Can we quarantine them ?

[DOGS THAT BARK]

What is it about Da Base that makes them want to destroy others property--piss on rest rooms floors -rape -burn and pillage--

The perfect soultion-
-let them occupy themselves :SIB



<! TOP LEFT STARTS HERE><TT>

Dead man in Salt Lake City...
Tuberculosis in Atlanta...
'Zuccotti Lung' on Wall Street...
Suicide in Vermont...
Murder in Oakland... <!-- Main headlines links BEGIN -->
<CENTER>
</CENTER><CENTER>
<! MAIN HEADLINE>[FONT=ARIAL,VERDANA,HELVETICA][SIZE=+7]

DEATH, DISEASE PLAGUE 'OCCUPY' PROTESTS[/SIZE][/FONT]</CENTER></TT>

 

[Skulnik]

:0074

 

[THE KOD]

It will do major damage. Here's why.



Rick Perry says he had a 'brain fart'

Gov. Brewer stumbles at debate First, I've been evaluating debates for 20 years, and can tell you -- if you doubted it for a second -- that Perry's mental block was very, very bad. One reason is that the question he was asked at the time wasn't even about cutting agencies. It was about how he could work with Democrats across the aisle. But Perry wanted to add some flair, so he looked at Ron Paul in order to brag about how he would cut three different agencies (although still not as many as Paul's five) and then gave himself the self-induced wound.

What then made it worse was that Perry was asked twice if he could remember the third agency and he continued to draw a blank. Whatever credibility he had disappeared like his memory. It was a perfect example of a gotcha question, which everyone from Newt Gingrich to Sarah Palin complains about -- except that nobody even asked it. Perry did the gotcha on himself.

The more damning reason his mistake will hurt in the long run is because it gives the audience a consistent (and unfavorable) impression of Perry. One of the things I tell my communications classes is that people cling to first impressions. It's why first impressions are so difficult to overcome, especially if they are negative.

Unfortunately, if you have been watching these Republican presidential debates, your first impression, along with that of many other viewers, is that Rick Perry does not have the best grasp of the issues and he has a difficult time answering questions. Fair or not, this may turn people away from voting for him.

Lately the entire focus of Perry's team has been trying to change the public's first impression of their candidate. They believed these upcoming debates would help. After all, Perry couldn't get any worse, right? Oops. It turns out he could. And since many in the public have an unfavorable first impression, Perry's performance fed right into that.

Because of his poor first impression, Perry was the candidate who could least afford a slip-up of this magnitude. Instead of overcoming that negative first impression, he did the opposite. He cemented it. As in cement shoes. And Perry is anchored to them as he is falling into a deep Texas waterhole.

Up to now, Perry's cumulative debating performance has been pretty weak. I cringe every time I watch Perry give any answer, since my expectations are that he might forget what he is talking about or begin an undisciplined, meandering ramble and end up mumbling some nonsense under his breath. While he may never give another poor answer in a debate, I still expect it. And therein lies the problem. It has now become a lasting impression.

Some blunders cannot be overcome. While Jan Brewer won her election, she was debating against a Democrat when her poor debating performance occurred. Republicans had no other choice but to vote for her or the Democrat. That's not the case with Perry. There are other Republicans that voters will now begin to gravitate toward.

 

[THE KOD]

Opps .....

and Double Oops

 

[Skulnik]

It will do major damage. Here's why.



Rick Perry says he had a 'brain fart'

Gov. Brewer stumbles at debate First, I've been evaluating debates for 20 years, and can tell you -- if you doubted it for a second -- that Perry's mental block was very, very bad. One reason is that the question he was asked at the time wasn't even about cutting agencies. It was about how he could work with Democrats across the aisle. But Perry wanted to add some flair, so he looked at Ron Paul in order to brag about how he would cut three different agencies (although still not as many as Paul's five) and then gave himself the self-induced wound.

What then made it worse was that Perry was asked twice if he could remember the third agency and he continued to draw a blank. Whatever credibility he had disappeared like his memory. It was a perfect example of a gotcha question, which everyone from Newt Gingrich to Sarah Palin complains about -- except that nobody even asked it. Perry did the gotcha on himself.

The more damning reason his mistake will hurt in the long run is because it gives the audience a consistent (and unfavorable) impression of Perry. One of the things I tell my communications classes is that people cling to first impressions. It's why first impressions are so difficult to overcome, especially if they are negative.

Unfortunately, if you have been watching these Republican presidential debates, your first impression, along with that of many other viewers, is that Rick Perry does not have the best grasp of the issues and he has a difficult time answering questions. Fair or not, this may turn people away from voting for him.

