Obama Vs McCain - KOD

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
Michelle Obama
.............................................................................................

Laura Bush has class and style . Even if George W
is the lowest rated President in history,

Laura Bush rates as one of the most likeable first ladys ever .

If polygamy was allowed in Georgia I swear I would marry that Laura Bush .

Take a look at what happen to a former boyfriend who she caught dating one of her friends. :scared :scared

e.

Examples:

[Collected on the Internet, 2004]

I heard at a party last Saturday that Laura Bush, at age 17, ran a stop sign and crashed into another car, killing a 17-year-old classmate.


[Collected on the Internet, 2003]

I heard a rumor this past weekend concerning our First Lady, Laura Bush, to the effect that she committed manslaughter at one time by backing over her boyfriend with her car.

Origins: Driving is one of the most dangerous activities we engage in, and most of us do it every day, little realizing the peril of it. Every year in the U.S. there are approximately 6.5 million traffic accidents, resulting in about 42,000 fatalities.

This is the story of one of those accidents. It resulted in the death of someone you've never heard of, at the hands of someone you have.

In May 2000, a two-page police report pertaining to a fatal accident that had taken place near Midland, Texas, in 1963 was made public. It Laura Bush contained the information that 17-year-old Laura Welch had run a stop sign, causing the death of the sole occupant of the vehicle hers had struck. According to that report, the future First Lady had been driving her Chevrolet sedan on a clear night shortly after 8 p.m. on 6 November 1963 when she entered an intersection without heeding the stop sign and there collided with the Corvair sedan driven by 17-year-old Michael Douglas. Also in the car with Laura Welch was a passenger, 17-year-old Judy Dykes.

How fast Miss Welch might have been driving is open to question. That part of the police report is illegible, although two biographies of the First Lady refer to her as having been going 50 mph at the time of the collision. The speed limit on that portion of road was 55 mph. According to the police report neither driver had been drinking, but no tests were performed. No charges were filed as a result of the accident.

News accounts from 1963 reported the young man as having been thrown from his car and dying of a broken neck; he was pronounced dead on arrival at Midland Memorial Hospital. According to various biographies of Mrs. Bush, the boy's father had been travelling in a car immediately behind his son's and witnessed the whole thing.

The two teen girls were taken to the same hospital and treated for minor injuries that amounted to bumps and bruises.

Michael Douglas, the young man who was killed, had been a member of Laura Welch's crowd at high school and her friend. He had been a star athlete, excelling in track and football, and was looked up to by his peers not just for his athlete prowess, but for his personality and intelligence too. By all reports, he was likeable, outgoing, and funny. He was nominated as the school's most popular boy while a junior, an honor that almost always went to a senior.

There has always been speculation about the nature of his relationship with Laura Welch. One rumor asserts the two had never dated, but that Laura had been romantically interested in him. Another claims he had been Laura's boyfriend when he died, and another that he had once
been her boyfriend but the couple had subsequently broken up. (The latter theory is advanced in the 2002 biography of the Bushes, George and Laura: Portrait of an American Marriage, which states Laura Welch and Michael Douglas had dated throughout early and mid-1963, but by the fall of that year Michael was going out with Regan Gammon, one of Miss Welch's closest friends.)

The accident is difficult to understand it that it took place on a clear night on dry pavement at a crossroads described as "the middle of nowhere," where the view was unobstructed and the stop sign that faced Laura Welch was clearly visible. (The intersection was a two-way, not a four-way, stop.) Yet looking to only weather and road conditions to explain what happened is to miss the obvious: there were two teen girls in the car, girls who were on their way to a party and thus who likely would have been bubbling over with chatter about who would be there. Laura Welch, the driver, had turned 17 only two days earlier. She and her passenger were still of an age when they could all too easily shut out everything going on around them, even the approach of another car and the recognition of a stop sign.

