Do-over in Michigan and Florida?

IntenseOperator

DeweyOxburger
Forum Member
Sep 16, 2003
17,897
63
0
Chicago
By NEDRA PICKLER, Associated Press Writer

48 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - Officials in Michigan and Florida are showing renewed interest in holding repeat presidential nominating contests so that their votes will count in the epic Democratic campaign.


The governors of both states, along with top officials in Hillary Rodham Clinton's campaign, are now saying they would consider holding a sort of do-over contest by June. That's a change from their previous insistence that the primaries their states held in January should determine how the states' delegates are allocated.

Clinton won both contests, but the results were meaningless because the elections violated national party rules. Neither Clinton nor her rival Barack Obama campaigned in either state, and Obama's name wasn't even on the Michigan ballot.

The Democratic National Committee stripped both states of all their delegates for holding the primaries too early, and all Democratic candidates agreed not to campaign in either state.

Florida and Michigan moved up their dates to protest the party's decision to allow Iowa and New Hampshire to go first, followed by South Carolina and Nevada, giving them a disproportionate influence on the presidential selection process.

But no one predicted the race would still be very close this late in the year.

Ironically Michigan and Florida could have held crucial primaries if they had stayed with their traditional later dates. They may yet do so if they decide to hold news contests as Clinton and Obama compete to the wire.

Clinton has been insisting that the desires of more than 2 million people who cast Democratic ballots in the two states should be reflected at the convention, which would help her catch up with Obama's delegate lead. Obama has said he wants to see the delegates from the two critical swing states participate, too, but not if Clinton is rewarded for victories in boycotted primaries.

Now the Clinton campaign has begun expressing openness to a do-over. "Let's let all of the voters go again if they are willing to do it," said Clinton adviser Terry McAuliffe Tuesday night on MSNBC. "Whatever we have to do to get people in the system, let's do it."

The new contests could be part of a strategy for Clinton to come back in the race and attract votes from superdelegates who are not bound by any primary or caucus votes, Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell told the network. "Let's assume for the moment Hillary Clinton wins Ohio and Texas, she wins Pennsylvania, Florida and Michigan have primaries in June, she wins both of those," said Rendell, who has endorsed Clinton. "Then, can the superdelegates look at that and say, `Gosh, she's won the last five big primaries in a row. She's won almost every big primary since we began.'"

Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm, a Clinton supporter, told the Detroit Free Press that Clinton's victory in Ohio changes "the landscape a bit." She said it could open the door to a caucus, if it can be privately funded and both candidates agree.

Granholm, a Democrat, and Florida Gov. Charlie Crist, a Republican, issued a joint statement Wednesday demanding that their states' delegates be seated. "We each will call upon our respective state and national party chairs to resolve this matter and to ensure that the voters of Michigan and Florida are full participants in the formal selection of their parties' nominees," the statement said.

Crist told reporters at a news conference that he would be open to another primary, but not if Florida has to foot the bill, estimated by the Florida Democratic Party to be $25 million. He said he discussed the option with Sen. Bill Nelson, the state's senior Democrat. "He said the only way to consider the possibility of that is to have the Democratic National Committee pay for it," Crist said.

Getting funding from the national committee might be difficult when the party has a general election to wage. Last August, the DNC offered to pay for a later, alternate contest, but the Florida state party rejected the idea.

Michigan Democrats are discussing holding a "firehouse" contest in May or June that would be an alternative to a traditional primary or caucus and run by the state party, said a Democratic Party official who has been part of the discussions. "Firehouse" contests usually have fewer polling places and shorter voting hours than traditional state-run primary elections.

The party official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the discussions are private, said there was general consensus that it could not be held at taxpayers' expense and would attempt to generate participation from about 1 million state Democrats.

House and Senate Democrats from Florida and Michigan planned to meet Wednesday night on Capitol Hill to discuss ways of getting their state's delegates seated at the Democratic National Convention, Democratic aides said.

Florida Democratic Party Chairwoman Karen Thurman said the party is open to another vote, as long as it meets three criteria. Both candidates would have to fully participate, a source of funding would have to be provided and it would have to allow all the state's Democrats to participate, including those serving in the military overseas. So far, she said, no suggested alternative has met those requirements.

