well it looks like the "public"(whoever the fuk that is) got paid on these 2 games....:mj07:
wonder if huggins has anymore predictions
wonder if huggins has anymore predictions
butler and kansas and the"public"
- Thread starter LET'S EAT!!!
- Start date
:mj07: hey man i had kansas and it was pretty close air, sweated that chit out but glad they covered
No way K State was going to cover? Dude, Kansas missed a free throw up 7 with 4 Kansas State guys in the lane to get the rebound and the KU shooter got the ball and put it back in. Without that rebound...Kansas State would have had time to go down and either shoot a three or get a layup and cover. Not saying they would have but it was certainly not a lock. Also, the bullshit calls on Kansas State and the Technical on Huggins completely swung the game. On the blown call when the KSU guy got hammered but no call the score was 52-47. So if KSU makes both FT's on what should have been a foul the game is 52-49 at best or 52-48 if he makes 1-2. But there is a no call and it's 52-47 and Kansas makes a three to go up 55-47...their biggest lead of the game. It was certainly not a slam dunk for Kansas getting the cover.
thats what joe the pipe fitter does down the street from ya......"kansas - kansas state...ehh kansas runs away with it, slam dunk, easy money, no way they can keep up, wins by 40".....get a clue, ksu opened the 2nd half 1 for 12 shooting and the cover was STILL in doubt until the last 18 secs.......
Agreed Dice. The public had a helluva night tonight but as always...it won't last. Never does. Just keep toughing it out night after night and we will win. Had a tough stretch lately...just have to keep working. GL.
yea really, everyone keeps saying public, what are you guys? the betting elite?
all i hear is if kstate this, if kstate that, of course you can say if this and that....if the dog didnt stop to shit he woulda caught the rabbit. now its my turn to if, if kansas played their game and didnt come out flat they would have won by 20. it being that close was a fluke
LOL. Kansas shot 51% for the game and barely got the cover. It was a 6 point game with less than 10 seconds left. I love how people act like Kansas just covered so easily. Keep betting that way and you will lose in the long run. Congrats on that one but laying road chalk is not a winner long-term.
well it looks like the "public"(whoever the fuk that is) got paid on these 2 games....:mj07:
wonder if huggins has anymore predictions
Lets eat, surprised to see you with such a stupid post. i didn't bet either one of these games. I played the KU Kstate under. But for you to come in here, and act like a know it all is funny. You have obviously been here awhile, noting your amount of posts. Last night you were claiming there were no good sides today, and that you weren't planning on betting. Now you had 2 picks go your way, and your acting like a ****ing know it all on 2 games that were close throughout. Did you even watch either game, or bet on either. I'll leave it at this: one of the best cappers that used to post here a lot more was on Wis-GB. I've got to imagine that its jack offs like you that make him and others go to other sites where they don't have to listen to your juvenile bullshit. Nice job. I look forward to more of your 20-20 hindsight in the future.
rouxdog-for starters plz dont come in my threads talking any of ur shit!!....i didnt come in here act like a know it all either....what i said was stating the obvious that there was heavy $ that came in on both of these favs by the so called "public" and they both hit....thats it!! so how is that a know it all? i didnt play either fukin game either and yes i did say there was no good lookin plays on the card last night so i made only 1 fukin play if u need to know and that was the over 153 in davidson/wofford that i barely hit by a bucket....furthermore smart ass where did i ever say that i had played these games for u to come in my thread and say"now you had 2 picks go your way and your acting like a fukin know it all"??tell me when and where i ever said i played these....ur a fukin knucklehead who obviously(by ur posts in other threads that ive read regarding this ku/kstate game)has a red ass about kstate losing a game to ku that i could give 2 shits about....and to refer to me as a "jack off"....who the fuk do u think u are u bitch made muthafuker?? ur right i have been around awhile and to also refer to "my juvenile bullshit" fuk u punk!!!.....u dont think its juvenile for u to come in someones thread and post this kind of shit like u have in mine?? hiding behind a fukin computer monitor....READ MY FUKIN POST AGAIN ASSHOLE!!! I SAID IT LOOKS LIKE THE "PUBLIC" GOT PAID ON THESE 2 GAMES REFERRING TO BUTLER AND KANSAS.....THATS IT....THE END.....THATS ALL I SAID AND U SPEW ALL OF THIS CRAP??....AGAIN FUK OFF AND STAY OUT OF MY THREADS IF U WANNA COME IN AND START SHIT......i never once said anything about how easy either one of these games covered and i really dont give a shit if they were easy covers or hard covers cuz i didnt play them.....i think its shitheads like u that come in and start shit in peoples threads that run people off :gf:
p.s. good luck with ur royals this year!!!:142smilie
um kansas had 16 turnovers, and rush was in foul trouble early. julian wright also didnt play well, so if you are going to if this and if that for kstate, the same goes for kansas. and like i said, they didnt play their style of ball the whole game and could have easily won this by a lot more.
