Been Digging II

lostinamerica

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 10, 2001
7,292
167
63
Between Green Bay and Iowa City
It was not hard to notice that there was lots of exceptional handicapping of the wildcard games going on in this forum. Very cool, and keep it going. Maybe all this new technology had something to do with it. :toast:


Dug this up:

If I am not mistaken in my numbers, from 1993-2000, the home team off the bye (Carolina was the only home dog in 1996) in the Divisional Round of the NFC playoffs has been 11-4-1 ATS. What is interesting is that 2 of the 4 visitors that covered were Favre led Packer's teams (+14 at Dallas in 1993, and +10 at SF in 1995); moreover, the push also involved the Packers (-14 while hosting TB in 1997). I couldn't resist sharing that.


--------------------------------------------------

PHILADELPHIA vs. CHICAGO

Lots of reasons for me to think the Bears will have their hands full in this one.

With three games and counting from last year and this year, this Eagle's team has become an experienced playoff team. A talented team that shows as much heart and effort as any I see. Against most any opponent, I think the talented and aggressive Philadelphia defense can find individual matchups to exploit in order to make plays, contain the run, pressure the QB, whatever needs doing. McNabb's playmaking and the weapons he has to go to give this team a dimension that makes me take notice. For good measure, the Eagles have been 7-1 road warriors this season.

While the Bears may be productive with their power running game (missing suspended FB Shelton), will the Bears find success in scoring points, too? I think the bigger potential for gaining significant advantages in the game lie with McNabb in the passing game, and the Eagle's pass defense against QB Jim Miller.

It may be wildly inaccurate to compare the Eagle's version of the west coast offense under Mcnabb to the Packers and 49ers among the Bear's foes this year, but if such a comparison has any merit, Chicago came within seconds of being 0-3 against those opponents.

Hopefully, Philadelphia will be primed to avoid something like the 97 yard kickoff return that set them up in a hole to start the playoff game against the Giants last year. Maybe turn the tables this time with their highly regarded special teams, which should nevertheless hold their own throughout in any crucial battle for field position that could develop.

In my handicapping, I am of the opinion that the end of the season scrimmage against Tampa was seized by the Philadelphia coaches as a reasonable facsimilie for a bye, and now Philadelphia heads to Chicago with a head of steam after the early game last Saturday. And while Chicago's coaches spent the bye week uncertain whether to prepare for Philadelphia, GB or SF, Philadelphia had 3 weeks to prepare for Tampa (before September 11th, before the closing scrimmage, and before the wildcard game), and their coaching staff confessed they had a good opportunity to peek at Chicago, which was the only possible opponent next in their path.

The Bears caught my attention early on, and I had nothing but kind words and high expectations for them as they came down the stretch without a misstep. Incredibly consistent, they even elevated their play like a champion to close the season. Now we will get to see if there was some measure of overachieving in their 13-3 campaign, and how much more they can elevate their play in the post season when facing the best and the hungriest teams in the league.

I know that when the Bears looked to take it up a notch or three against the Packers, they came up wanting. And I don't know what their fans are smoking, but I see no resemblance whatsoever between the Bears 29th rated pass defense and the suffocating defense that took the Ravens from nowhere to the Lombardi Trophy in a single season. And I fail to see how the Bears benefited by "calling out" a preference for a Packers rematch before Coach Jauron told them to quit being so stupid.

I sure don't think the Bears are the type of NFC heavyweight, or the circumstances of this game are such, that get me believing this game will follow a solid trend of home favorites winning by double digits in this round of the NFC playoffs.

I may be wrong, but I sense an emotiomnal edge for the Eagles, at least in the sense of bringing that emotion to their playmaking for 60 minutes of football.

The Bears have been magic and much more throughout the season. This week I expect Chicago to be tough and prepared and emotional. I don't think they are being underestimated by me or by the Eagles. I look for the Eagles to be relentless.

A live dog here.


--------------------------------------------------

OAKLAND vs. NEW ENGLAND

Coming down the stretch, Oakland was leaking oil all the way. They are now coming off a stretch of 3 tough contests (at Denver, Jets and Jets). Lucky for them they were dealt a tough hand to beat in the wildcard round. Rejuvenated? Not long for this tournament, I'd say.

This New England team has certainly come out of nowhere. Confident and consistent for weeks, they are now becoming extremely efficient with their opportunities, and they have to be as fresh and rested as any team out there. Great chemistry, too. Worthy challengers to the Bears for the feel good surprise of the year, and in any Belichick vs. Jauron coach of the year debate. I'm not sure any "Farewell to Foxboro II" karma is required. A lack of post season experience is the one caution flag I am holding.

The clincher for me is that I fully expect the home team to bring a hard charging and disciplined defense that understands the Raider attack and will be able to hold it in check, while I suspect the visitors are not so tough.

With a line of less than -3, the public appears to be on the Raiders. Give me the Patriots.
 

lostinamerica

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 10, 2001
7,292
167
63
Between Green Bay and Iowa City
BALTIMORE vs. PITTSBURGH

To no one's real surprise, it's been a long season for Baltimore, and they had some flaws exposed. To no one's real surprise, the champs look a bit removed from the standards of last year on both sides of the ball. That pitiful performance by Miami last week was just that.

Also to no one's real surprise, it looks like the Ravens can turn up their play and their abrasive arrogance a notch during the post season. If you have this team hanging around within a field goal in a low scoring game in the fourth quarter, I'd say you likely have a problem on your hands.

In what appeared to me to be two of Baltimore's more sustained and focused efforts of the regular season, I twice watched Pittsburgh have their way with them in most every area but the scoreboard. I don't think it is a leap to think Pittsburgh matches up well with Baltimore in the trenches and in the skill positions. Kordell Stewart will get sufficient opportunities to make a difference and put his team in charge of this contest, and his judgment and play in those situations this year has me taking Pittsburgh as the side to favor here.

Baltimore lost four times in their division this year. These folks know each other well, and Pittsburgh should be unfazed by the characteristic garbage coming from the Ravens.

I expect that a hungry and ambitious contender will set the champs down in appropriate fashion. It can't come soon enough to suit me. I hope I am right in pegging Pittsburgh as such a team.
 

Hooks

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 14, 2000
3,058
13
0
VEGAS
I'm finalizing my selections and will be putting them in soon.
You've done a very nice job lostinamerica:cool:
I've made my decision to play Philly +3.Philly has been taking steps forward to go to the BOWL. This is their next step. they are a very confident TEAM,going 7-1 away this year.The D. needs to hold the A-Train in check. If they do they WIN.

However in the Oakland/N.E. game as much as I'd like to see the Patriots win,I've got to play the Raiders, because of the head coach,Q.B.,experience of the team,and the points.The Patriots will play conservative.I think the Raiders will be more apt to go for the longball and Gannon to his recievers CAN get it done.The under is worth a look also.
And probably the most important reason:coming within 1 game of the SUPERBOWL last year:nono:

I wish us all to cash-NO SHITTY CALLS BY DEM REFS:thefinger
 

lostinamerica

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 10, 2001
7,292
167
63
Between Green Bay and Iowa City
GREEN BAY vs. ST. LOUIS

I love the Packers like you love your children - not because they are perfect, but because they are yours.

"The only team that can beat the Rams is the Rams."
To generate interest in this game, I suggest the Rams offense should square off against the Rams defense, while the hapless Packers watch from the sidelines.

Seriously, how do the Packers derail or slow down the Ram's coronation? If I have any clue at all, it's that it won't be easy.

Last week, my mother could have recited just a few of the angles that said the Packers were the team to play. This week, I hope my mother is praying for me.

Since time is running short, and there is a tremendous weekend of football ahead that I look to enjoy, I need a shortcut. So, I'm going to lean on a link to a "dead on" analysis of the Packers approach to this game. It's worth your time.

http://espn.go.com/nfl//playoffs01/columns/oates_tom/1313455.html

At least several problems still remain. First, those strengths the Packers want to play to are by design better suited to challenging the Rams on the tundra in Green Bay than, in my opinion, to playing any playoff caliber team in a dome. Second, if there is one sports cliche you can take to the bank, it might be "speed never has an off day;" the Rams have more of it, and they rely on it, even on defense. Third, even at their best, the Packers are good for a few whiffed tackles, and the results from those on Sunday could be disheartening in the extreme.

To sum up on defense, the Rams have a lot of weapons, but at least there is only one football. Maybe get the Rams offense a little impatient and see what that leads to. Give 'em hell, guys.

Defense is huge, but I happen to believe the real key will be the Packers ability to generate about 33 points (chance to win) or 27 points (chance to cover). The Rams defense makes too many plays to focus on ball control, so I expect the Packers will try to mix in all their weapons and hurt the Rams on the scoreboard. Not that some ball control would hurt their chances.

The offensive line has played the best of any Favre has had in his years with the Packers. If the Packers are going to show a physical and mental toughness in this game, it needs to show right here. Having said that, I cannot describe how atrocious the OL was this year in the Metrodome; in that hostile environment and against a defense that relied on its speed, the OL was inept in even communicating among themselves about what they were trying to get done. The play of this group is the anchor for everything the Packers hope to accomplish over 60 minutes in this game. I will repeat that: The play of the offensive line is the anchor for everything the Packers hope to accomplish over 60 minutes in this game. Get it done, guys.

In a big game match up, Brett Favre's right arm (and the whole player attached to it) is always the weapon that gives the other team something to fear. It has been that way for sometime. Give 'em hell, Brett.

Spirited play from an underachieving group of special teams units may be another avenue for doing some damage. Why not, guys?

I'll leave it to someone else to tell you how the Rams plan to react to, or just ignore, all of this stuff.

What else? Foil or endure some trick plays. At least this isn't a stadium that the Packers come to with a lot of baggage, like the Metrodome. I know the Packers are turned on by the challenge and the opportunity of this game, and that should bring some extra shots of resilience when it is needed.

That's about as much as I can muster.

If you were paying me for my advice, I'd tell you:
No. 1: I like the Over.
No. 2: Lay it on the Lambs.
No. 3: I hope I'm wrong about No. 2.

GL
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top