all.
 
Last edited:

tmlfan4ever

BleedsBlue
Forum Member
Oct 25, 2005
280
0
0
Toronto, Canada
Its possible that vegas is doing a good job adjusting because league wide scoring is indeed up. My guess is that the over/under lines have just moved to adjust. But still, great info... very interested to see how this develops.
 

McVegas

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 14, 2003
828
2
0
NJ/FLA
It's true that scoring is up across the NHL and if the books move the lines up that just helps us even more. Some of these lines were at 5 1/2 and they still went under, thats the part that confuses me. You'd think the over would be the play at 5 1/2, I mean 6 goals in the "NEW NHL", should be easy, right? Isn't that what Gary Bettman (douchebag) wants? Anyway here is the breakdown by the week. Week 1 +330 , Week 2 +705, Week 3 -185, Week 4 +100, Week 5 +555, Week 6 -35. Good luck to all.
 

njdboy

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 19, 2005
1,420
2
0
Bay Area
bumping this cause I am going to test this out tonight, and play the 3 unders that would fall under this "system":

EDMONTON/DETROIT u6?-120 (2 units)
LOS ANGELES/VANCOUVER u6+110 (2 units)
TAMPA BAY/NYI u6?-110 (2 units)
 

njdboy

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 19, 2005
1,420
2
0
Bay Area
seems like whenever I try a new theory it doesn't pan out well for me. I guess this is more of a long term gain sort of play though. I will monitor it some more.
 

McVegas

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 14, 2003
828
2
0
NJ/FLA
The unders took an ass kicking last week 3-10 for a minus $765. Season now stands at 43-34-3 +$705.
 

McVegas

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 14, 2003
828
2
0
NJ/FLA
Nas/LA under and SJ/Van under would be the plays. Nas/La just blew the push in the final minute. Hope the other one hits or it could be time to start fading this.
 

McVegas

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 14, 2003
828
2
0
NJ/FLA
Unders got off to a great start and then faded last week, finishing at 6-5-1 +$30. Season now at 55-44-5 +$790. Looks like the books caught on and now we are just treading water here, still..... I wil continue to update for the season. Good luck to all.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top