Lately the entire focus of Perry's team has been trying to change the public's first impression of their candidate. They believed these upcoming debates would help. After all, Perry couldn't get any worse, right? Oops. It turns out he could. And since many in the public have an unfavorable first impression, Perry's performance fed right into that.

Because of his poor first impression, Perry was the candidate who could least afford a slip-up of this magnitude. Instead of overcoming that negative first impression, he did the opposite. He cemented it. As in cement shoes. And Perry is anchored to them as he is falling into a deep Texas waterhole.

Up to now, Perry's cumulative debating performance has been pretty weak. I cringe every time I watch Perry give any answer, since my expectations are that he might forget what he is talking about or begin an undisciplined, meandering ramble and end up mumbling some nonsense under his breath. While he may never give another poor answer in a debate, I still expect it. And therein lies the problem. It has now become a lasting impression.

Some blunders cannot be overcome. While Jan Brewer won her election, she was debating against a Democrat when her poor debating performance occurred. Republicans had no other choice but to vote for her or the Democrat. That's not the case with Perry. There are other Republicans that voters will now begin to gravitate toward.

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/cxxxGUeZtno" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

 

[Skulnik]

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/EpGH02DtIws" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

 

[DOGS THAT BARK]

Dead man in Salt Lake City...
Tuberculosis in Atlanta...
'Zuccotti Lung' on Wall Street...
Suicide in Vermont...
Murder in Oakland...<!-- Main headlines links BEGIN -->


Consider for a moment if this liberal element really was 99% of population -like they claim--:scared

Imagine if 9 out of 10 people you met today--were unemployed protestors wanting another hand out--ranting in your ear how it's someone else's fault --

Interesting thread in general forum-
http://www.madjacksports.com/forum/showthread.php?t=461632

--pretty much sums up end results of Da Bases's liberal utopias.

ZAAAAAP

 

[THE KOD]

Michael Moores new vacation house.


He should just join the GOP

they are used to taking money from the middle class and poor so they can live like this.

Only thing is fat fawk mm cant fit through the front door.

I will stand up for you and take your arguments and get things changed for the better.... yeh right OK

pity really

 

[THE KOD]

 

[StevieD]

What is it about the Corporate Pigs who feel they are entitled to everything? Why is more never enough for these pigs?

 

[THE KOD]

What is it about the Corporate Pigs who feel they are entitled to everything? Why is more never enough for these pigs?

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

I dont think I would mind it so much if I was eating at the trough.

 

[THE KOD]

If the Greedy Old People want Newt, they're welcome to him.

Here's the truth: Newt is a stinker. He was a stinker, is a stinker and will be a stinker tomorrow. In addition to being a womanizing louse, well he's just a louse in general and in specific.

You name the subject. What would make Newt a bad President? Everything that makes Newt a substandard human being. Go ahead GOP, we dare you.
10 minutes ago | Like (1) | Report abuse
.....................................................................


This was posted on a politics blog.

Newt feels superior and has most of his life.

He really went down the wrong roads in Ga politics.

Its hard to believe that Newt would have the slightest chance as President.

We are in big trouble if he does.

 

[THE KOD]

So you would throw the "family values" mantra out the window for gingrich? Or are you just ingnorant on his history? You know, as a disgraced former speaker that was forced to resign because of ethics violations. He's nothing but a con man - a carival barker using this "campaign" as a way to scam more money from the rubes still gullible enough to buy his books and videos. Gingrich is a disgrace, but the gop knows no shame, and allows for his comeback. If it wasn't so pathetic, it'd be funny. less
.,......................................................................


another blog item about newtsty

dude served his wife divorce papers while she was in the hospital with cancer.
yeh sign him up.

 

[THE KOD]

If you are going to televise a debate, then televise the whole thing. Last night's was the first debate on foreign policy, a topic that requires more than the pitiful 90 minutes allocated. But we didn't even get the Full Monty. CBS only televised the first 60 minutes of the 90-minute debate. I have never heard of a debate getting thrown off air before it was finished. Yet that is exactly what CBS did -- and it was the first debate this election cycle on free television. The message: "Go watch the conclusion on the Internet. We have more 'NCIS' to air."

I know, I know, we all want nothing more than to return to our regularly scheduled television programming. We hate it when it gets interrupted. And Mark Harmon is dreamy. I get it. But the hypocrisy was too much for me. Remember, this was a debate that CBS itself proudly (to get more viewers) titled the "commander in chief" debate.

Seriously, if CBS were running the country, all our enemies (there was a bushel basket of them noted by the candidates in the first 60 minutes of this debate alone) would have to do is wait until everyone was watching "NCIS" to attack. After all, apparently the commander in chief position isn't nearly as important.

:142smilie :facepalm: :SIB