Cal/Nevada dumfounded

DavidD

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 10, 1999
13
0
0
This is the one of the strangest lines I have seen in any sport in the 19 years i've been sports gambling.

Chris Ault is 0-7 SU and 0-7 ATS against BCS schools over his last 5 years in the reg. season(they did cover in a bowl in '06 vs miami).

The last 2 seasons they had pretty much the same setup as this game, a pretty good BCS school coming in to play them on their home field early in the season.

Two seasons ago, Texas Tech and Mike Leach came in and stomped them as 35-19.

Last season(in this very setup), Mizzou came in on a Friday Night ESPN game and handily beat them 31-21 with Nevada getting a late TD to make it look close(however they did take an early second half lead). On top of that, Mizzou's QB was making his first true road start of career. I was at this game and Mizzou had 40% of the croud, so homefield advantage is not as big there as other schools, since Reno is a trip visiting teams alums are willing to make for obvious reasons.

Cal has a senior QB. It is a pretty short road trip. Should be plenty of Cal fans there.

So what am I missing here? Why should i believe that Nevada can rise to the occasion when they and there coach have failed in this spot many times? I actually saw this line at Cal -2.5 yesterday at a book.

This has had me scratching my head all week.


DavidD
 

Blackgoose

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 10, 2010
299
2
0
I am playing Cal tonight. I have tried to scout and find ways Nevada keeps this close. Still looking. Took Cal -2.5.
 

DavidD

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 10, 1999
13
0
0
I am playing Cal tonight. I have tried to scout and find ways Nevada keeps this close. Still looking. Took Cal -2.5.

I just don't understand the line. Tech was favored by 10 and Mizzou by 8.5 why is Cal just favored by 3 in pretty much the same spot Mizzou was in last season? Maybe Nevada is better? But I can't believe Cal isn't better than the team Mizzou fielded last season. Shorter trip, more exp. QB ect.....ect.....Both games on Prime Time Friday ESPN. Plus against a coach who has failed and failed and failed to keep games against BCS opponents close.

I am just trying to find any reasoning why the line came out so low and is staying there. Just looks fishy.

DavidD
 

Blackgoose

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 10, 2010
299
2
0
Colin Kaepernick is going to be the player for Nevada tonight. If Cal can make him throw the ball I see them winning by 2+TD. Either way they are not going to crush Cal. Look to middle at half if they look evenly matched.
 

Tiny

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 18, 2009
1,181
1
0
this is a very low line for the bears....be careful.
 

LDB

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 18, 2007
18,719
55
48
38
Bay Area, CA
I dont think this line is off by much at all..

Cal is on the road, playing against a very good Nevada Offense (not much defense to speak of)

There is no trap line, no fishy line, this line is about right where it is supposed to be..

gl with your play
 

CartersCubs

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 2, 2008
1,586
4
0
Indiana
this is what i'm seeing:

Cal -3 (even)
Nevada +3 (-120)

Bet spread:
Cal 77%
Nevada 23%

someone please explain!
 

LetsMakeMoney

~Gambla~
Forum Member
Mar 6, 2005
19,452
92
0
46
Sin City
nevada is toast take cal and fogetabout it :0074 People taking nevada obviously havent seen cal play this yr,it's ok they'll learn how good they are real fast :0corn
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top