There are those who want to believe the future First Lady deliberately and with malice aforethought murdered her (ex-)boyfriend over some now forgotten teen tiff and who point to what they view as the suspicious circumstances of the accident and the subsequent lack of prosecution as proofs of their supposition. Yet to entertain such a hypothesis is to believe the young woman would have attempted to kill another by doing away with herself. (As the driver of what was intended to be a murder weapon, she would have had no reason to believe she would survive a collision severe enough to be fatal to her prey ? that events turned out that way doesn't mean that outcome could have been reasonably foreseen.) Although the theory of "I'll kill you even though I have to kill myself to do it" might still play in a person sufficiently vengeance-minded (e.g., a suicide bomber), it is far better discounted in cases where an innocent life would also be taken (e.g., a passenger in the car). Those intent upon acts of revenge are generally impelled by a misguided sense of justice, and there is precious little justice (misguided or otherwise) in causing the death of innocent parties.

Then there are the circumstances of the crash. It was 8 pm on a November night in Texas on roads far removed from any town, so it was dark. With no stop sign facing him, the doomed young man would have had no reason to slow his vehicle even if he had seen another car approaching the intersection. He therefore would have been travelling at least 50 mph. Laura Welch ran the stop sign facing her, so there is reason to assume she too was going approximately 50 mph, the speed she would have been doing if she'd had the right of way.

Consider two cars travelling in the dark at right angles to each other, each going approximately 50 mph. The span of time available in which to form murderous intent would have amounted to mere seconds, given the speed at which the event was unfolding and how close the two vehicles had to be to one another before the ill-intentioned would recognize the vehicle of her target. It doesn't add up.

One e-mailed version of the rumor tries to supply an answer to that inconsistency, saying, "She knew it was her boyfriend's car driving south, because of the unique headlight configuration of his 1962 Corvair Sedan." The vehicles were traveling at right angles to one another, so an unusual headlight array on one wouldn't have been visible to the other. (According to the experts, the headlight array on the 1962 Corvair was typical of the cars of the day; two headlights on each side, as this photo shows.)

So 17-year-old Laura Welch did cause the death of a friend by running a stop sign, but to see more in the story than that is to surrender oneself up to baseless imaginings. Yes, it is always easier to attribute malice to bad outcomes, but that does not mean malice is an integral component of tragedy, especially those involving people Fate later chooses to exalt.

According to George and Laura: Portrait of an American Marriage, Laura Welch did not find out that the driver of the other vehicle had died at the scene until later when she and her girlfriend were being treated at the hospital. And she did not learn his identity until later still, when her parents arrived and broke the news to her. It shattered her.

She was barely 17 and she had taken the life of a friend. She has since carried the weight of this, and it changed her, at least according to those who knew her before and after. Only rarely has she spoken of this with the press (although she has often been asked), but even on those occasions her answers have been oblique, almost as if she cannot bear to think of it, let alone speak of it.

Barbara "there are many sides to a tragedy, never just one" Mikkelson

Last updated: 27 September 2004
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,496
260
83
Victory Lane
Sponge

if you posted that to discredit Laura Bush in any way , you are going to suffer servere lashing posts from here to eternity.

So it was a terrible accident.

That record should be closed if she was just 17.

There is tragedy in every person's life.

I would like to pull up some of your friggin
misfit records.
 

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
Sponge

if you posted that to discredit Laura Bush in any way , you are going to suffer servere lashing posts from here to eternity.

So it was a terrible accident.

That record should be closed if she was just 17.

There is tragedy in every person's life.

I would like to pull up some of your friggin
misfit records.

She even get a ticket? I know i would get some jail time. My records? Im as clean as a whistle my brother clean as a whistle.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,496
260
83
Victory Lane
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Sen. John McCain on Thursday accused Sen. Barack Obama of breaking a promise when the Democrat decided to forgo public financing in this fall's campaign.

Sen. Barack Obama repeatedly broke campaign fundraising records during the Democratic primary season.

Obama told supporters in an e-mail message Thursday that he would not accept about $85 million in public funds when he becomes the Democratic presidential nominee.