i dont understand why you guys like to argue so much, bashing people that had kansas and trying to make it seem like kansas state is still a good play even though they lost by 9. people here just want to look like big shots, taking a non public play like kstate and amping it up to be the right play, even though it lost. if kstate would have covered, those people would have been here saying "easy win", but instead theyre here trying to bash how kansas was a public play and "youll lose money in the long run". thanks for the tips but im pretty sure we all know the road favorites dont always cover, but in this case.
:00hour ROCK CHALK JAYHAWK:00hour
lmm- i know we r the public....i was just using sarcasm cuz i always get a kick out of all the guys on here that make references to the "public" or "public money" when they themselves are part of the so called "public"....i think its comical and have been clowning this term on here for years...i've been asking all the guys that use this bullshit term for years on here what do i have to do to join the "private" club:142smilie
you have to pick the home dog no matter what and even if it loses stand firm behind it insisting it was the right play and should have won
hey Let's Eat
hey Let's Eat
i hear ya bro. Royals fan/Huggins nut sucker is an a**hole. i enjoy reading your posts and share many of the same thoughts on tonights chit chat.
hey Let's Eat
i hear ya bro. Royals fan/Huggins nut sucker is an a**hole. i enjoy reading your posts and share many of the same thoughts on tonights chit chat.
- Mar 19, 2006
- 38,176
- 356
- 83
- 74
You mean that "Private Club" that wagers 6 BILLION DOLLARS off-shore from their computer at work and from home?:mj07:
Never quite figured that term out myself..If that is private I hate to think what the $ figure is for a semi private room is:scared
This is not a bash
This is not a bash
I think a lot of us are guilty in these internet message forums of saying "Well the public has this, this consensus site shows the public has this..."
We are all the betting public. Are some of us more 'square' than others? Absolutely, but what makes us square? Betting double digit conference road faves, the over on every nationally televised game? Is it a 'public' side when a team like Kansas is only favored by 5 over a team they blew out by 40 a couple weeks ago?
A lot of these 'public' games hit regularly. We are setting ourselves up for failure if we bet strictly contrarian vs the percieved public or what a consensus site says. These consensus sites are just a small sampling of what numbers are being bet.
A lot of these numbers could be skewed badly by regions etc. Call a bookie tonite in Wisconsin and ask him how much he is holding on the badgers. Call the one in East lansing and the number could be greatly skewed.
I have fallen into this 'public' frame of mind and anti-public, contrarian etc, only to find myself on the losing side more often than not. So I said screw it, capped my own games even harder, ignored numbers, consensus etc, and still lose LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO. But the point I make is don't psyche or talk yourself out of a 'good' bet just because the 'public' is on a game or let vegas or the offshore dictate the line to you.
If none of this made sense, it was because I was talking with one of my 12 sandwiches in my mouth. I think I need a Kabob.
:bigear:
This is not a bash
I think a lot of us are guilty in these internet message forums of saying "Well the public has this, this consensus site shows the public has this..."
We are all the betting public. Are some of us more 'square' than others? Absolutely, but what makes us square? Betting double digit conference road faves, the over on every nationally televised game? Is it a 'public' side when a team like Kansas is only favored by 5 over a team they blew out by 40 a couple weeks ago?
A lot of these 'public' games hit regularly. We are setting ourselves up for failure if we bet strictly contrarian vs the percieved public or what a consensus site says. These consensus sites are just a small sampling of what numbers are being bet.
A lot of these numbers could be skewed badly by regions etc. Call a bookie tonite in Wisconsin and ask him how much he is holding on the badgers. Call the one in East lansing and the number could be greatly skewed.
I have fallen into this 'public' frame of mind and anti-public, contrarian etc, only to find myself on the losing side more often than not. So I said screw it, capped my own games even harder, ignored numbers, consensus etc, and still lose LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO. But the point I make is don't psyche or talk yourself out of a 'good' bet just because the 'public' is on a game or let vegas or the offshore dictate the line to you.
If none of this made sense, it was because I was talking with one of my 12 sandwiches in my mouth. I think I need a Kabob.
:bigear:
