Boxing; 06/30/2006; Cazares-Guillen

frank s.

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 11, 2004
1,874
5
0
Like the UNDER 6.5-115 here. Basically, Guillen is a scrub. Small play here. True, Cazares is no top shelf
commodity; Guillen's pedigree is atrocious. Last 2 guys he fights 0-5!.Guillen has 33 whacks out of 36 wins, 44 bouts in all. However, the guys he beats are some sorry asses. Both he and Cazares have a high KO %, I feel Cazares is much better.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,495
256
83
Victory Lane
franky

Any tats on the rat bastid ?

I am not one to complain, and its really none of my business , but did you notice how your threads are almost identical to BOXLOCKS
in the description ?

just wondering if you realized that.

no biggie , I think you have copied things in my threads also.
 

frank s.

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 11, 2004
1,874
5
0
Actually, I realize you are immature, and seem to be bent on provoking people for no apparent reason. I have overlooked it as there is no profit in trading insults, howeve :nono: r, EAT SHIT!
 

BOXLOCKS

boxlox23
Forum Member
Sep 14, 2002
5,388
36
48
Scrapology
discord.gg
frankie

I always give youl my honest opinion of the plays you post, and I try to supply all the information and angles I use to make my decision on the fight in question. Since you already have a lean on these fights, I don't focus on reasons why your play will win b/c you already know. So I take the other side of the arguement in an attempt to bring all possible information to the surface. Unfortunatly, when I do this it looks like I'm criticizing you or your play, and that is not my intention at all. Hope you know that I respect your opinion and I'm just "role playing" if you will in an attempt to cover all sides before placing a wager.

Just wanted to clear that up...

Anyway

In this case, I can't take the other side b/c there is no other side. Cazares will take this guy out, its just a matter of time, and I'm thinking sooner than later. At -115 you almost have to play it, Guillen is 37 and has been stopped several times by equal and lessor punchers than Cazares who was ranked the biggest puncher 108 by Ring magazine. The only thing that could scare you off is the low # of rounds, 6.5 doesn't give you much room to play with if the opponent is scared and refuses to engage. BUT, I don't think that will be the case as Guillen is a slugger not a boxer. I actually think Cazares could get caught early if he's not careful, he's been stopped a couple times himself.

I think the Under 6.5 at -115 is a solid play, waiting to see if 5dimes will put out props on that fight.

Btw, a guy I respect at another site likes the Under also

gl frank

bl
 

frank s.

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 11, 2004
1,874
5
0
I always want to hear other opinions, otherwise I would'nt bother posting. I know I sometimes don't cross all the t's, etc. Examining another guys play and possibly not being in agreement, to me is not criticizing the man, but the play. To shoot personal remarks at a guy is different. I know you are a student of the game, as is GW, spread, and many others here. Please, don't ever hesitate to pick apart any opinion of mine ever.
 

amhlilhaus

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 14, 2005
267
1
0
at -115 with all the conditions, it's a no brainer play, make it -200 then you have to re think things. good luck
 

frank s.

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 11, 2004
1,874
5
0
They should all be that easy to read. Also, after seeing the weigh in photos of Larios and Pac-man, it would seem there is no size difference at all. Actually Larios looks bigger! I agree with spreadking and lean toward the over. Maybe Larios by decision. As GW stated, venue is a serious concern. How about a nice juicy draw play?
 

Spreadking

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 16, 2005
298
0
0
nice weekend Frank

I hit my 2 plays with the over on pac/larios and under on the cazares fight. wish I would have put more on them lol :)
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,573
226
63
"the bunker"
not really good form though,bud.....playing under 6.5....and cashing in the first round?...

a tad ostentatious,i`d say....


cool it.... :nono:
 

frank s.

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 11, 2004
1,874
5
0
GW; you are out of control. You are using 10$ words like they grow on trees. Perhaps a tad pretentious, would you say?
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top