In the e-mail, Obama said the public campaign financing system allowed "special interests [to] drown out the voices of the American people" and asked his supporters to "declare our independence from a broken system."

McCain said that Obama's move to drop out of the system "should be disturbing to all Americans" and that he may decide to opt out, too.

"Sen. Obama's reversal on public financing is one of a number of reversals ... that he has taken," McCain said while touring flood-damaged parts of Iowa.

"This election is about a lot of things, but it's also about trust. It's also about whether you can take people's word. ... He said he would stick to his agreement. He didn't." Watch McCain's attack on Obama ?

He said his campaign will reconsider whether to opt out as well.

"We''l have to reevaluate in light of his decision," he said. But he said he leans toward taking public money.

But Rep. Rahm Emanuel, an Obama supporter, argued that the Democrat had "more than realized the objective of public financing" by setting up a system to accept small donations over the Internet.
.........................................................

Lets see McCain gets 84 million and is limited while Obama gets 255 million to run the campaign.

:142smilie :142smilie

what would Hilllary do ?

what would George W do ?

This is funny to me. McCain getting desperate again playing his own lobby politics.

Limited money for McCain :142smilie :142smilie
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,496
260
83
Victory Lane
Barack finally has his bounce. For weeks many political experts and pollsters have been wondering why the race between Democrat Barack Obama and Republican John McCain had stayed so tight, even after the Illinois senator wrested the nomination from Hillary Clinton. With numbers consistently showing rock-bottom approval ratings for President Bush and a large majority of Americans unhappy with the country's direction, the opposing-party candidate should, in the normal course, have attracted more disaffected voters. Now it looks as if Obama is doing just that. A new NEWSWEEK Poll shows that he has a substantial double-digit lead, 51 percent to 36 percent, over McCain among registered voters nationwide.

..........................................................

Kick his ass Seabass !

Obama in the drivers seat making all the right decisons . McCain desperately trying to make him look bad, but just can't seem to hit more than weak one liners.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,496
260
83
Victory Lane
041105_Ch4BushMccain_hd.hmedium.jpg


McCain - Georgie I am losing ground fast.

George W. - Dont worry John we are planning something big for Iran. It should make these stupid people scared enough to elect you then.

McCain - Yeh but what if it dont work ?

George W - I got Rove and Cheney working on it.

McCain - But Georgie you promised me .

 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,496
260
83
Victory Lane
June 22, 2008
GOP fears Barr could spoil McCain's bid
Posted: 11:00 AM ET

Former Republican Rep. Bob Barr
ATLANTA (AP) ?
A fiery former GOP congressman who gained national prominence for doggedly pursuing impeachment of President Clinton has some Republicans worried he'll play spoiler in a tight presidential contest.

Bob Barr's Libertarian Party bid for the White House is the longest of long shots, but political experts say he may be able to exploit the unease some die-hard conservatives still feel about Sen. John McCain, the Republican nominee-in-waiting. Combined with the surge in turnout among Democrats during the primaries and a difficult political climate for Republicans, they see what could be a recipe for trouble for the GOP.

"Bob could be the Ralph Nader of 2008," said Dan Schnur, a GOP consultant in California who worked on McCain's 2000 campaign but is not involved in this year's contest. Consumer advocate Nader is
the third-party candidate many Democrats blame for helping George W. Bush narrowly win in 2000.

Rep. John Linder, a Republican who defeated Barr in 2002 after Georgia's Democratic-controlled Legislature redrew congressional boundaries to put the two lawmakers in the same district, said he
didn't think Barr would top 4 percent of the vote.

"But in some states that may be enough," Linder said.

Democrats seem gleeful at the prospect. Tad Devine, a Washington-based Democratic strategist, said Republicans "are crazy if they aren't worried about Barr."

"Undoubtedly any votes he gets come out of McCain's votes," Devine said. "He hurts them."

