Saturday July 28th

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
5,653
26
48
Toronto
Saturday July 28th 2007

July: 130-119 +14.85
ml 71-53 +8.57
rl 9-5 +7.31
totals 28-32 -6.36
parlays 22-29 +5.33
system picks 34-21 in July (62%) (value indicator any+10, +7at60+, +5at65+)
system totals 41-40 in July?finally over .500

system sides

team win% (line)value indicator

(1)Mets 67% (-196)even RL 52 (+116)+5
(2)Mets 55 (-165)-8 wash 45 (+157)+6
(1)mil 54 (+115)+7
(2)mil 63 (-112)+10
atl 60 (-132)+3
Hou 56 (-140)-3
Phil 65 (-146)+5 RL 51 (+136)+8
Cin 55 (-116)+1
Col 59 (Francis-Billingsley)
Col 63 (Francis-Tomko)
Sf 55 (-118)even
Laa 51 (-120)-4
oak 53 (+111)+5
nyy 65 (-171)+1 RL 52 (-109)-1
tor 61 (-125)+5
min 59 (-140)even
Tb 55 (+107)+6
tex 63 (-108)+11 RL 50 (+146)+9

system totals

(1)wash@Mets un8.5 72% (-110)+19 --ump Hallion is even
fla@Sf ov8.5 66 (-125)+10 --ump Kellogg is a slight OVER-ump
min@Clev ov8.5 67 (-120)+12 --Diaz an under-ump past year and a half; pass here
bost@Tb ov10 65 (+111)+17 --ump Wegner is a decent OVER-ump


I can't tell you how much those comments in my Friday post meant to me. Thanks a lot to thisisbad, Riskbreaker, Dr. Whitetail and husky. I have invested a ton of time into these posts since the start of the season, not to mention the amount of time I spend handicapping the games, so it was great to get some support after my crucifiction on Thursday. Truth of the matter was that is really wasn't so bad?I actually lost LESS than I had won the day previous, and only about a third of what I had made the previous 3 days. Still, I let the bad day really affect me; I keep telling myself to "take it like a man" when I'm losing a game, but Thursday I really took it like a small child. Taking a day off was the best thing I could have done?well?maybe not?system sides actually went 11-3 yesterday. I'll take it as a GOOD sign. Hoping to survive the full season, here, so thanks again for the words.

A full 17 games today. Lots of opportunity to get into trouble but I think I'm keeping my risks to under 4 units a game to close out the month. Nothing on this board is a must-have for me (maybe Rangers). Brewers with a shot in both games as the Cards are pathetic against lefties this season (OPS .704) I'm rating Parra about average for this first start, which is similar to my current rating for Thomspon; Brewers have the edge at the plate in both matchups. I might take a shot with Parra but the second game looks tastier as Capuano seems to be in good rhythm lately and the Cards Reyes is about as bad as it gets for an SP. That second game is a system pick at current lines; even if it reaches -125 it's still a system pick. Phillies might manhandle Pitt again as Durbin has been great over his past 2 starts; I think I want a piece of that one. Rangers I'll be all over, as Millwood vs Perez is a mismatch and Rangers do better work vs lefties than righties, too (yesterday's game was no surprise as Bannister has been quite sharp lately). I'm trying to be careful 'capping Jays games, as they're my team, but I think that the call today is justified as Halladay, the past few, has been better than Buehrle and the Jays should have a clear edge at the plate (Jays OPS vs L a whopping .852, second only to the Tigers .869, while the Chisox OPS vs R is .708; it might seem like the Chisox have really turned things around at the plate the past while, but the past 7 days still has the Jays ahead at OPS .800 to the Chisox .758). If this game is decided by the bullpens then the Jays have a solid edge there. A few other sides show a bit of value, but nothing looks great; D'Rays seem to burn me anytime I lay coin on them.

