Resolution with my bet with Judge........

saint

Go Heels
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
9,501
140
63
Balls Deep
kosar said:
That's an 'interesting' clause. :mj07: :mj07:


This get's better and better every post. I missed that clause. Can't you see the number of 'new' members from scotts IP. I mean, we've got mom, dad, sis, fluffy. That's four votes right there!
 

bjfinste

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 14, 2001
5,462
18
0
AZ
I'm just glad this is a Saturday and I'm just watching basketball so I can admire this train wreck as the day goes along.
 

The Judge

Pura Vida!
Forum Member
Aug 5, 2004
4,909
29
0
SJO
I got your email Scott which included an offer to simply send me $20 and let me pick out my own hat or have a nice meal. Thank you for that but actually, I prefer that you purchase the hat for me and mail it to the address that I will send you.

The hat can be found here: My favorite hat store

I'll take the one on the left hand side of the second row. I am sure this website will appreciate your patronage and be sure to tell a few friends about it.

By the way, I never called Scott a welcher.
 

Scott4USC

Fight On!
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2002
5,410
18
38
44
There you go again. Making everything public. You say you wanted things done strictly between you and me but instead of e-mailing me back you post it. :rolleyes:

Is this the one you want............

44383856_F_tn.jpg
 

Wineguy

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 7, 2000
6,983
278
83
Atlanta, GA
Isn't he just the guy you'd like to meet in a dark alley and beat the fawk out of? I guarantee, Scott will never arrive at a Madjack function anytime because his life is hiding behind a keyboard like all big talkers. By the way, any of you ATL guys go to the Tabernacle last weekend for the 790 the zone party? It was off the chain...they have another at Cheetah 3 for first 2 rounds of NCAA BB tournament. We should plan a get together. Scottie, I'll be glad to pay your plane ticket here, cause I bet 30k last night that the Brown game would go double overtime, and I won. Are ya man enough?
 

The Judge

Pura Vida!
Forum Member
Aug 5, 2004
4,909
29
0
SJO
Scott4USC said:
There you go again. Making everything public. You say you wanted things done strictly between you and me but instead of e-mailing me back you post it. :rolleyes:

Is this the one you want............

44383856_F_tn.jpg
Yes that is the hat I want. I didn't make this public, you did when you profered the bet on this forum. You invited the abuse you have received when you shamelessly tried to weasel out of the bet and in my opinion, showed your true colors.

Once I have received the hat, I will thank you in an equally public manner and then promptly take the advice you have incessantly given and put you on my ignore list. I will then publicly announce that I have done so and publicly wish you good riddance.
 

saint

Go Heels
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
9,501
140
63
Balls Deep
Scott4USC said:
There you go again. Making everything public. You say you wanted things done strictly between you and me but instead of e-mailing me back you post it. :rolleyes:

Is this the one you want............

44383856_F_tn.jpg


He had already made it public in the post above yours describing where to locate the hat.

God you are dense.
 

Scott4USC

Fight On!
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2002
5,410
18
38
44
homedog said:
No good attention whore. This place is full of them.

How does this make me an attention whore? It was JUDGE who started this in the General Forum. Not me. If I was Judge, I would have posted it in the CFB forum in the threads that the bet was talked about OR privately e-mail me. JUDGE wanted to make this public. He is the attention whore. :mj07:
 

Scott4USC

Fight On!
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2002
5,410
18
38
44
Scott4USC said:
How does this make me an attention whore? It was JUDGE who started this in the General Forum. Not me. If I was Judge, I would have posted it in the CFB forum in the threads that the bet was talked about OR privately e-mail me. JUDGE wanted to make this public. He is the attention whore. :mj07:

MadJack said:

I don't think it makes me the attention whore. So if anyone is going to be accused of being an attention whore, it prob. is the person who makes this issue public to everyone.


Link to BAN Scott4USC Poll.

LINK
 

scott4

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 26, 2004
224
0
0
scott the diff between this and your grandpas spending habits are you chose to bet a hat your grandpa did not choose the cheese. i have to admit i dont care if you go or stay but the threads that you are involved with are funny i enjoy reading them i am still lol at the new poll rules. i bet you were a blast to play a pick up game of ball making rules up as you go along f-cking funny.
 

Scott4USC

Fight On!
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2002
5,410
18
38
44
scott4 said:
scott the diff between this and your grandpas spending habits are you chose to bet a hat your grandpa did not choose the cheese. i have to admit i dont care if you go or stay but the threads that you are involved with are funny i enjoy reading them i am still lol at the new poll rules. i bet you were a blast to play a pick up game of ball making rules up as you go along f-cking funny.

Actually I used to do that ALL the time when playing as kids. Hide go seek, hoops, homerun derby, etc. :mj07: Remember, when playing as kids it was friendly. This was suppose to be a friendly wager. Obviously Judge needs the hat bad and won't sympathize. I understand his argument and will pay up.

I agree there is a difference but I used that analogy because this wasn't about the hat. It was about me being WRONGED and losing the bet because of it. I am used to making friendly wagers in the real world whether it is on golf course or betting with friends who makes first shot in a hoop game etc. When making unique bets, $hit happens and since they are friendly wagers, usually both parties accommodate each other and make it FAIR!

Hopefully you vote me to stay. :)
 

yyz

Under .500
Forum Member
Mar 16, 2000
42,346
1,750
113
On the course!
Scott4USC said:
Scott Atlanta couldn't follow those simple instructions. :s4:


If you could follow "simple instructions", JUDGE would have a hat by now.........

:scared
 

yyz

Under .500
Forum Member
Mar 16, 2000
42,346
1,750
113
On the course!
You know, the more I think about it, the more I think Jack should have a simple standing rule about welchers:


FIRST OFFENSE:


GONE!!!!!!!!!
 

blgstocks

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2005
3,181
12
0
So. Cal
Looks Like Homer4SC is gone. I dont know if CFB forum will ever be the same. Goodbye Scott, some will miss yur controversy, most will miss the laughs, either way isnt it ironic that The moment SC loses Homer4SC is getting banned because he just has gone off the deep end?
 

3 Seconds

Fcuk Frist
Forum Member
Jan 14, 2004
6,706
16
0
Marlton, NJ
blgstocks said:
Looks Like Homer4SC is gone. I dont know if CFB forum will ever be the same. Goodbye Scott, some will miss yur controversy, most will miss the laughs, either way isnt it ironic that The moment SC loses Homer4SC is getting banned because he just has gone off the deep end?


Did he really get banned?
 

tom

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 26, 2000
124
0
0
Scott4USC said:
Actually I used to do that ALL the time when playing as kids. Hide go seek, hoops, homerun derby, etc.

This explains alot.
Man, how everyone hated those brats who would whine and try to change the rules when they were losing.

It looks like this guy has never grown up.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top