Barr, a former federal prosecutor, was swept into Congress with more than 70 other House GOP freshmen in 1994. An articulate, sometimes outspoken orator, he gained attention as the first
lawmaker to call for Clinton's resignation over the Monica Lewinsky scandal and was one of the House prosecutors who pressed the impeachment case in the Senate.

Barr also was known during his four terms in the House for his opposition to softening drug laws, including the medical use of marijuana, and his support for gun rights. He tried unsuccessfully to bar military bases from according witchcraft adherents the same accommodations as other religious worshippers.

Even after Clinton left office, Barr continued to pursue him. He asked congressional investigators to study the extent of White House damage done by departing Clinton staffers and tried to build
a "Counter Clinton Library" in Little Rock, Arkansas. He filed a $30 million lawsuit against Clinton, adviser James Carville and Hustler magazine publisher Larry Flynt for causing him "emotional
distress" in retaliation for the impeachment proceedings.

Some Republicans aren't worried about Barr's candidacy. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said voting for Barr is the same as voting for Democrat Barack Obama, and said he's confident most GOP
voters will understand that.

"No reasonable conservative is going to vote for anyone except McCain," Gingrich said.

Even so, Barr campaign manager Russell Verney said he expects Republicans to mount challenges to keep Barr off the ballot in a number of states, much like Democrats did to Nader in 2004.

Verney was campaign manager for H. Ross Perot, who rocked the political establishment with his 1992 independent presidential bid that drew 19 percent of the vote.

The Libertarian Party hasn't cracked 1 percent of the national popular vote in a presidential race. But it bills itself as the third-largest political party and is already on the ballot in 30 states, with petition drives this summer aiming at 20 others.

The toughest obstacles are likely to be in West Virginia, Oklahoma, Illinois and Washington, D.C., where ballot access rules are prohibitive, said Libertarian Party political director Sean Haugh.

Democrats also have had success knocking third-party candidates of the ballot in Pennsylvania, considered a swing state.

But Barr may have the most impact in his home state of Georgia, where he is still well-known.

In recent years, Barr has earned a reputation as an iconoclast.

A National Rifle Association board member, Barr has joined with the liberal American Civil Liberties Union against the Bush administration-backed Patriot Act and reversed himself on medical marijuana use, now lobbying in favor of it.

He said it is the unchecked growth of government that led him to abandon the GOP two years ago.

In the coming weeks, Barr plans to open a campaign headquarters in Atlanta.

"I think John McCain is going to have to battle for Georgia, a state that was a gimme for George Bush," said Matt Towery, a former Republican state lawmaker in Georgia who runs a political
media company.

Georgia and its 15 electoral votes have been expected to go Republican on election night, and McCain spokesman Jeffrey Sadosky said he remained confident they still would.

Still, the enthusiasm Obama has generated among Georgia's large black population continues to worry McCain strategists. Far from writing off Georgia, Obama has a campaign team registering voters and is airing a TV ad in the state.

Barr scoffs at talk that he will play spoiler, saying he is in the race to win it and it won't be his fault if McCain loses.

"If Senator McCain is not successful, it will be because his message and his vision did not resonate with a plurality of the voters," Barr said in an interview with The Associated Press.

Barr also hopes to tap into the zealous grass-roots network of Rep. Ron Paul, who recently dropped his bid for the GOP presidential nomination and pledged to support "Libertarian-leaning Republicans." Paul, a Texas Republican who ran for president on the Libertarian Party ticket in 1988, drew
hefty campaign contributions online, but did not win any primaries.

Paul supporters said they're giving Barr a look. Some are skeptical.

"We're waiting to see if he's deliberately moving toward Ron Paul's principles to be politically popular," said Marlane O'Neill, a Paul supporter in Atlanta.
..........................................................

they are worried about Barr.

