Ok have looked over the officle rules of the contest. I am not siding with anyone nor do i hold a vested intrest in it. I looked at it just like a team rule or contract to see if there was any violation.
Well he was given a bet after asking jack and messing around over and over for his own spot. Jack said if you can make 60 bets on best bettor and end up in the + side then your in.
After that a few side bets were made which would include the above agreement as the official rules all that was stated was 60 plays and be in the + side and he could take as long as he wanted. Now if the parties of the side bets wanted to add some amendments to their contest it should of been stated before the start. Since nothing was brought up as a stipulation prior to the start of the side bets for contest beantownjim is in the right to act like a sloth if he wants with the remainder of his plays.
Sorry but those were the rules and when looking at a contact there is no room for ethics it's cut and dry as to original agreement.
Ruling in favor of beantownjim.
Well he was given a bet after asking jack and messing around over and over for his own spot. Jack said if you can make 60 bets on best bettor and end up in the + side then your in.
After that a few side bets were made which would include the above agreement as the official rules all that was stated was 60 plays and be in the + side and he could take as long as he wanted. Now if the parties of the side bets wanted to add some amendments to their contest it should of been stated before the start. Since nothing was brought up as a stipulation prior to the start of the side bets for contest beantownjim is in the right to act like a sloth if he wants with the remainder of his plays.
Sorry but those were the rules and when looking at a contact there is no room for ethics it's cut and dry as to original agreement.
Ruling in favor of beantownjim.