A Horrible TM? I am all over the S-Hawks

SKEETER1

SKEETER1
Forum Member
Aug 12, 2001
2,256
4
0
63
Phoenix
Dont blame me if ya lose this is my opinion..I am taking the seahawks and dont tell me they R a terrible football tm...I dont buy it...just like some of U guys who said I was so wrong saying the Bears wouldnt cover and R overrated...Overrated concerning the Bears is a topic of Off coordinator...I have seen these same freaking plays yr after yr week after week....U kiip playing the Bears against the top rated tms and I will bet opposite of ya....I luv the Bears but this offense is soooooo predictable....Until the Bears prov they can score in the RED zone and stop running the damn ball with the same plays I have seen over the past 16 ys I dont believe...this tm cant go anywhere kicking FG's...Hey Miller when ya get the play nod and get in the huddle and throw the freaking ball down the field...not 10-20 yrds I mean like 40 yds and open up the running game...tell the off corrd to kiss off and then ask..would ya rather have Matthews in there...or make a trade and bring Cade bk....throw it long JIM
 
I

Investment Executive

Guest
I thought re-runs we only on cable?......

nice call on the green bay Skeeter!!
 

Night Owl

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 4, 2001
264
0
0
Bremerton, WA
Skeeter, I am a lifelong Seattle fan and live in the area, so I wish you the best of luck with the Seahawks + the points but if Oakland brings their A game, I think they will handle this Seahawk team WITH EASE! You speak of play-calling with Chicago....well it's a similar problem here. Seattle week after week has several 3rd and 9 situations for example, and TIME AFTER TIME they throw the ball 4 and 5 yards....run draws, etc. and do not pick up the first down. Also look for cornerback Willie Williams to absolutely get toasted by either Brown or Rice -- whoever he matches up with. The Seattle corners usually give tons of room to opposing WRs, making the chore of picking up first downs, etc less difficult than it should be. It is a nationally televised game vs. a division "rival" so I expect the emotion to be there for Seattle this week and they're gonna need it because sheer ability vs. ability, the Raiders and Hawks are night and day....worlds apart! Hasselbeck is very mistake prone and Seattle has only had success when they've been able to get their running game going. Not good news here as Oakland is 3rd I believe it is against the run. In the end, I think the bottom line is going to come down to Gannon's ability to make plays and Hasselbeck's inability to do the same. Terrible team? Maybe not "terrible" but I don't see anything stopping Oakland from winning this game by at least 7+ Just my take on it. Good luck all.

Night Owl
 

SKEETER1

SKEETER1
Forum Member
Aug 12, 2001
2,256
4
0
63
Phoenix
Thx invest exec. apprech...and night owlI see what ur saying with Hasselback...he only goes when the running gm is going...thank goodness the running gm came to town...GL to ya guys
Originally posted by Investment Executive:
I thought re-runs we only on cable?......

nice call on the green bay Skeeter!!
 

Night Owl

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 4, 2001
264
0
0
Bremerton, WA
Skeeter, congrats on both Green Bay and Seattle. Very nice job on your part. I Obviously did not expect the outcome to be what it was and although I'm never particularly pleased to lose a bet, I do hate the Raiders and would like to see my team make the playoffs for a change so I'll take it from that standpoint. Guess I better think twice before betting against Alexander the Great from now on?
smile.gif
Continued best of luck to you.

Night Owl
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top