...so that it will assure Obama of winning? I mean they are unusually awful.
smurphy cartographer Channel Member Jul 31, 2004 19,896 133 63 16 L.A. Nov 3, 2008 #1 ...so that it will assure Obama of winning? I mean they are unusually awful.
rusty Registered User Forum Member Nov 24, 2006 4,627 11 0 Under a mask. Nov 3, 2008 #2 smurphy said: ...so that it will assure Obama of winning? I mean they are unusually awful. Click to expand... Whats the history on that??:mj07: :0corn
smurphy said: ...so that it will assure Obama of winning? I mean they are unusually awful. Click to expand... Whats the history on that??:mj07: :0corn
smurphy cartographer Channel Member Jul 31, 2004 19,896 133 63 16 L.A. Nov 3, 2008 #3 17 straight elections - If Skins win home game previous to election the incumbent party wins. If they lose, incumbents lose. I think they are on the take for Obama.
17 straight elections - If Skins win home game previous to election the incumbent party wins. If they lose, incumbents lose. I think they are on the take for Obama.
rusty Registered User Forum Member Nov 24, 2006 4,627 11 0 Under a mask. Nov 3, 2008 #4 smurphy said: 17 straight elections - If Skins win home game previous to election the incumbent party wins. If they lose, incumbents lose. I think they are on the take for Obama. Click to expand... Sick-I got roeslinberger going against me in fantasy. He needed 14 pts got 7,then got injured,id be 6-3 with the win!!:00hour . I do like the Skins thou.
smurphy said: 17 straight elections - If Skins win home game previous to election the incumbent party wins. If they lose, incumbents lose. I think they are on the take for Obama. Click to expand... Sick-I got roeslinberger going against me in fantasy. He needed 14 pts got 7,then got injured,id be 6-3 with the win!!:00hour . I do like the Skins thou.