Catching 3.5
- Thread starter BleedDodgerBlue
- Start date
Im shockes I had stanford ml...those are the types of endings i have ucla !!+3.5
sorry man, horrible... when i saw the defender coming from behind i felt there was a chance that was gonna happen .. the bigger upset was it didnt effect me ...happens 3-4 times a year and i seen to be on the wrong side every time ...shake it off buddy
I can handle losing. No problem. It was just gross. It was almost like the fix is in shit even though it wasn't.
UCLA covered 59:57 of the game. The only way to lose is a sack, a recovery, and a 60 yard fumble return. An interception the dude just falls down.
That was big time fucking ugly.
UCLA covered 59:57 of the game. The only way to lose is a sack, a recovery, and a 60 yard fumble return. An interception the dude just falls down.
That was big time fucking ugly.
- Apr 25, 2014
- 263
- 3
- 18
I'm sick with you. Had ucla +9.5 for $990 which is one of my biggest wagers this year. Think it is the worst bad beat I've had.
I had Stanford(-2') and I almost lost my dinner when that last extra point just squeezed through the upright. After that, my sincere condolences to any bettor that had to endure the wrong side of that fluke finish.
But I gotta say that failure to call targeting earlier in the game was the most corrupt piece of officiating I've seen all year. I'm very glad Stanford got the win they deserved.
GL
But I gotta say that failure to call targeting earlier in the game was the most corrupt piece of officiating I've seen all year. I'm very glad Stanford got the win they deserved.
GL