Three totals survived umpire eliminations, but nothing looks great. Mets O is in too much of a zone right now, despite yesterday's poor showing, and Redding might be due to get lit up some. Both Willis and Cain are much better than they've been doing lately, and a solid game from either one likely kills an over there. Bosox-Rays might be the best-looking of them as D'Rays do their best work vs lefties (OPS .810) while the Sox are no slouches at the plate (OPS vs R .793 and tied for 3rd in MLB for runs scored off of righties); both teams have been hot the past week, too, with a 7-day OPS of .836 for the Bosox and .812 for the D'Rays. Lester had a solid game last time out but I think that will be difficult to repeat here; more of a concern for the over would be the possibility of Shields having a good game but he's been mediocre for about 4 starts now and the Bosox have beaten on him before (0-1, era 6.10 in 2 starts; both from last season, both at Tropicana Field).

Going to do my darndest to be careful over the next four days in order to (hopefully) clear 10 units for July. 20 would be better. You never know.

Will post plays eventually.
GL
 
Last edited:

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
5,653
26
48
Toronto
possible team totals
(w/relative system number; - for unders, etc.)

(1)nats un4 -150 (-18)promising but expensive
(1)Cards un5 -140 (-6)very risky
(2)mil ov4.5 -145 (+7)
(2)Cards un4.5 -115 (-9)
D'Backs un4 -115 (-10)
pirates un5 -150 (-8)little riskier than (1)nats
Orioles un4 -115 (-13)O's bats have tanked, lately
Chisox un4.5 -135 (-10)Jays ML looks better
Indians un4 -130 (-5)Santana hasn't thrown a gem for 2 straight; maybe due, but has his work cut out for him here
D'Rays ov5 +105 (+6)need lots off of Lester as Bosox pen rocks
rangers ov4.5 -130 (+11)moneyline again better
Royals un4.5 +100 (-6)same


Nothing here jumps out at me. (1)nats under looks good, but pricey. Rangers over looks good, too, but the moneyline looks much better. Clemens finally had a solid road game last time out and faces an O's team with a .712 OPS the past 7 days (.731 vs R for the year).

Indians under 4 might be worth a shot, but the Twins moneyline isn't much more expensive. Still, Diaz has been a total under-ump this season and Twins have a stellar bullpen if needed.

Might bury some of these on an IF play. Maybe better just to keep to a few simple moneylines today.
 

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
5,653
26
48
Toronto
return on investment breakdown for system picks
---------------------------------------------------------------------
((2)brewers,rangers)
----------------------------------------------------------------------

(2)brewers 63% (-112)+10

FOR:
--Capuano comes in rated much higher than Reyes
--Brewers OPS vs R .747
--Cards OPS vs L .704
--bullpens about even; Cards should need there's more in this one
AGAINST:
--Brewers OPS last 7 days .641
--Cards OPS last 7 days .781
--Cards face a lefty in game #1, too, preparing them a little
--Brewers are not a good road team (21-29) while Cards enjoy one of the better home-field advantages (in years previous, at least; they're only 22-25 at home in '07)

-112 is 89.3 cents on the dollar
63 x 0.893 = 56.259
37 x -1......= -37
---------------------------------
...................19.259%


That's pretty good. If I'm off by 5 or 6% then there's still value to be had here. If I'm off by 10% it's an even proposition.

Brewers likely take at least one today.
I'm hoping it's the nightcap.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

rangers 63% (-108)+11

FOR:
--Millwood comes in rated much higher than Perez
--bullpen edge to Rangers
--Rangers .780 OPS vs lefties
--Royals .711 OPS vs righties
--Rangers OPS last 7 days is .784
--Royals OPS last 7 is .763 (not bad, for them)
--Royals only 22-31 at home (.415)
AGAINST:
--Rangers only bagged 1 in the opener
--Rangers only 19-32 on the road (.373)
--Royals have won 2 straight; 6-4 their past 10

-108 is 92.6 cents on the dollar
63 x 0.926 = 58.338
37 x -1......= -37
----------------------------------
...................21.338%


Obviously that one was going to be higher, as I've given them the same probability but the Rangers are slightly cheaper. I'm making the Rangers my largest play for Saturday. Hopefully Millwood is a little sharper than in his last, vs the M's (still got the W due to great run support).

After a 1-3 for system picks, on Thursday, I'd sure like to bag both of these. If my numbers are anywhere near accurate then there's a 13% chance that they both miss. A 40% chance that they both hit. That leaves a 47% chance that I hit just one, which wouldn't be the end of the world as the juice on these is minimal.

Feeling more confident about the Rangers.
 

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
5,653
26
48
Toronto
And, in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make.