"It is very possible that no satisfactory alternative plan will emerge, in which case Florida Democrats will remain committed to seating the delegates allocated by the January 29th primary," Thurman said in a statement.

The Obama campaign says whether to have a repeat contest is up to the national committee, but has signaled a willingness to participate. "We're going to abide by their rules as they exist now and whatever happens in the future," Obama campaign manager David Plouffe told reporters Wednesday.

"I don't think it's for our campaign or her campaign ? we're in a heated contest here ? to have to be the facilitators here," Plouffe said. "This is between the DNC and those state parties."
 

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
do overs in mich. & fla. would be interesting...wouldn't it ?

If it happens, McCain is IN because it will ensure a total and complete meltdown within the democratic party. Nice work Howard Dean.

And probably, even if it doesn't happen, McCain is in. The democrats have an uncanny ability to implode and this has all the markings of the same.

After yesterday, this is shaping up as a major clusterf*ck for the dems, do-overs in Michigan and Florida or not.

Get ready, 'super delegates.' Should be a 'normal' convention.
 

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
Sen. Bill Nelson paints Florida ?train wreck? scenario

Sen. Bill Nelson paints Florida ?train wreck? scenario

the dems really blew it with these 2 important states..

By Manu Raju

Posted: 03/06/08 12:43 PM [ET]

Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) warned the Democratic National Committee (DNC) Thursday that it is facing the ?biggest train wreck you?ve ever seen? if a standoff is not resolved over his state?s pledged delegates to the party?s presidential nominating convention.

Nelson sent a letter to DNC Chairman Howard Dean Thursday asking the committee to either accept the Jan. 29 results of the primary election or pay for a redo of the elections, which could cost in the range of $20 million. He sent the letter after Dean did not return his telephone call Wednesday.

?If they go to the Democratic Convention and stiff-arm the Florida delegations, how in the world do you think Floridians are going to support the Democratic nominee on Nov. 4?? Nelson told reporters Thursday. ?It?s in everybody?s interest to find a solution to this problem.?

However, earlier in the day, Dean said the party would not pay for any do-over.

?We can?t afford to do that,? Dean stated on CBS?s ?Early Show.? ?That?s not our problem. We need our money to win the presidential race.?

The DNC stripped Florida and Michigan of their delegates after both states moved up their primary dates. How to resolve the impasse is even more critical now that Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.) and Barack Obama (Ill.) are locked in a neck-and-neck battle for the presidential nomination, and neither has a clear path toward winning enough delegates to clinch the nomination. Clinton won both states, but both candidates agreed not to campaign there and Obama was not on the ballot in Michigan.

Lawmakers from both states met with DNC officials late Wednesday, but no progress was made on resolving the dispute. It?s unclear whether further meetings will occur.

Nelson warned that if the DNC does not pay for a new primary and if the delegations are not seated, Democrats could very easily lose Florida, which has long played a key role in deciding the winner of the general election.

?If they are not going to accept Florida?s election, then we can do a redo, full-blown election again, but someone is going to have to pay for it other than the taxpayers of Florida,? Nelson said.

Florida?s Republican governor, Charlie Crist, and GOP legislature have refused to pay for a redo of the primaries, but Crist is open to holding another election paid for by the DNC, which has struggled in fundraising.

Nelson said not resolving the impasse would disenfranchise 1.75 million Florida Democrats who voted in the Jan. 29 primaries, as well as independents.
 
Last edited:

smurphy

cartographer
Channel Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,909
133
63
16
L.A.
I agree with Dean. Those states violated the rules and they are out. It shouldn't be a consideration. They made their decision and knew it would cost them this time around. NO DO-OVERS.
 

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
I agree with Dean. Those states violated the rules and they are out. It shouldn't be a consideration. They made their decision and knew it would cost them this time around. NO DO-OVERS.

i wonder how that sits with the voter's in those states....we should send kosar to do a man in the street type interview throughout fla with the voter's to see what their reaction is...we have to find somebody in michigan to do the same...
 

smurphy

cartographer
Channel Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,909
133
63
16
L.A.
In Florida, I'm sure they are already used to their votes not counting. Don't know about Michigan.

Whoever heads the party in each of these states are to blame. They are the ones who made the decision to not have their voters voices heard. Focking pathetic. They made their bed, so lay in it. This do-over crap is childish.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top