Bulls/Pacers Total

[JT Sneaks]

I have seen sevral of you on the UNDER in this game, and i was just curious on some of the reasoning if you have time to post it would be nice, because as of now I am leaning to the over...

Thanks in advance,

JT

Sneaks

 

[jyapur]

The under is 12-5 in CHI's games this season.
The under is 7-3 in CHI's road games this year.
The under is 4-1 in their last five meetings.

I hope its valuable}
Jyapur

 

[xerri]

I like the over myself. Pacers last 10 at home have given up 107, 104, 95, 96, 91, 120, 102, 103, 97, and 96. Those last 4 the last couple of weeks were Atlanta, Washington, San Antonio, and Denver. Only good team there is SA. Bulls last 10 on the road have given up 96, 127, 101, 106, 105, 93, 96, 78, 100, and 102. The 78 is to the Knicks so I don't count that as a great defensive performance. I see the Pacers scoring at least 100. Unless somebody really decides to step up their defense in this game it should go over.

 

[pizmo]

*The UNDER is 3-1 in DEN's last four games overall.
*The UNDER is 6-1 in the last seven meetings.
*The UNDER is 8-2 in TOR's last 10 games overall.
*Denver O/U = 7-9
*Toronto O/U = 7-12

GL JT, lookin forward for your plays

 

[nighthorse]

here are the point totals for CHI in last road games (most recent listed first along with o/u result): 176u, 168u, 149u, 188u, 181u, 176u, 208o, 194o, 191o, 178u. That's what looks like a classic "trend"

It's true they give up a lot, but they don't score themselves. Generally, it takes two teams to get an over (the exception was Minne 127, chi 74).

They are truly hideous on the road when it comes to putting the ball in the hole. If they score 85 tonight, it probably goes over. I think the chances of that are less than 50% (With the line moving, it is getting better, but it still looks like a :eek

. GLTA

 

[JT Sneaks]

Thanks for all the information, but I think I am going to pass, although I think the Over may still have some merit but I think I would have to rely on the bulls to score at least 85-90, and I don't think I am willing to lay money on that....

Sneaks