McCains worst enemy is George W and himself.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,496
260
83
Victory Lane
McCain Adviser Regrets Terrorism Remark
By Michael Cooper

FRESNO, Calif. ?
A senior adviser to Senator John McCain apologized Monday for saying in a magazine interview that another terrorist attack in the United States would ?be a big advantage? for Mr. McCain in the upcoming election.
The adviser, Charlie Black, was quoted in an interview with Fortune magazine describing the assassination of Benazir Bhutto in December was an ?unfortunate event? but adding that: ?But his knowledge and ability to talk about it re-emphasized that this is the guy who?s ready to be commander in chief. And it helped us.? The magazine then added: ?As would, Black concedes with startling candor after we raise the issue, another terrorist attack on U.S. soil. ?Certainly it would be a big advantage to him,? says Black.??
Mr. McCain condemned the statement at a news conference here. Mr. Black said in a statement: ?I deeply regret the comments, they were inappropriate, I recognize that John McCain has devoted his entire adult life to protecting his country and placing its security before every other consideration.??
Asked about the statement to Fortune at his news conference here, Mr. McCain said: ?I cannot imagine why he would say it. It?s not true. I?ve worked tirelessly since 9/11 to prevent another attack on the United States of America. My record is very clear. The Armed Services Committee, and pieces of legislation, sponsoring with Joe Lieberman the 9/11 Commission so we could find out the causes and how to fix the challenges that we face, to fix the security of our nation. I cannot imagine it. So I would If he said that, and I do not know the context, I strenuously disagree.??
Updated | 5:50 p.m.: Bill Burton, a spokesman for the Obama campaign, weighed in with a statement: ?Barack Obama welcomes a debate about terrorism with John McCain, who has fully supported the Bush policies that have taken our eye off of Al Qaeda, failed to bring Osama bin Laden to justice, and made us less safe. The fact that John McCain?s top adviser says that a terrorist attack on American soil would be a ?big advantage? for their political campaign is a complete disgrace, and is exactly the kind of politics that needs to change. Barack Obama will turn the page on these failed policies and this cynical and divisive brand of politics so that we can unite this nation around a common purpose to finish the fight against Al Qaeda.?
......................................................

McCain and the boys a bunch of war mongers.

They are pathetic
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,496
260
83
Victory Lane
Centrist ? Just what it sounds like. Someone who doesn?t have any particularly strong ideological leanings in any direction.

Conservative ? Specifically a "fusionist" conservative of the National Review - Heritage Foundation mold. Someone who believes in traditional morality and capitalism, and the need for a limited government to allow both to flourish.

Left-libertarian ? The quiz uses a mild definition of a left-libertarian, an anti-statist who is somewhat fearful of corporate and religious influence on public life.

Liberal ? Supports economic regulation to promote social justice and takes a progressive stance toward moral or cultural issues.

Libertarian ? A libertarian opposes most or all government activites. Does not favor much or any government support for either moral or economic systems.

Neoconservative ? A "neocon" is more inclined than other conservatives toward vigorous government in the service of the goals of traditional morality and pro-business policies. Tends to favor a very strong foreign policy of America as well.

Paleoconservative ? "Paleocons" want less US involvement in foeign affairs than other conservatives and oppose mass immigration. They are also more favorably disposed toward the South and the idea of secession, or at least decentralization, than neoconservatives.

Paleo-libertarian ? Similar to other libertarians except for oppostion to mass immigration, and shares the paleocon appreciation of the South.

Radical ? Critical of bouregois morality and strongly opposed to capitalism and willing to use state power to achieve desired ends.

Third-way ? More supportive of foreign intervention than liberals and less supportive of economic regulation, coupled with more-or-less progressive social views. "Third-way" is to liberal what neoconservative is to conservative.
................................................................
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,471
139
63
Bowling Green Ky
Scott--Here's Obamas 1st ad "The country I love"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ylVTBiGh00c

How many distortions/lies can you find in this short ad.

cut taxes? or how about --

Now some fresh pickings from the Political Grapevine:

Resume Builder

Barack Obama's first general election ad says about 46 seconds in that the Illinois senator passed laws that "extended health care for wounded troops who'd been neglected."

The ad "Country I Love", which was released Friday, provides a citation at the bottom of the screen which reads "Public Law 110 - 181."

