Candace Owens 🤦🏽

[Cie]

So, I?m not pushing covid vaccines on people, and feel it is an individual choice like abortion, practicing safe sex, etc. But, I struggle to put up with folks saying covid vaccine is implanting tracking devices, bill gates is trying to control the world, vaccines are laced with anti-fertility drugs to lower birth rates, etc. Candace Owens is irresponsible and I highly doubt she believes this nonsense she is peddling regarding the covid vaccine.


https://twitter.com/realcandaceo/status/1416572777386106883?s=21

 

[WhatsHisNuts]

Co-opt something rooted in truth and twist it to fit your fucked up agenda. This is step one in the conspiracy pusher playbook.

 

[PocketAces]

Thank you for posting that. I took a look at a bunch of her other posts. Most if them were very interesting.

She posted a report that 60% of COVID hospitalizations in England are fully vaccinated people.

I just don?t know what to believe anymore. As soon as I think I understand it then a new report comes out completely contradicting the one before.

Why would the majority of hospitalizations be vaccinated people?

 

[WhatsHisNuts]

Thank you for posting that. I took a look at a bunch of her other posts. Most if them were very interesting.

She posted a report that 60% of COVID hospitalizations in England are fully vaccinated people.

I just don?t know what to believe anymore. As soon as I think I understand it then a new report comes out completely contradicting the one before.

Why would the majority of hospitalizations be vaccinated people?

Where are you getting your information? You should start checking the validity of your sources with one of the media bias checkers so you can start weeding out the trash. Reuters and APNEWS.com are rated very highly in least amount of bias and factual reporting.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/ you can search sources here to see there rating. A lot of the "news outlets" are anything but.

PS: Candace Owens is not posting "very interesting" things, she's posting BS that panders to far right conspiracy theory consumers. There's no way in hell that the majority of hospitalizations are vaccinated people. There's an anti-vax agenda out there and they aren't letting facts get in the way.

 

[yyz]

Why would ultra conservative Candace Owens forget to mention that the Koch Foundation has money tied up in this "nefarious scheme"?

 

[PocketAces]

Where are you getting your information? You should start checking the validity of your sources with one of the media bias checkers so you can start weeding out the trash. Reuters and APNEWS.com are rated very highly in least amount of bias and factual reporting.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/ you can search sources here to see there rating. A lot of the "news outlets" are anything but.

PS: Candace Owens is not posting "very interesting" things, she's posting BS that panders to far right conspiracy theory consumers. There's no way in hell that the majority of hospitalizations are vaccinated people. There's an anti-vax agenda out there and they aren't letting facts get in the way.

I got the information from the link you posted. I scrolled down to see what else she had to say.

The study from England is only a few post below the one you pointed out. Take a look.

:shrug:

 

[WhatsHisNuts]

Cie posted it, but I found what you referred to. Right above it is this tweet

[FONT=&quot]<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">His press conference goes viral and just like that? he comes out and says he made a mistake. <br>He even specifically explained why the 60% was so high, but? it was a mistake people. <a href="https://t.co/uvKRwJyM7e">https://t.co/uvKRwJyM7e</a></p>— Candace Owens (@RealCandaceO) <a href="https://twitter.com/RealCandaceO/status/1417239890811555841?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 19, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>[/FONT]​

 

[WhatsHisNuts]

So, here's what I was talking about. She works for the Daily Wire. I looked it up and here's how it's rated.....


<header class="entry-header" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">[h=1]The Daily Wire[/h]</header><header class="entry-header" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">[h=2]

[/h]

---

[h=2]QUESTIONABLE SOURCE[/h]A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
<center style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;"><amp-ad width="100vw" height="320" type="adsense" data-ad-client="ca-pub-6505602311060910" data-ad-slot="2554123025" data-auto-format="rspv" data-full-width="">
</amp-ad></center>

</header>

• Overall, we rate The Daily Wire Right Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that align with the conservative right. We also rate Questionable due to the promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, and numerous failed fact checks.

---

[h=3]Detailed Report[/h]Questionable Reasoning: Conspiracy Theories, Propaganda, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA (45/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
<center style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">

</center>

 

[T]

She's on the far right and the exact opposite of AOC. The difference is I would fuck Candace while I would run from AOC.

 

[Cie]

She's on the far right and the exact opposite of AOC. The difference is I would fuck Candace while I would run from AOC.

Similar people. Both annoyingly arrogant. Both super rigid with no bend. Both use fear to manipulate the weak while on opposite ends of race issues, covid, environment, economy , etc. And, yes, AOC is creepy looking