1/23 Thurs. College Hoop Call

Riff-Raff

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 9, 2016
2,800
20
0
South Lake Tahoe (CA. Side)
Portland/Loy Marymount Over 125....10 u 💪

Belmont/Murray St Over 147......10 u 💪

Hofstra -7.......10 u 💪

High Point +6......10 u 💪

Montana/Idaho St Over 130.....10 u 💪 💪 💪

Montana -6.....10 u 💪

UAB/So Miss Over 125......10 u 💪 💪

*USC/Oregon Over 139 grades strong but I'm off the PAC 12 so FYI

Good Luck
 

RUSerious

Registered
Forum Member
Feb 11, 2018
94
9
8
RR; this is probably the last time I will recap a smoking night, as I know KARMA can work in mysterious ways.

Although cashing is all that counts, there is a difference between covering a line and burying a line. So, again, your insight on NCAAM is much appreciated. This is very much a rerun from last night.

5-2 Straight Up and 8-2 +Units.

* (W) Portland/Loyola Marymount (x1) Over 125. Game ended at 142, or +17.

* (W) Belmont/Murray St (x1) Over 147. Game ended at 160, or +13.

* (W) High Point +6 (x1). Game ended at High Point +3 (OT), but HP was up double digits late in the 2nd Half.

* (W) Montana/Idaho St (x3) Over 130. Game ended at 151, or +21.

* (W) UAB/So Miss (x2) Over 125. Game ended at 161, or +36.

* (L) Hofstra -7. Game ended 73 - 71 Delaware.

* (L) Montana -6. Game ended 77 - 74 Montana. Sloppy turnovers in the last 3 minutes blew the cover.

RU
 

RUSerious

Registered
Forum Member
Feb 11, 2018
94
9
8
RR;

I plugged my nose and went with OVER 138 on the Pac 12 Special, Oregon vs USC.

It took a Double OT, but we got there. 144 with 2 mn left in the 2nd OT. So....6-2 straight up for the night taking the Tahoe Train.
 

Riff-Raff

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 9, 2016
2,800
20
0
South Lake Tahoe (CA. Side)
RR; this is probably the last time I will recap a smoking night, as I know KARMA can work in mysterious ways.

Although cashing is all that counts, there is a difference between covering a line and burying a line. So, again, your insight on NCAAM is much appreciated. This is very much a rerun from last night.

5-2 Straight Up and 8-2 +Units.

* (W) Portland/Loyola Marymount (x1) Over 125. Game ended at 142, or +17.

* (W) Belmont/Murray St (x1) Over 147. Game ended at 160, or +13.

* (W) High Point +6 (x1). Game ended at High Point +3 (OT), but HP was up double digits late in the 2nd Half.

* (W) Montana/Idaho St (x3) Over 130. Game ended at 151, or +21.

* (W) UAB/So Miss (x2) Over 125. Game ended at 161, or +36.

* (L) Hofstra -7. Game ended 73 - 71 Delaware.

* (L) Montana -6. Game ended 77 - 74 Montana. Sloppy turnovers in the last 3 minutes blew the cover.

RU

I appreciate the kind words. I work very hard on my College Basketball stuff and expect to make money every year, and believe it or not, my numbers are quite intensive and take a lot out of my free time so positive feedback keeps me interested in continuing to post my plays. I have developed this system with the help of my Uncle (he used to post here years ago and I've tried to coerce him back but he prefers to stay away from posting forums (although he did say he always enjoyed MDJs). One of his most intensive research includes adding/subtracting due to historical data that relates to certain Home Court Advantages or lack thereof.

I have had very lucrative offers to join some large gambling groups, but in all honesty, it's not my thing. There is a guy in Reno that bets strictly NBA games (I have no idea how he does it but his top plays are money in the bank) and that is always a nice addition to my bankroll and one of the few guys I will follow blindly.

Everybody has their own systems and ways of doing things and if it works for you, then that's great. This is the time of year that I really burn the candle at both ends (especially for Sat games) so I've considered not posting but it's comments like yours that makes me feel it's worth it.

It's a bit disingenuous that there are a couple of ass wipes that love to go into my threads and stir shit up if I have a losing day, and what shows their agenda is when I have posted consecutive winning days its crickets :0032.......

At any rate, I'm already working on Saturdays long card, so I'm glad to hear that you are appreciative of my efforts. Good Luck 🤞....
 

gk51

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 9, 2006
118
0
16
Arizona
Riff I also appreciate what you do. I have another set of numbers I use and when they agree with you it is an automatic play. Have hit the last 9 plays that have agreed. Also your plays are here early and am able to beat the line moves. Again thanks for all you do.
 

docwth

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 15, 2010
558
21
18
I appreciate the kind words. I work very hard on my College Basketball stuff and expect to make money every year, and believe it or not, my numbers are quite intensive and take a lot out of my free time so positive feedback keeps me interested in continuing to post my plays. I have developed this system with the help of my Uncle (he used to post here years ago and I've tried to coerce him back but he prefers to stay away from posting forums (although he did say he always enjoyed MDJs). One of his most intensive research includes adding/subtracting due to historical data that relates to certain Home Court Advantages or lack thereof.

I have had very lucrative offers to join some large gambling groups, but in all honesty, it's not my thing. There is a guy in Reno that bets strictly NBA games (I have no idea how he does it but his top plays are money in the bank) and that is always a nice addition to my bankroll and one of the few guys I will follow blindly.

Everybody has their own systems and ways of doing things and if it works for you, then that's great. This is the time of year that I really burn the candle at both ends (especially for Sat games) so I've considered not posting but it's comments like yours that makes me feel it's worth it.

It's a bit disingenuous that there are a couple of ass wipes that love to go into my threads and stir shit up if I have a losing day, and what shows their agenda is when I have posted consecutive winning days its crickets :0032.......

At any rate, I'm already working on Saturdays long card, so I'm glad to hear that you are appreciative of my efforts. Good Luck 🤞....

please don't quit posting because of a few assholes. I follow you everyday and love your posts.:0008:00hour:00hour
 

Riff-Raff

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 9, 2016
2,800
20
0
South Lake Tahoe (CA. Side)
Riff I also appreciate what you do. I have another set of numbers I use and when they agree with you it is an automatic play. Have hit the last 9 plays that have agreed. Also your plays are here early and am able to beat the line moves. Again thanks for all you do.

Thanks to All of you who have posted today.... I appreciate it.

This particular observation caught my attention. It really doesn't do anyone much good to post a play after tremendous line movement (especially for steam moves) but as you can tell, I feel it's imperative to get the best number possible, and anyone doing this for a living or trying to make a decent wage, should have access to the best number and it's the main reason I try to post as early as possible.

I guess it should be pretty obvious that I don't put much stock into line movements, as I make my plays as soon as possible, especially when weak lines are posted. I realize that there is a significant time difference (between East Coast and West) and I don't have any answers, as it's the nature of the beast. I guess if you want access to the best possible line, you better set an alarm clock :00x10

The only time I have ever bought back bets was when Musca pointed out a key injury that I had overlooked (it's one of my weaknesses) because frankly, I don't have time to explore every injury and sometimes there are mixed messages like the So Dak St game the other night. It's really a major factor, but there is more involved than just the aches and pain of one player, because then you need to take a look at the bench and see how those teams played without a Star contributor and it gets very convoluted.

There is a guy in Reno that does pretty well when he sees major movement in all sports (based on obvious bias due to an announced injury) and will often bet against the movement, as he believes most teams which announce an injury, doesn't affect the overall performance of the team and often teams will play harder without that piece of the puzzle. He has more cahones than I do, but it works for him.

Anyway, I have spent more time today posting when I have a ton of work to do for Saturdays Card.

Just want to let you guys know that I do appreciate the positive feedback and thanks (pat on the back) as it reinforces my fortitude in continuing to post. I guess I'm saying "Thanks" for saying "Thanks" :mj03:...... Gl
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top