gman2 said:scott:
im not saying i agree with you calling the bet off.
im just saying youre not entirely wrong for being pissed about gable.
hell i bet villanova the other night and allen ray didnt end up playing and the cats damn near lost to sorry ass south florida. i couldnt call pinnacle back and ask for a refund though. you just gotta bite your tongue and accept the circumstance.
While this is certainly a novel and witty idea (I think Sun is witty. Dark, but witty) I have believe that Scooter probably has many uses for this memorabilia and frankly, Ihave no use for used sweaty athletic undergarments from the losing team. Thanks anyway Sun, but I respectfully decline the compromise. I will only settle for the hat . . . . . and maybe a picture of Scooter wearing it.Sun Tzu said:Cant we compromise and Scott just send Judge one of those jockstraps he saved from the locker room, along with maybe the USC secret to preventing cramps?
gman2 said:scott:
you're not completely wrong (gable's position switch is screwy) ... but the fact that usc didn't sign any of the other 3 guys should be enough for you to call it a loss.
if they were heavily recruiting 6 kids at the position, and they only end up with 2 true running backs, i think you might have to chalk it up as an L. if they could have gotten ANY of those other 3 to make up for gable, then you'd have been in good shape. but apparently that's not happening.
obviously a lot of guys are just waiting for one misstep on your end so they can blast you to no end.
if the bet was stricly between the first three guys you were talking about, i think you would have a lot more of an argument.
but unless those other guys sign at usc (the other 3 you're talking about) you're on the wrong side of this one
SixFive said:Is it requisite that all Madjacksports.com members who are USC alums be the most arrogant, condescending people in cyberspace?
The Judge said:Scooter, this thread appears to have taken on a life of its own and I can not say that this was not my original intention. However, I encourage you to ignore the haters as this is strickly between you and me, kid.
BahamaMama said:ya might wanna reread what judge said Scott. (pay close attention to something similar to a double negative)![]()
Scott4USC said:BULL$HIT! Otherwise you would not have made a separate post in the General Forum.
BahamaMama said:in which case... exactly what part of what he said were you replying to here?
Originally Posted by The Judge
Scooter, this thread appears to have taken on a life of its own and I can not say that this was not my original intention. However, I encourage you to ignore the haters as this is strickly between you and me, kid.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.