tb@Pit
I haven't seen any line on this game, yet. I was thinking an under might be a good go, here, before Monday's action started. I've watched the first two periods of tb@Columbus and this game (1-1 after 2) has been a defensive masterpiece by both clubs. It's Curtis in net, tonight, for Lightning, and Vasi should be going tomorrow--definitely. I was seeing Jarry as a likely for Pens, earlier (goaliepost dot com) but now they suggest maybe Murray. While I'd prefer Jarry for the under, the Lightning will be on back-to-back AND Steven Stamkos didn't make the trip, at all, due to injury (and he's been very hot; I believe 15 points over last 10). I'm looking for a regulation under6, if I can get it; obviously, I'd prefer that to the under6 (if available) including ot as a 3-3 draw after reggae spells doom on the 6. Lightning powerplay, as well (commentator stated), is 0-for-their last 22.
nyr@Wpg
Rangers are allegedly going with rookie Igor in net (fuck trying to spell these last names from memory...this guy is too fresh to have burned in there). If the Rangers finish the season strong they could sneak into the playoffs. Jets have been trash at home this year, surprisingly. Mind you, I was tempted to fade them at home in their last, vs the high-variance Blackhawks ('Hawks were up 2-0, I believe (very good 1st period team, those 'Hawks), before getting stomped afterwards). Rangers +112 ot or +175 for a reggae win transcends tempting (almost, at least...haven't pulled trigger, yet. Either that or the under is going to hit, I believe (seeing un6.5 ot at -108, with the (again) preferred un 6 regulation at -103). I'm doing something, here. Both might hit, as the Rangers haven't scored more than 3 on the road in their past 5. That note doesn't make the Rangers appealing, it must be said, and the Jets might be getting their shit in order, not to mention that I'd include them in a list of very high variance teams (i.e lowering the confidence in any side that features them).
How the bleep do the Canadiens blow this game vs Coyotes?
I hate betting on the Habs. Correction: I hate the Habs. It's in the blood.
GL
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/sp86SkWKRQE" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>
I ain't (?!)
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/8gNNFCo9VF4" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>
fade-out in that 1st copy of Stevie was dogshit. More tolerable here.
I haven't seen any line on this game, yet. I was thinking an under might be a good go, here, before Monday's action started. I've watched the first two periods of tb@Columbus and this game (1-1 after 2) has been a defensive masterpiece by both clubs. It's Curtis in net, tonight, for Lightning, and Vasi should be going tomorrow--definitely. I was seeing Jarry as a likely for Pens, earlier (goaliepost dot com) but now they suggest maybe Murray. While I'd prefer Jarry for the under, the Lightning will be on back-to-back AND Steven Stamkos didn't make the trip, at all, due to injury (and he's been very hot; I believe 15 points over last 10). I'm looking for a regulation under6, if I can get it; obviously, I'd prefer that to the under6 (if available) including ot as a 3-3 draw after reggae spells doom on the 6. Lightning powerplay, as well (commentator stated), is 0-for-their last 22.
nyr@Wpg
Rangers are allegedly going with rookie Igor in net (fuck trying to spell these last names from memory...this guy is too fresh to have burned in there). If the Rangers finish the season strong they could sneak into the playoffs. Jets have been trash at home this year, surprisingly. Mind you, I was tempted to fade them at home in their last, vs the high-variance Blackhawks ('Hawks were up 2-0, I believe (very good 1st period team, those 'Hawks), before getting stomped afterwards). Rangers +112 ot or +175 for a reggae win transcends tempting (almost, at least...haven't pulled trigger, yet. Either that or the under is going to hit, I believe (seeing un6.5 ot at -108, with the (again) preferred un 6 regulation at -103). I'm doing something, here. Both might hit, as the Rangers haven't scored more than 3 on the road in their past 5. That note doesn't make the Rangers appealing, it must be said, and the Jets might be getting their shit in order, not to mention that I'd include them in a list of very high variance teams (i.e lowering the confidence in any side that features them).
How the bleep do the Canadiens blow this game vs Coyotes?
I hate betting on the Habs. Correction: I hate the Habs. It's in the blood.
GL
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/sp86SkWKRQE" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>
I ain't (?!)
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/8gNNFCo9VF4" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>
fade-out in that 1st copy of Stevie was dogshit. More tolerable here.
Last edited:
