**** 13---2---1 ATS ****

4bubba

Moderator
Forum Member
Jun 10, 2001
0
0
0
Las Vegas, NV
Thats what the divisional home underdogs have been this year.

Results and writeups in the DIV HOME DOG topic of the "matchups" forum here at MadJackSports.

------------------
indecision is the KEY to flexibility
 

hoya

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 2, 2001
374
0
0
Absolutely amazing. I will NOT ignore these for the rest of the season...I can't afford to.
 

Night Owl

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 4, 2001
264
0
0
Bremerton, WA
With those numbers, I will SPECIFICALLY look to target those plays from now on and obviously with good reason! Do have to say, though, NEVER would have guessed that Washington would kick the G-men all over the field yesterday. To me, that was quite a shock.

Night Owl
 

4bubba

Moderator
Forum Member
Jun 10, 2001
0
0
0
Las Vegas, NV
i made the mistake at first in that I tried to determine which div home dogs would follow the trend and which wouldnt. that was wrong. Dont even think about it. Go with the trend.

------------------
indecision is the KEY to flexibility
 

NJO

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 24, 2001
546
0
0
Milwaukee, WI
that is an amazing stat.

but, is it necessarily wise to back it blindly from here on out?

don't you think there could be some "reversion to the mean"?

by that, I mean it is very unlikely this trend will continue to win at an 87% clip - if this number ends up at 60% (still a fine number), that means backing it from here on out (without having backed it to this point) results in a net loss of 27%.

just something to think about.
 

4bubba

Moderator
Forum Member
Jun 10, 2001
0
0
0
Las Vegas, NV
I am not promising anything. Last week I thought no way was Wash going to beat NYG.
Any trend can lose on any given Sun. If nothing else, you might consider not betting against the trend.

------------------
indecision is the KEY to flexibility
 

pepin46

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 6, 2000
525
0
0
miami, fl.
very well put, bubba. at the very least, try to avoid going against such a strong trend. it is really a case for study, as the home dog is the weaker team, yet the game carries such importance due to many factors, that it makes the game in theory a pick'em, and in many cases, like yesterday, the visiting favorite is "stunned". yet the line has to be set according to performance and betting patterns.

i wanted to use this thread to bring up what i think is the most meaningful trend, or at least as important as this one:

a team's domination of another team. when all pieces remain the same (players, coaching, etc.) and a team has shown over and over it can beat the other one, going against it is trying to defy logic. there are recent exceptions, like the debacle with philly/giants.

the one recent example was n.o./st louis. i was "watching" it on stats and left in disgust when st louis was ahead 21-3 early in the second quarter. the rest is history. miami at jets, indy at n.e., etc.

today we face a similar situation with tenn's dominance over pitt, yet pitt is the favorite due to recent performance and home advantage, a turn around in the line of about 5-6 points. this game is not set in stone, but it does falls in that other strong trend category.


pep
 

TORONTO-VIGILANTE

ad interim...
Forum Member
Dec 27, 2000
16,122
3
0
50
"...Quo fas et gloria ducunt..."
will be looking at this trend closer...
smile.gif


I would usually look at a DIV matchup and the dog was -7.0 points or more and take the DOG....

hmmmmmmmmmmmm...13-2-1...??? wow.
 

Statman02

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 29, 2000
1,063
8
38
I make it 13/4/1 still a great trend.....correct me if I'm wrong...

9-9 NYJ v Indy +3 L 24-45
9-9 KC v Oak +3 Push 24-27
9-23 SF v STL +6.5 W 26-30
9-23 NE v NYJ +2 L 3-10
9-23 Cinn v Balt +7 W 21-10
9-23 Chi v Minn +3 W 17-10
9-30 NE v Indy +12 W 44-13
9-30 Minn v TB +2.5 W 20-16
10-07 Buff v NYJ +4 L 36-42
10-14 Sea v Den +6 W 34-21
10-14 NYJ v Mia +3 W 21-17
10-14 Carol v NO +6 W 25-27
10-14 Atl v SF +3 L 31-37
10-21 SD v Den +3 W 27-10
10-21 Minn v GB +3.5 W 35-13
10-21 Cleve v Balt +7.5 W 24-14
10-28 Wash v NYG +8 W 35-21
10-28 Dall v Ariz +3 W 17-3



[This message has been edited by Statman02 (edited 10-29-2001).]
 

4bubba

Moderator
Forum Member
Jun 10, 2001
0
0
0
Las Vegas, NV
Statman, as I indicated in an earlier article, I only use openning lines for trends. Thats where the linemaker puts the teams. Because the lines can change from place to place, I just use openning for consistancy.
Week 1 (9/9/01) The Colts (+1) @ JETS (-1) at openning
Week 2 (9/23/01) the JETS @ NE openned at PICK.

Neither game fell in this trend group. Good work on keeping up on stats. It can be difficult.

------------------
indecision is the KEY to flexibility

[This message has been edited by 4bubba (edited 11-01-2001).]
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top