The problem is Senator Obama never voted for that legislation. Public Law 110 - 181 is part of the defense authorization bill which passed the Senate in January by a vote of 91 to three with six senators not voting. Barack Obama was among those six absent senators.

:shrug:
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,496
260
83
Victory Lane
Scott--, provides a citation at the bottom of the screen which reads "Public Law 110 - 181."

The problem is Senator Obama never voted for that legislation. Public Law 110 - 181 is part of the defense authorization bill which passed the Senate in January by a vote of 91 to three with six senators not voting. Barack Obama was among those six absent senators.

:shrug:
............................................................

Maybe Obama was there in spirit.

I hate to say this DTB but I am doubting your sources. I dont have time to check on this and see if he in fact missed the vote, or that 110-181
Public Law is even referring to that bill.

I hope you did your homework on this, I would hate to have to prove a kosar spongism here after Sponge was busted out on his sources.
 
Last edited:

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,471
139
63
Bowling Green Ky
Hmmm You got lots of opps to go back over 13,000 plus posts to catch any gliches you can--

I'm 100% transparent

--listening to the all hat no cattle crowd will get you will get you in those Wednesday night meetings ;)
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,496
260
83
Victory Lane
Hmmm You got lots of opps to go back over 13,000 plus posts to catch any gliches you can--

I'm 100% transparent

--listening to the all hat no cattle crowd will get you will get you in those Wednesday night meetings ;)

...............................................................
OK he did miss this vote. But how many votes do Senators miss every month/ year.

Obama did have a hand in crafting some sections of this law. The fact that he missed the final vote doesn't mean he didn't have a hand in it. Since the bill passed 91-3 in the Senate, I'm guessing that he knew it was going to pass, and so didn't feel the need to reschedule whatever it was he was doing at the time. If you know how politics
works then you know how they go about getting and tallying the potential votes for various pieces of legislation. I think if a bill you helped craft, even partly, is looking like it's on the fence, you are sure to be there for the final vote. When you know that some 90 Senators are voting yes for it, the pressure may be considerably less. So if you have something scheduled out of town you can safely miss the final floor vote.

So touche DTB and the donkey you rode in on.

You got to learn to be a little more open minded about politics and not try to make everything into something huge, thats really a mole hill.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,471
139
63
Bowling Green Ky
I got n problem with him missing vote in his busy schedule at time--my prob is him blowing smoke up the groupies ass--especially when their legs are tingling already--

grifter, con artist, con man, confidence man - a swindler who exploits the confidence of his victim
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
dtb...i thought we were done for come november...but i just got an e-mail saying that rove is negotiating to have a 24/7 three stooges marathon on for election day....

that just may suppress the obama turnout enough for us to squeek by...:mj09:
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,471
139
63
Bowling Green Ky
More Audacity of Hype :)

When Barack Obama declined John McCain's invitation to appear at a series of joint town hall meetings he not only went back on an earlier indication that he would, but he also contradicted what he wrote in his book.

In page 101 of "The Audacity of Hope," Obama writes that "one of my favorite tasks of being a senator is hosting town hall meetings. I held 39 of them my first year in the Senate."

Obama says in page 102 they are like "a dip in a cool stream. I feel cleansed afterward, glad for the work I have chosen."
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,496
260
83
Victory Lane
More Audacity of Hype :)

When Barack Obama declined John McCain's invitation to appear at a series of joint town hall meetings he not only went back on an earlier indication that he would, but he also contradicted what he wrote in his book.

In page 101 of "The Audacity of Hope," Obama writes that "one of my favorite tasks of being a senator is hosting town hall meetings. I held 39 of them my first year in the Senate."

Obama says in page 102 they are like "a dip in a cool stream. I feel cleansed afterward, glad for the work I have chosen."
...............................................................

I just figured it out DTB.

Its not that you dislike Obama , its that you cant stand that he is a intelligent person with a good chance to win this election.

Obama graduated at top of his class.

McCain graduated at the bottom:shrug:

Obama has leverage. He will not have to do anything that plays into the hand of John McCain.

Town Hall meetings are McCains strength :142smilie

I doubt it.

Obama will only set up debates that will show him in the best possible scenario. Thats intelligence.

I worry about you sometimes DTB.
 
Last edited:

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,496
260
83
Victory Lane
Whats a conservative ?

A conservative believes that our inalienable rights do not include housing, healthcare or Hummers.

A conservative believes that our inalienable rights DO include the pursuit of happiness. That means it is guaranteed to no one.

A conservative believes that those who pursue happiness and find it have a right to not be penalized for that success.

A conservative believes that there are no protections against the hardship and heartache of failure. We believe that the right to fail is just as important as the chance to succeed and that those who do fail learn essential lessons that will help them the next time around.

A conservative believes in personal responsibility and accepts the consequences for his or her words and actions.

A conservative believes that real compassion can't be found in any government program.

A conservative believes that each of us has a duty to take care of our neighbors. It was private individuals, companies and congregations that sent water, blankets and supplies to New Orleans far before the government ever set foot there.

A conservative believes that family is the cornerstone of our society and that people have a right to manage their family any way they see fit, so long as it's not criminal. We are far more attuned to our family's needs than some faceless, soulless government program.

A conservative believes that people have a right to worship the God of their understanding. We also believe that people do not have the right to jam their version of God (or no God) down anybody else's throat.

A conservative believes that people go to the movies to be entertained and to church to be preached to, not the other way around.

A conservative believes that debt creates unhealthy relationships. Everyone, from the government on down, should live within their means and strive for financial independence.

A conservative believes that a child's education is the responsibility of the parents, not the government.

A conservative believes that every human being has a right to life, from conception to death.

A conservative believes in the smallest government you can get without anarchy. We know our history: The larger a government gets, the harder it will fall.

..............................................
 

Tenzing

Registered
Forum Member
Jun 14, 2002
274
0
0
55
Austin, Texas
10 Things you might not know about Hussein

10 Things you might not know about Hussein

10 things you might not know about Obama



1. He is a dirty low down leftist, a trait his adulthood schoolmates in America found disgusting. In our culture, Adults were expected to work, provide for themselves, not commit felonies, and stop trolling forums with useless dribble.

2. Raised by Muslims in the worlds' largest Muslim nation he learned to be a Muslim and was praised for his knowledge of Muslim theology. He has since tried to fool people into thinking he's a Christian, even tho his name is Barack Hussein Obama, and he chose a "church" that teaches non-Biblical ideas, and that espouses hatred and bigotry.

3. At the suggestion of his hoodlum friends he turned to cocaine, and various other substances of abuse, as mentioned in his auto-biography.

4. He was a at a high school, Punahou Academy, in Hawaii. We don't know if he was black, since that's important, right? And anyways, his mother is Caucasian.

5. He is descended from slave owners on his mother's side meaning he is WHITE, and should be ashamed of himself for owning slaves, that bastard; his father was a low level political scumbag who preyed on women from Kenya. His father died in a driving-while-intoxicated accident. Not the senior Obamas' first alcohol related accident either, as he lost his BOTH his legs in a crash when he was severely drunk many years before his death.

6. He won a Grammy in 2006 for Best Spoken Word for the CD version of his autobiography, "Dreams From My Father."

7. He taught constitutional law part time at the University of Chicago for several years before being elected to the U.S. Senate
in 2004. He was in the senate for 140 days, and then immediately had more experience than anyone else on earth to be president (lol, good one.)

8. If he weren't a politician, he'd still be a low-life scum ball who lies, cheats, dirty deals, and associates with convicted felons.

9. Favorite movies: "The Godfather" (Parts I and II) and "Lawrence of Arabia."

10. His family included 3 mothers, all of whom were married to his father at the same time.
The elder Obama was a serial bigamist who would have married more women had time permitted.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top