And, in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make.

PLAYS

system picks

(2)brewers -112 2.24/2
rangers -108 3.24/3

other picks

Phillies -146 1.46/1
Jays -125 2.5/2
twins -140 1.4/1

2-teamer
--(1)Mets ml
--Phillies ml
+154
0.64/1

2-teamer
--(1)Mets ml
--yankees ml
+139
0.71/1

15-team IF bet
1.(1)Mets -1.5 0.73/0.77
2.Phillies -1.5 0.5/0.65
3.rangers 0.55/0.5
4.jays 0.75/0.6
5.(2)brewers 0.75/0.6
6.D'Rays 0.62/0.62
7.a's 0.74/0.74
8.(1)brewers 0.8/0.84
9.twins 1.31/0.91
10.nyy -1.5 1.1/1
11.(2)wash@Mets ov9.5 0.9/0.75
12.braves 1.2/0.8
13.Astros 1.2/0.8
14.fla@Sf ov8.5 0.75/0.6
15.Reds 0.75/0.6
0.73 to win max.10.78


That's plenty for me today. Might add the Rockies, especially if it's v. Tomko, but I'll need a reasonable line there (-130 max if v.Tomko and -115 max if v.Billingsley). Of course, I'd like to turn a plus today, but if I lose then I believe that I will accept that fate graciously today. Truth of the matter is that money has never been a high priority for me; it's really not the attraction in my sports wagering; I think I just really like the challenge. I've been a sports fan since I was very young and I guess that I believe that the knowledge that I've gained gives me some kind of edge over the books; experience has taught me, however, that it is very difficult to get an edge over the books. I'll keep trying just the same. The trick, for me, is to learn to focus on the more important things like family and friends; I've got to take this hobby a little less seriously, I think. Live and learn?live and learn.

GL today
 

Riskbreaker

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 19, 2002
1,608
2
0
46
krautland
The trick, for me, is to learn to focus on the more important things like family and friends; I've got to take this hobby a little less seriously, I think. Live and learn?live and learn.

:yup
I often had and have thoughts like this in poker... Got my diploma in March and had to decide whether to take it (poker) REALLY seriously, as in full time job, or live a normal life. Decided to treat it like the hobby it is and it adds on top of my well paid "normal" job. Live and learn like you said.

Best of luck today
 

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
5,653
26
48
Toronto
Thanks, Riskbreaker. I hear ya.

I haven't posted these for a while--these are really just for me to if if this system is worth a damn or not.

Sides are having their best month yet, at over 60% for all games.

Here it is:

RESULTS (W-L)

???.?full?......April??..May??.June??July???August?..Sept?..October
Total..672-514..203-165.249-170..220-179?206-130
51??...49-41?.17-15??14-13??18-13?.12-8
52??...42-35?.13-13??15-10??14-12?.15-5
53??...44-38?.16-16??15-10??13-12?.18-9
54??...41-40?..14-8?...14-16??13-16?.10-11
55??...42-37?..9-12??.15-14??18-11?.15-9
56??...36-30..?17-4??.12-12??7-14?...13-14
57??...35-24?...8-6??..20-11??7-7??.14-5
58??...36-24?...8-11??11-5??..17-8?...8-6
59??...37-25?..11-11?..15-9??..11-5?..9-10
60??...32-29..?12-9??.11-12??9-8??.9-8
61??...33-20?..10-8??.16-8??..7-4??.11-6
62??...27-29?..10-8??.10-10??7-11?...13-6
63??...38-33?..13-9??.12-8??..13-16?..10-8
64??...29-21?..7-10??.11-6??..11-5?....5-7
65??...31-18?..10-4??.10-9??..11-5??11-1
66??...31-14?...9-5??..10-5??..12-4??5-5
67??...16-11.......6-2??..7-6???3-3??..6-5
68??...15-8?.....5-4??..5-1???5-3??..5-0
69??...6-6??...1-2??..3-2???2-2??..3-0
70??...12-7?.....2-2??..3-1???7-4??..4-2
71??...12-4?.....1-2??..5-0???6-2??..0-1
72??...6-4??...1-1??..4-1???1-2??..5-1
73??...7-1??...1-1??..4-0???2-0??..1-2
74??...6-5??...2-1??..3-0???1-4
75??...2-5??...0-1??..1-1???1-3??..0-1
76??...1-2??...0-0??..1-0???0-2
77??...2-0??...0-0??..0-0???2-0??..3-0
78??...2-1??...0-0??..1-0???1-1
79??...0-1???0-0??..0-0??...0-1
80??...2-1???0-0??..1-0??...1-1??..1-0
totals..182-134?..45-53?..61-41?...76-40?..41-40
(posted system totals)


Futzed around a little trying to line things up; this is about the best I could do.

The "full" column only includes April through June, so to get the full year's results you need to add the left column ("full") and the right column ("July").

206-130 for July is 61.3% winners, but I've got several spots that are dissappointing.

Notice the low 50's for July are kicking butt; 45-22 for 51's through 53's (67%). That is NOT where I need to see the best production.

A few numbers seem blessed this month (e.g. 61, 62, 65, 68) but several numbers are way off (e.g. 64, 66, 67).

I especially would like to see 70+ doing better. Only 14-7 for July (66.6%...could be worse, really).

I'm playing 2 key 63's today; they're only 10-8 for July after the Mets loss yesterday. 48-41 for 2007 is only 54% winners...maybe they're due...I can't have these stats off by this much. Wish I'd been keeping records separate for home and away, but that would have been almost twice the work. Both of the 63's I need are visitors...I give both an on-the-road penalty AND a home-field advantage (usually amounts to 2-8%, depending on who's involved) but maybe the visiting calls over 60% should be rare...save for maybe the Tigers and Padres (maybe others) who seem to perform better on the road...Tigers more in years past--they're really clicking at home this year.

51,52 and 53 can relax anytime.
I need 61-63 to be getting those results (34-20 for July is actually 62.96%, so the low 60's are looking fine this month).

Two more months to go.
Hopefully year's end results will be encouraging.
 

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
5,653
26
48
Toronto
early report for Sunday

early report for Sunday

I've 'capped the games.
Wide range of numbers for tomorrow.

Mets will have the highest probability (Maine-Traber), between 73 and 77% depending on what happens today. Line will be at least as expensive as today's game #1. Runline will be an option, especially if the Mets can produce better today than yesterday.

Yanks (Wang-Cabrera) will come in next, near 65%. Won't be an value on that one, especially after Cabrera just threw a gem last game. Wang's numbers are only so-so vs the O's, too.

Cubs and Indians will be next. I don't think I want to play against Garza right now, so the only way I might play this one (Sabathia) is under, but it would have to be at least a 9. Cubs I'm hoping will be a reasonable line (Zambrano-Belisle); up to -150 and I likely try it, but Cubs bats have calmed down of late (.602 OPS last 7 days) so some production today would be encouraging. Belisle is a total fade, right now (and maybe always).

Braves will have a very hot Hudson going against Hernandez in Arizona. Hudson's numbers are great vs the D'Backs while Livan has horrible numbers against the Braves. Could be a similar line as today's; maybe a bit better. Braves call will be at least 60% so I'll bite on a line at -120ish.

Others that might interest me include the Padres, if it's Young throwing (v.Jennings), the Brewers (Gallardo-K.Wells), the Rockies (Jimenez v. Hendrickson or Billingsley...preferably Hendrickson) if the line is reasonable (max.-125), and the Tigers if it's Moseley throwing (v.Bonderman).

Best-looking under to me looks to be at Tampa (Matsuzaka-Kazmir), while the best-looking over might be at K.C. (Loe-Nunez).

That's the early report.
Lines should be opening within the next hour or two.
 

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
5,653
26
48
Toronto
Man, I've got the itch...no 4 o'clock action.

Can't do it.

My leans were
braves
Astros
tigers

Came close, but can't do it.
Braves look best.
Tigers look worst.

Let's see how I woulda coulda shoulda done.

Det-Laa under 10 was another passing thought.

I should get Sunday's post up anytime.
Some numbers won't be finalized but I can edit later.
 
Last edited:

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
5,653
26
48
Toronto
freakin' Millwood looks like total CRAP tonight.
:com:
More than 50 pitches through the first 2, about half of them for BALLS.
:scared
Going to need some heavy production from the bats to pull this one out.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top