ATS for winner or loser after triple OT?

layinwood

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2001
4,771
40
0
Dallas, TX
I've looked but couldn't find anything. Does anyone know if there are any good ATS trends for the winners or losers after a triple OT game?
 

capping-guru

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 3, 2011
8,888
26
0
Betting against teams that won or lost in 3OT or longer is a great go against angle over the years. I dont know what the numbers are but they hit at a high clip!
 

saint

Go Heels
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
9,501
140
63
Balls Deep
I'm not so sure about that.

In 2011, I just did an audit.

Teams that went to double or triple overtime, the following week, were:

11-1 ATS :scared

I'm going to check for single OT and also run back a few more years-

Started 2010, ATS back down to 4-6. doh
 
Last edited:

layinwood

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2001
4,771
40
0
Dallas, TX
I'm not so sure about that.

In 2011, I just did an audit.

Teams that went to double or triple overtime, the following week, were:

11-1 ATS :scared

I'm going to check for single OT and also run back a few more years-

Started 2010, ATS back down to 4-6. doh


Saint, so double or triple OT teams won at a rate of 11 and 1 ats?

My reason for asking was because I was talking to a friend about both Tech and TCU and the next week. We talked about how dead they must be but in all reality how many more plays did each player play. It's not like the whole team was out there for 3 OTs. There really weren't that many more plays for each player and in all reality that's what matters.

I just wonder if there's anything in the number that reflects an overreaction by bettors?

For the record, I'm not saying there is just looking deeper.
 

saint

Go Heels
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
9,501
140
63
Balls Deep
Saint, so double or triple OT teams won at a rate of 11 and 1 ats?

My reason for asking was because I was talking to a friend about both Tech and TCU and the next week. We talked about how dead they must be but in all reality how many more plays did each player play. It's not like the whole team was out there for 3 OTs. There really weren't that many more plays for each player and in all reality that's what matters.

I just wonder if there's anything in the number that reflects an overreaction by bettors?

For the record, I'm not saying there is just looking deeper.

Yes but halfway through 2010 and it was 4-6 ATS.

That's why sample size is important. These are college kids, I don't think it matters with a week in between games but it was a good angle to explore- I also check over/unders but so far no correlation.
 

capping-guru

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 3, 2011
8,888
26
0
I'm not so sure about that.

In 2011, I just did an audit.

Teams that went to double or triple overtime, the following week, were:

11-1 ATS :scared

I'm going to check for single OT and also run back a few more years-

Started 2010, ATS back down to 4-6. doh

damn, that is crazy!!:scared
 

kenman

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 17, 2002
2,400
10
38
East Coast
here the result from the sports database ...

Since 2007, Away Dog that when to 2 or more OT and Won ... Next game

SU: 7-5-0 (0.25, 58.3%)
ATS: 11-1-0 (10.79, 91.7%) avg line: 10.5
O/U: 4-8-0 (-3.96, 33.3%) avg total: 51.4

Tx Tech+7
SALA+24


Since 2007, Away Dog that when to 2 or more OT and Lost ... Next game

SU: 0-10-0 (-28.60, 0.0%)
ATS: 3-7-0 (-10.05, 30.0%) avg line: 18.6
O/U: 7-2-1 (-0.25, 77.8%) avg total: 52.2

TCU --- Take OK ST-7.5
 

layinwood

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2001
4,771
40
0
Dallas, TX
I won't take Tech this week because I don't feel like dealing with both the game and a play on them. To me as a fan it adds more pressure and I don't like that in big games. I want to root for them to win the game. I find that in times where the line is around 7 and you have a big play on it you end up rooting for them to do things that are in the best interest of the covering and not winning.

Tubs said the players have been very focused this week in practice. Last Monday they weren't and that's why he closed practice and after to media.

#1 CB Douglas is around 85% and could play in spots

Starting Nickle DB and by far their most physical CB Porter is around 95%

Starting slot WR(TE) Amaro is going to be a game time decision.

Those three guys missed last week and it hurt but will hurt more this week. Douglas is a corner that loves to get in and make tackles. Porter is the exact same way and actually acts like a LB when he's out there. Without those two facing Klein and his ability to run will hurt big time. Will post more if I find out more.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top