Who is Number 1 For 2006?

AU2001

under par
Forum Member
Dec 3, 2004
1,081
6
0
Birmingham AL
DerekNJND said:
Thats why it was ludacris for someone to criticize DD for saying ND had #5 class by citing their class as #8 instead.

Once again, you show your ignorance.

I never criticized Dirty Diapers. I simply corrected his incorrect statement. He said that Notre Dame was ranked #3 on Rivals and they weren't. He made that statement, not me. All I did was correct his mistake. I never said anything about rivals being better than anyone else, but that was the site DD referenced. I never said Notre Dame didn't have a good recruiting class either. Although, I guess it really doesn't matter what types of recruits you get when you don't even beat one ranked team, and still get to go to a BCS bowl only to have it handed to you for the 8th straight time in the past 12 years. 0-8 is it now? That's tough.

All I did was state facts and you got your panties in a wad:

Notre Dame IS ranked #8 on rivals.

Over half their signees are 3* or below on rivals.

But like Sun has told you on many occasions, let's not let facts get in the way...
 

Phenom

STRONG.
Forum Member
May 24, 2001
3,048
13
0
The Upstate
The Tigers got a nice recruiting class, always nice to see them above the Tide. A guy I work with hangs from Clemson's nuts and was pissed that one of guys they were really going after chose Auburn... :thumb:
 

AU2001

under par
Forum Member
Dec 3, 2004
1,081
6
0
Birmingham AL
The Hawthorne kid from Homewood is ridiculous. He will compete for the third receiver spot as a freshman. Very solid class for the Tigers.

That's why it always baffles me why people waste time arguing over recruiting classes or strength of schedule. It makes no sense.
 

DIRTY Diapers

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 13, 2005
2,670
5
0
46
Indianapolis
AU2001 said:
Once again, you show your ignorance.

I never criticized Dirty Diapers. I simply corrected his incorrect statement. He said that Notre Dame was ranked #3 on Rivals and they weren't. He made that statement, not me. All I did was correct his mistake. I never said anything about rivals being better than anyone else, but that was the site DD referenced. I never said Notre Dame didn't have a good recruiting class either. Although, I guess it really doesn't matter what types of recruits you get when you don't even beat one ranked team, and still get to go to a BCS bowl only to have it handed to you for the 8th straight time in the past 12 years. 0-8 is it now? That's tough.

All I did was state facts and you got your panties in a wad:

Notre Dame IS ranked #8 on rivals.

Over half their signees are 3* or below on rivals.

But like Sun has told you on many occasions, let's not let facts get in the way...

Auburn 2001 - ND was ranked #3 by rivals until signing day and they dropped all the way to number 8 for some reason.

ND has NO players coming in according to Rivals BELOW 3 stars. Nice Try. They also have 9 players who were gatorade player of the year for the state. Not Bad...

All in all, it's the best class ND has had in a few years. They average about #5 according to all of the sites.

BTW - They will win a bowl game next year with almost everyone returning. Hopefully, we can match up with Auburn.
 

DoMyDermBest

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 7, 2003
1,728
19
38
Deep in the heart of Texas
Sun,
Nothing short of telling DerrICK that he is the most intelligent, talented, most fortunate individual, blessed to attend the only great U in the world, sired and blessed enough to live in NJ, the only true state in this country might shut him up. Either that or ask Jack to give him his own Thread good for him to post to, and for only him to respond... OK, maybe you could let Scotty in...
 

AU2001

under par
Forum Member
Dec 3, 2004
1,081
6
0
Birmingham AL
DIRTY Diapers said:
ND has NO players coming in according to Rivals BELOW 3 stars. Nice Try.

They have a 2* kicker. haha

I would love to see ND matched up with Auburn in a BCS bowl game next year.
 

blgstocks

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2005
3,181
12
0
So. Cal
AU2001 said:
They have a 2* kicker. haha

I would love to see ND matched up with Auburn in a BCS bowl game next year.
ND matched up against Auburn in a bowl game = 9 straight bowl losses. LOL.
 

ryanmcgwyer

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 6, 2004
1,366
102
63
50
Baton Rouge LA
LSU #1 next year. Now I know I am going to get all kinds of shi_ but there is no disrespect in my pick just some facts. At the beginning of last season LSU lost its best player in running back Alley Broussard, a rare combination of size and speed, Broussard is a game changer. I ask you this if USC didn't have Reggie Bush, or Texas didn't have Young, how good would those teams have been. Texas losing young is huge. The Quarterback is the field general and without that leadership you can't simply expect to repeat, particularly when Young was the entire reason they beat USC. I think strength of schedule plays a critical role in getting to the big game and LSU recenty shook up its schedule. They had a brutal stretch of road games VS. Fla, Tenn and Auburn, they moved the Auburn game up and scheduled Fresno State who will hopefully be ranked and improve LSU's strength of schedule. The longhorns are kind of like Seattle in the NFL they beat up on an unusually weak big 12 and really shocked the world by upsetting the movie star as_hole condoms. Watch out for LSU and West Virginia next season! I think West Virginia has the most underrated team and coaching staff in the country!
 

ryanmcgwyer

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 6, 2004
1,366
102
63
50
Baton Rouge LA
Tough to disrespect ND, did you see the movie Rudy? Great history great program, not my team but they hired the best possible coach avail, and will reap the benefits. I am still pissed they lost to USC after really outplaying them. Next season you guys go down there and get it done beat USC and open the top up for LSU! I really enjoyed the small rivalry we had with Notre Dame several years ago. Any one who hates USC is a friend of mine.
 

DerekNJND

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 21, 2005
2,022
4
0
44
Jersey
AU2001 said:
They have a 2* kicker. haha

I would love to see ND matched up with Auburn in a BCS bowl game next year.

Thats what you said this year. Then they couldnt even handle wisconsin. Pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeease let it go. I dont think Auburn would have scored a point in a BCS bowl this season. Better luck next year
 

DerekNJND

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 21, 2005
2,022
4
0
44
Jersey
The Judge said:
Main Entry: fe?ces
Pronunciation: 'fE-(")sEz
Function: noun plural
Etymology: Middle English, from Latin faec-, faex (singular) dregs
: bodily waste discharged through the anus : EXCREMENT

. . . . . as in incessantly flowing from your mouth.

Please try to keep up, son.

Wow, copying and pasting from a dictionary. I am impressed. Please remind me why you belong in a handicapping forum?

Look at yourself. You actually took the time to define the word "feces". WTF is wrong with you? Get a hold of your life! Whenever you find yourself using words like "anus" and "feces", you've really lost track of things.

Adding "anus" to your reportoire of vocabulary words is not impressing anyone either. I will say this, all this focus on "anal" topics is making me wonder if there is a Mrs. Judge, or perhaps another Mr. Judge. Hey, I'm not knocking you. Lets just say the "alternative" lifestyle is not for me :)
 
Last edited:

DerekNJND

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 21, 2005
2,022
4
0
44
Jersey
AU2001 said:
Once again, you show your ignorance.

I never criticized Dirty Diapers. I simply corrected his incorrect statement. He said that Notre Dame was ranked #3 on Rivals and they weren't. .


You are incorrect once again. If you had your facts straight, this would be easier.

When DD said ND was #3 on rivals, they were in fact #3. Check the date/time of his posting.

AU2001 said:
That's why it always baffles me why people waste time arguing over recruiting classes or strength of schedule. It makes no sense.

Yet you were the one to start the whole debate by "correcting" DD's statements that ND had the #3 class, which was in fact true up until draft day. Actions speak louder than words
 
Last edited:

AU2001

under par
Forum Member
Dec 3, 2004
1,081
6
0
Birmingham AL
DerekNJND said:
Yet you were the one to start the whole debate by "correcting" DD's statements that ND had the #3 class, which was in fact true up until draft day.

Up until draft day huh?

Hey genius, when did colleges start drafting?
 

DerekNJND

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 21, 2005
2,022
4
0
44
Jersey
AU2001 said:
Up until draft day huh?

Hey genius, when did colleges start drafting?

Check the date time Aubrey. It was 4 AM on a saturday night and I was fukkin waaaaaaaaaasted. I meant:

signing day

sorry for the mix up. I assume everyone here is intelligent enough to interpret a simple error. Once again, I have given you too much credit. Forgot I had to walk you through everything.

I'm sure by 4 AM you and your boyfriend were all snuggled up and warm for the night so dont worry about what goes on that late.
 

AU2001

under par
Forum Member
Dec 3, 2004
1,081
6
0
Birmingham AL
DerekNJND said:
Check the date time Aubrey. It was 4 AM on a saturday night and I was fukkin waaaaaaaaaasted. I meant:

signing day

sorry for the mix up. I assume everyone here is intelligent enough to interpret a simple error. Once again, I have given you too much credit. Forgot I had to walk you through everything.

I'm sure by 4 AM you and your boyfriend were all snuggled up and warm for the night so dont worry about what goes on that late.

Sorry, I didn't know you were so cool that you get wasted and talk trash on the internet at 4 am.

Anyway, thanks for clearing up the reason for your idiotic mistake.
 

DerekNJND

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 21, 2005
2,022
4
0
44
Jersey
AU2001 said:
Sorry, I didn't know you were so cool that you get wasted and talk trash on the internet at 4 am.

Anyway, thanks for clearing up the reason for your idiotic mistake.

no problem. I'm in class and bored so I have nothing better to do than translate English for people with special needs. Sorry, but I think its HILARIOUS to come home from the bar and fukk with losers like you when I'm drunk. Immature, yes. Entertaining, yes. Maybe not for you but who cares.

Nobody said I was cool, I was explaining why I made the mistake. But obviously you look up to me and thats a good start for someone as lost as you.

Anyway, good thing you focused on a trivial part of the argument instead of focusing on the MERITS of it, where you were defeated (Again)
 
Last edited:
Bet on MyBookie
Top