<header class="entry-header" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-variant-numeric: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-size: 16px; line-height: inherit; font-family: Roboto; vertical-align: baseline; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">[h=1]100 Percent Fed Up[/h]</header>
<header class="entry-header" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">[h=2]
[/h]
[h=2]QUESTIONABLE SOURCE[/h]A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
<center style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;"><amp-ad width="100vw" height="320" type="adsense" data-ad-client="ca-pub-6505602311060910" data-ad-slot="2554123025" data-auto-format="rspv" data-full-width="">
</amp-ad></center>
- Overall, we rate 100 Percent Fed Up Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias through story selection, use of poor sources, promotion of propaganda through loaded emotional wording, several failed fact checks by IFCN fact-checkers, and a complete lack of transparency.
</header>[h=3]Detailed Report[/h]Questionable Reasoning: Propaganda, Poor Sourcing, Failed Fact Checks, Lack of Transparency
Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
