Danger of Parlays?

PacMan

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 28, 2000
246
0
0
Minneapolis
I posted this last year as well, but wanted to post it again for those who weren't here.

Year after year, I keep hearing about the "dangers of parlays", and how bad of a bet they are. For a majority of bettors, that is true. However, it is not true for a select few. Here are the numbers that I came up with. I use a $1 bet for simplicity - obviously most (all?) of you would be risking significantly more.

Straight Bets
-110 Odds

Odds at 40% accuracy = 2 in 5 (40%)
5 bets breakdown: 2 wins (+1.818) 3 losses (-3)
Money breakdown: $5 bet, -$1.182 total
Profit Margin at 40% accuracy = -23.64%

Odds at 50% accuracy = 1 in 2 (50%)
2 bets breakdown: 1 win (+.909) 1 lose (-1)
Money breakdown: $2 bet, -$0.091 total
Profit Margin at 50% accuracy = -4.55%

Odds at 55% accuracy = 11 in 20 (55%)
20 bets breakdown: 11 wins (+10) 9 losses (-9)
Money breakdown: $20 bet, $1 total
Profit Margin at 55% accuracy = 5%

Odds at 60% accuracy = 3 in 5 (60%)
5 bets breakdown: 3 wins (2.727) 2 losses (-2)
Money breakdown: $5 bet, $0.727 total
Profit Margin at 60% accuracy = 14.54%


Parlays
3 team pays 6-1

Odds at 40% accuracy = 8 in 125 (6.4%)
125 bets breakdown: 8 wins (+48) 117 losses (-117)
Money breakdown: $125 bet, -$69 total
Profit Margin at 40% accuracy = -55.2%

Odds at 50% accuracy = 1 in 8 (12.5%)
8 bets breakdown: 1 win (+6), 7 losses (-7)
Money breakdown: $8 bet, -$1 total
Profit Margin at 50% accuracy = -12.5%

Odds at 55% accuracy = 1331 in 8000 (16.64%)
8000 bets breakdown: 1331 wins (+7986), 6669 losses (-6669)
Money breakdown: $8000 bet, +$1317 total
Profit Margin at 55% accuracy = 16.46%

Odds at 60% accuracy = 27 in 125 (21.6%)
125 bets breakdown: 27 wins (+162), 98 loses (-98)
Money breakdown: $125 bet, +$64 total
Profit Margin at 60% accuracy = 51.2%

Let's try to make that pretty:

Straight Bets Parlays
40% -23.64% -55.2%
50% -4.55% -12.5%
55% +5% +16.46%
60% +14.54% +51.2%


So, as you can see, if you are a losing bettor, you will lose more money by parlaying. However, if you are a winning bettor, you will win more money by betting 3 team parlays. Of course, all three picks have to be solid picks - you can't take two picks and randomly choose the third.

Granted, you could hit 60% of your picks and lose in the short term this way. You could also hit 40% of your picks and win. However, over the long run, doing three team parlays at 6-1 odds should improve your winnings if you are a winning bettor.

Standard disclaimer - if you lose all of your money on three team parlays, don't come crying to me. You either aren't winning a high enough percent of picks, or else aren't managing your money well. You have a much better chance of losing 15 3-team parlays in a row than standard bets. Use your head.

I realize I may be doing some people a disservice by posting this. I don't want to see anyone lose more money than they would have because of something that I said (typed). However, I feel it is important that people understand the math behind parlays.

My two cents.
 
W

wondo

Guest
I like the writeup.

Don't get me wrong. I appreciate what you are saying.

But also, look at the math behind a winning percentage of 55% if you bet a flat 2.5% of your bankroll everyplay. It works out real well on paper. It makes you a fortune within a decade.

But even if you do hit 55% every year for ten years, it doesn't happen evenly. I think that while it's important to have a mathematical basis for one's theories, it is also important to realize that there are most definitely ups and downs, strong points and low points, within a single season and from season to season.

And not necessarily due to a 'chaos theory' or random mathematical analysis, but because one person's method of handicapping either coincides with, or conflicts with, the general method of determining a line at a certain time period. Maybe that's just me, but over the past 5 or 6 years I can see what time of the year has been my strongest and what has been my weakest and it is very similar year in and year out.

So I think some people, or perhaps at some time, one needs to toss some of the theoretical math out of the equation and pay close attention to one's own progress, or lack thereof.

Not ripping your post, as it is factual and helpful to some. But I for one, don't think the numbers work to my benefit in the real world because of my documented ups and downs.
 

JimO

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 22, 2001
101
0
0
Nevada
Bravo

Bravo

I've done a lot of number crunching and came to the same conclusion. 3 team parlays are an excellent bet..

Sports books will charge a little less juice on a 3 team parlay than on a straight bet. This gives the bet a nice even +600 return when in fact the bet should only pay +595.

fyi. Infinity Sports International pays 7-1 odds on 3 team parlays. That's NO JUICE whatsoever!!

4 team parlays are not so good and 5 teams and up are bad bets.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top