Hey, where's the weeders? Ya didn't have to do much weeding on the Men's side for my 1st round listing:
Moya (+180, wow), Agassi (-250 or sumthin like that), Ginepri (-270), Massu (-230)>>> > ALL WINAHS:jump:
Oh, yeah.. almost fergots - Johansson (+130) LOSAH. Doncha just hate losing them 5-7 and 6-7 sets? I seem to be on the losing side of those sets all too often.
Now for the first round Women's side, first round picks. Well, you woulda needed a derrick to get to the winners cause Sperm ...er, Sprem (+148) and Castano (-165 phoooey) lost. Anybody had the ba..er, guts to go on Shiavone with me at -400. Can't blame if ya didn't. But she won.
OK, here's today's THOROUGHLY analyzed picks:
AGASSI +170 vs. Baghie : This one very much looks like talent a plenty, brains, experience a plenty, but maybe broken (physically) vs. pretty decent talent, no brains (strategy), poor coaching, medium experience, talent a plenty, not sure about any ailments. So, add it up and play Agassi at these odds. Ain't cortisone (not sure bout the spelling, but you get my drift. Never touched the stuff) wonderful?
MASSU +148 vs. Youznhy: These two are even Stephen. Elements of their games are very close, in fact only edge that I PLAY particular attention to is serves and that goes double on hard court action - Massu has an edge here in that category. Nice looking play here at REALLY attractive odds.
FERRER -380 (think you might see better odds later today) : He just outclasses Gimel and his US Open record outclasse Gimel a LOT. Odds too low?... use him as a parlay stuffer.
Misc. stuff:
Anybody see prop. odds on Roddick to win the Open? Think more and more "experts" and bettors are thinking he has a shot and I'm about to jump on the gravy train. That is - THE FIELD wins, NOT Roddick. That's cause I think he has NO shot. Connors may have helped his tennis game, but its gonna take a shrink to get his mind where it needs to be to win this thing. Hey, anybody see John Rocker around?
Good luck with these.
(edited to fix the "underline code" where "Misc. stuff" is)
Moya (+180, wow), Agassi (-250 or sumthin like that), Ginepri (-270), Massu (-230)>>> > ALL WINAHS:jump:
Oh, yeah.. almost fergots - Johansson (+130) LOSAH. Doncha just hate losing them 5-7 and 6-7 sets? I seem to be on the losing side of those sets all too often.
Now for the first round Women's side, first round picks. Well, you woulda needed a derrick to get to the winners cause Sperm ...er, Sprem (+148) and Castano (-165 phoooey) lost. Anybody had the ba..er, guts to go on Shiavone with me at -400. Can't blame if ya didn't. But she won.
OK, here's today's THOROUGHLY analyzed picks:
AGASSI +170 vs. Baghie : This one very much looks like talent a plenty, brains, experience a plenty, but maybe broken (physically) vs. pretty decent talent, no brains (strategy), poor coaching, medium experience, talent a plenty, not sure about any ailments. So, add it up and play Agassi at these odds. Ain't cortisone (not sure bout the spelling, but you get my drift. Never touched the stuff) wonderful?
MASSU +148 vs. Youznhy: These two are even Stephen. Elements of their games are very close, in fact only edge that I PLAY particular attention to is serves and that goes double on hard court action - Massu has an edge here in that category. Nice looking play here at REALLY attractive odds.
FERRER -380 (think you might see better odds later today) : He just outclasses Gimel and his US Open record outclasse Gimel a LOT. Odds too low?... use him as a parlay stuffer.
Misc. stuff:
Anybody see prop. odds on Roddick to win the Open? Think more and more "experts" and bettors are thinking he has a shot and I'm about to jump on the gravy train. That is - THE FIELD wins, NOT Roddick. That's cause I think he has NO shot. Connors may have helped his tennis game, but its gonna take a shrink to get his mind where it needs to be to win this thing. Hey, anybody see John Rocker around?
Good luck with these.
(edited to fix the "underline code" where "Misc. stuff" is)
Last edited:
