bets by the quarter

[MadJack]

i'm taking all of these for the same amount but realize a lot of people can't/won't make this many bets so i rated them. lines received at rio and cris.

jax pk +145 1Q (good value with the +145--jax should be the slight fave)
gb pk -130 1Q (solid)
den pk +110 2Q (very strong)
dal over 10 +100 2Q (solid)
ne -3 +120 2Q (solid)
sf pk -120 2Q (solid)
stl -3 -130 2Q (very strong)
phi over 10 +105 2Q (solid)
jax over 7 +120 3Q (solid)
pit -3 +165 3Q (great value)
oak over 7 -145 3Q (very strong)

 

[TJBELL]

DAMN!! good luck!!!

 

[Scarecrow]

Jack....

Dumb question?

Your ratings top to bottom:

solid
very strong
great value
good value

Correct?

SC

 

[MadJack]

if i was going to be more selective, i'd play them in this order:

very strong
solid
good and great value = the same

sorry for the confusion.



[This message has been edited by MadJack (edited 01-06-2002).]

 

[jmizeus]

Jack, wondering-how that system worked for ya last week??

gl-MIZE

 

[MadJack]

last weeks results with this strategy.

JET -3 +140 1st quarter (500/700) PUSH
MINN +3.5 -110 2nd quarter (550/500) LOSS
BUF +3 -105 2nd quarter (515/500) WIN
CHI -1 -115 2nd quarter (575/500) WIN
CHI under 13 -130 3rd quarter (650/500) WIN
CLE +3 -115 2nd quarter (575/500) WIN
KC under 13 -115 2nd quarter (575/500) LOSS
JAX -.5 -105 3rd quarter (515/500) LOSS
JAX over 7 -115 3rd quarter (575/500) WIN
WAS +.5 1st quarter (550/500) LOSS

5-4-1 total for the week, ALTHOUGH

the 1Q jets could have been a WIN if you took the jets -1/2 which was offered at most books. i went for the big juice and pushed and MINN was +4 near gametime but i counted it as a loss, so it could have been and should have been 6-3-1

the best plays (in bold) went 3-1