Byron Nelson
- Thread starter WhatsHisNuts
- Start date
Outrights
Outrights
The Nelson means next week is my 28th Colonial
ODDS TO WIN AT&T BYRON NELSON 2016 JORDAN SPIETH +875
ODDS TO WIN AT&T BYRON NELSON 2016 MATT KUCHAR +2270
ODDS TO WIN AT&T BYRON NELSON 2016 ZACH JOHNSON +3065
ODDS TO WIN AT&T BYRON NELSON 2016 CHARL SCHWARTZEL +3160
ODDS TO WIN AT&T BYRON NELSON 2016 COLT KNOST +5250
Outrights
The Nelson means next week is my 28th Colonial
ODDS TO WIN AT&T BYRON NELSON 2016 JORDAN SPIETH +875
ODDS TO WIN AT&T BYRON NELSON 2016 MATT KUCHAR +2270
ODDS TO WIN AT&T BYRON NELSON 2016 ZACH JOHNSON +3065
ODDS TO WIN AT&T BYRON NELSON 2016 CHARL SCHWARTZEL +3160
ODDS TO WIN AT&T BYRON NELSON 2016 COLT KNOST +5250
Zach Johnson (Tourn) -130
over
Marc Leishman (Tourn)
Alex Cejka (Tourn) -125
over
Aaron Baddeley (Tourn)
over
Marc Leishman (Tourn)
Alex Cejka (Tourn) -125
over
Aaron Baddeley (Tourn)
Outrights:
Louis Oosthuizen(28/1) e.w.
Danny Lee(50/1) e.w.
Bryson Dechambeau(50/1) e.w.
Lucas Glover(80/1) e.w.
Martin Piller(175/1) e.w.
GL
Louis Oosthuizen(28/1) e.w.
Danny Lee(50/1) e.w.
Bryson Dechambeau(50/1) e.w.
Lucas Glover(80/1) e.w.
Martin Piller(175/1) e.w.
GL
Ben Crane 16
Bud Cauley 32
Crane has shown no particular form coming into this event and his ball-striking was far from perfect in rd1, but he was much improved in rd2 and now leads this event - this is a large price for a player with a one-shot lead after 36 holes and who has a 3-for-5 record on the PGA Tour when leading after 36 holes (it is 2-for-2 when he is sole leader after 36 holes)
The market is dominated by Spieth being in 2nd place in his hometown event, but that typically adds more pressure on a player, particularly over the weekend, and that is evident from his finishes here: 16th-32nd-68th-37th-30th; by contrast Cauley is also in 2nd place and these odds look much too large for someone in that position and back to full health
Bud Cauley 32
Crane has shown no particular form coming into this event and his ball-striking was far from perfect in rd1, but he was much improved in rd2 and now leads this event - this is a large price for a player with a one-shot lead after 36 holes and who has a 3-for-5 record on the PGA Tour when leading after 36 holes (it is 2-for-2 when he is sole leader after 36 holes)
The market is dominated by Spieth being in 2nd place in his hometown event, but that typically adds more pressure on a player, particularly over the weekend, and that is evident from his finishes here: 16th-32nd-68th-37th-30th; by contrast Cauley is also in 2nd place and these odds look much too large for someone in that position and back to full health
Round 3 Match Ups
Round 3 Match Ups
C SCHWARTZEL (RND 3) -125 (G WOODLAND (RND 3) vrs C SCHWARTZEL (RND 3))
C KNOST (RND 3) +105 (C KNOST (RND 3) vrs C HOFFMAN (RND 3))
B MOLDER (RND 3) -125 (B MOLDER (RND 3) vrs P RODGERS (RND 3)
Round 3 Match Ups
C SCHWARTZEL (RND 3) -125 (G WOODLAND (RND 3) vrs C SCHWARTZEL (RND 3))
C KNOST (RND 3) +105 (C KNOST (RND 3) vrs C HOFFMAN (RND 3))
B MOLDER (RND 3) -125 (B MOLDER (RND 3) vrs P RODGERS (RND 3)
4th Round Matchups
Danny Lee beat D. Johnson +120
S. Marino beat B. Crane +100
B. Cauley beat T. Wilkinson +100
K. Reifers beat G. Woodland +120
B. Koepka beat J. Spieth +140
C. Campbell beat S. O'Hair +100
C. Reavie beat C. Knost +115
F. Jacobson beat J. Dufner +115
J. Senden beat J. Blixt -105
R. Garrigus beat S. Levin -105
Danny Lee beat D. Johnson +120
S. Marino beat B. Crane +100
B. Cauley beat T. Wilkinson +100
K. Reifers beat G. Woodland +120
B. Koepka beat J. Spieth +140
C. Campbell beat S. O'Hair +100
C. Reavie beat C. Knost +115
F. Jacobson beat J. Dufner +115
J. Senden beat J. Blixt -105
R. Garrigus beat S. Levin -105
Round 4 Match Ups
Round 4 Match Ups
D LEE (RND 4) +120 (D LEE (RND 4) vrs D JOHNSON (RND 4)
M KUCHAR (RND 4) -115 (M KUCHAR (RND 4) vrs S GARCIA (RND 4))
Round 4 Match Ups
D LEE (RND 4) +120 (D LEE (RND 4) vrs D JOHNSON (RND 4)
M KUCHAR (RND 4) -115 (M KUCHAR (RND 4) vrs S GARCIA (RND 4))
for rd 4, playing:
reifers +120 vs woodland
for some reason that i'm not quite sure of i like kyle's chances of following up 65's in succession better than i fancy woodland's chances of following up two straight 64's
as always, gl
la burns
reifers +120 vs woodland
for some reason that i'm not quite sure of i like kyle's chances of following up 65's in succession better than i fancy woodland's chances of following up two straight 64's
as always, gl
la burns
awful push - woodland drained a few long putts and the Reifers blowup on 12 was painful - oh well, onward and upward
