CHAMP WEEKEND
- Thread starter THUNDER
- Start date
- Mar 19, 2006
- 38,219
- 377
- 83
- 74
am very interested to see if you play that total and Indy in the 7 point teaser..
solid work...
gl
solid work...
gl
WAS HOPING THE LINE WOULD GO MY WAY ITS NOT
MINNY +4.5 -120 7%
MINNY ML +190 2%
NOT A HOMER PLAY I HAVE PLENTY OF REASONS TO TAKE THE 4 POINTS AND IT LOOKS LIKE THE SHARPS DO -
MINNY +4.5 -120 7%
MINNY ML +190 2%
NOT A HOMER PLAY I HAVE PLENTY OF REASONS TO TAKE THE 4 POINTS AND IT LOOKS LIKE THE SHARPS DO -
Ill take it no problem since I am not touching the game, not side anyway!! Could be a stressful watch though lol
Probably have to put a little something on it.
Like the teaser!!!
Probably have to put a little something on it.
Like the teaser!!!
I WILL EXPLAIN IN DETAIL WHY I LIKE THEM TO COVER
TEASER IS A GREAT IDEA IF YOU WANT ACTION ON THE GAME BUT CANT BET AGAINST YOUR HOME TEAM -WIN WIN SITUATION
- Mar 19, 2006
- 38,219
- 377
- 83
- 74
thanks for the reply on teaser..
MINNY ML +190:shrug: 2%
typo....:shrug:
think you meant +160
I could be wrong
MINNY ML +190:shrug: 2%
typo....:shrug:
think you meant +160
I could be wrong
I have the exact same teaser Thunder. Except I got the minny total at 43. Nice to see you are thinking the same way.
GL with the rest of your playa :toast:
I alluded to some reasons i liked the Vikings play last week -everybody is talking about Allen and Edwards off the edge but the key to the game upfront is the two tackles the Williams boys. I have watched the game 3 times now and and against a excellent large blocking line just bulldozed over them play after play- they took up 4 to 5(including a back) blockers up quite often.Thus the ends and blitzers(how few times they did) wer cut loose. Know will this happen again- i believe it will - you have 2 pro-bowl dominate tackles that at times this year decided to not put there best foot forward - well i say they do -the Williams boys were challenged and told they were the key to getting to the Superbowl. They are best friends and believe by what I have read that they want to dominate -there are no better 2 tackles combos- period. Brees has only been sacked 20 times BUT THEY HAVE PLAYED AGAINST THE 24TH EASIEAST SCHEDUELE AGAINST THE SACK. now do i think he gets sacked 6 times no way but i do think the vikings are able to pressure thru the tackles leaving the ends to do there thing thus leaving a extra blocker in on passing downs. The vikings left 6 to 7 in coverage last week due to the play of the d line -this is the first big key in my eye having extra men in read coverage either rush or pass not having to take chances with to many blitzes and not keeping the middle of the field open. I believe it happens. Secondly does mn shut down the run and does no shut down the vikings run. everybody is talking about how the vikings are not running the way they should WELL THEY PLAYED THE #3 overall rush d scheduele this year and still were 12TH in the league in Rushing Meanwhile teams that ranked in the bottom third in the league in rush d they played ALA SAINTS (20TH) the vikings ranked 3rd in rushing - The saints have shown there rush d is really bad and believe me these numbers would be much worse if teams didnt have to abandon the run against them. they have taken alot of big leads. Alot of teams do not even try to run against the vikings -least amount rush attemps against 357 -teams just cant run against them- Will the saints stop AP and taylor this week -why would they -every good rushing team ranked in the top 15 there numbers are alarming- 162 YPG WITH A 6.2 YPC AGAINST:scared when in this senario there 29th in the leage against the run- Well the last arguement is the Vikings are a average road team on the surface very accurate statement- but not playing on the funny stuf- and indoors they are 11-0 and 8-3 Ats - there numbers are almost identical in those games the drop-off comes in outdoor games -SOME PEOPLE MAY SAY IT SHOULDNT MATTER WELL IT ALWAYS DOES.Some teams that play on grass dont play well in domes and vice versa -some domed teams or warm weather teams do not play well in the cold some teams do not travel cross country well- this does matter. LAstly the only 2 team NO played this year that had even close to a well rounded team were the cowboys and patriots but the patriots are not a running team they got beat soundly by the cowboys the Cowboys gave the blue print to beat these guys run the ball and put be able to pressure without blitzing leaving plenty in coverage-None of this happens if the Saints take a big lead i just do not see that - Vikings o wise are an elite team d wise they are way more proficient than the Saints- Lastly no kicker sucks if they are held to fgoals on drives can he meet the task. One more thing lined opened at 4.5 at has gone thru 4 a key number with 53% to 47% action on vikes the big boys like the 4.-- VIKINGS BY 7
Last edited:
Great information Thunder!!
More reason for me to just sit back and watch it play out.
And you even left the caps off for that
GL in ALL your plays buddy!!
More reason for me to just sit back and watch it play out.
And you even left the caps off for that
GL in ALL your plays buddy!!
Great information Thunder!!
More reason for me to just sit back and watch it play out.
And you even left the caps off for that
GL in ALL your plays buddy!!
I thought i would be nice today
For Years we thought the better D team. And the one the that had best rush stats. Covered. They maybe giving N Or to much home field advantage.
On a neutral site wouldn't this be a pickem. Im no homer I don't like Vikes being a GB backer. Vikes just make sence. GL
On a neutral site wouldn't this be a pickem. Im no homer I don't like Vikes being a GB backer. Vikes just make sence. GL
great writeup thunder....hope you're right :spotting:
WELL THEY PLAYED THE #3 overall rush d scheduele this year and still were 12TH in the league in Rushing
where do you get these numbers (the ones indicating i.e. strength of "rush d' for example)? do you track or get this at nfl.com? thx
WELL THEY PLAYED THE #3 overall rush d scheduele this year and still were 12TH in the league in Rushing
where do you get these numbers (the ones indicating i.e. strength of "rush d' for example)? do you track or get this at nfl.com? thx
Last edited:
I KEEP STATS THAT MATTER TO ME ALOT OF WORK
NO TEAM WITH AS POUROUS A D RANKED 24TH(NORLEANS) HAVE EVER MADE THE BIG ONE -INDY IN 2006 WAS RANKED 21ST BUT WOULD OF RANKED 15 TH THIS YEAR ALOT OF REALLY BAD TEAMS D WISE THIS YEAR -BEFORE 2006 THE HIGHEST TO MAKE THE BIG ONE WAS 16TH RATED -
