Are the Mets and Tigers too obvious picks? Nah

MB MLB 728x90 Jpg

grey beard

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 20, 2003
485
1
0
Leesburg Va
Santana is having his typicaly season and has mastered the Yanks in the past..and this Yankee team isn't as good as the the past. Matsui being out hurts their lineup. Also, Yanks can't manufacture runs..Mets can..Petitte about 1/2 of what he was 5 years ago...surprised the line is as low as it is at -121...Mets 6 Yanks 3. And it's close late, like Wagner to close it down.

Tigers -169, Beter starter, better hitters, hot team at home..against a pitcher in a slump, team treading water from the Weakest divsion in baseball..so I have to take the obvious..just don't see any scenario where the Tigers lose this one..I normally don't like heavy favorites but at this moment can't find a good dog.
 

grey beard

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 20, 2003
485
1
0
Leesburg Va
Add the Nasty Nats at a pick

Add the Nasty Nats at a pick

This one is an ugly one..Os loss of Huff as a DH hurts their lineup which is based on a lot of good hiters but none great..Nats have Boone back who's hitting very well this season..replaced their head case 2nd baseman Lopez with a guy hitting really well..two starters both pitching well...just think the NATS have righted a very bad ship with the right mix of players for the 1st time in a long time..while the Os just don't look right playing NL baseball..NATS 6 Os 2.
 
Top