DOES ANYONE REMEMBER THE SYSTEM THAT INVOLVES 0 AND 5 TEAMS COMING OFF A BYE?

[REDSKIN]

I remember this system pretty well because my team fell into the wrong side of it not that long ago. I went to see my Skins play a home game a couple of seasons ago against the Rams. The Rams were 0-5 and coming off of a bye. I remember seeing this system that said 0-5 teams off of a bye covered the spread more than 83% and got the su win more than 55% of the time. To make a long story short, 3 and a half hours later I was wondering how the hell the Redskins could have lost to that sorry ass team. Guess I should have seen it coming! If anyone remembers seeing this or has any info on it, I'd like to see the numbers on it as 2 teams fall into this today. The Bills and Panthers both qualify into this today so thinking about maybe taking a shot. Appreciate any info you guys might have on this. Thanks and good luck!

 

[Truckin']

found this on another site hope it helps!!!! :0074

i reminded you of this angle last season and i'm reminding you again this season...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



as bad as they look, the winless teams after week 5 do win, and do cover the spread after their bye week. and trust me, the 0-5 bills and the 0-5 panthers do not look any worst than 0-8 bucs or the 0-6 titans last season.

2009:
0-7 TB getting 9.5 pts vs Green Bay and winning outright
0-6 Titans laying 3 against Jaguars and winning by 17

2008:
0-12 Detroit getting 10 vs Vikings and losing 16-20 after winning thru 3 qtrs.
0-4 Rams getting 13.5 at Washington and winning straight up.

...and so on...in all, these teams are 23-2 ATS since week 10 of the 1991 season

Buffalo is playing Baltimore, a team that played 5 extremely close games so far this season, including an overtime game in New England last week, and a team just that can't wait for their bye week.

Carolina is playing SF, a team that looked awfull for 3 quarters at home against Oakland last week and a team now playing in Eastern time zone where they won only 4 of last 21 games that started at 1 PM (3 of those 4 wins came against St.Louis).

As bad as they look on paper, Buffalo +13 and Carolina +3 look good enough to me to be the first two plays on this week's menu.

 

[REDSKIN]

found this on another site hope it helps!!!! :0074

i reminded you of this angle last season and i'm reminding you again this season...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



as bad as they look, the winless teams after week 5 do win, and do cover the spread after their bye week. and trust me, the 0-5 bills and the 0-5 panthers do not look any worst than 0-8 bucs or the 0-6 titans last season.

2009:
0-7 TB getting 9.5 pts vs Green Bay and winning outright
0-6 Titans laying 3 against Jaguars and winning by 17

2008:
0-12 Detroit getting 10 vs Vikings and losing 16-20 after winning thru 3 qtrs.
0-4 Rams getting 13.5 at Washington and winning straight up.

...and so on...in all, these teams are 23-2 ATS since week 10 of the 1991 season

Buffalo is playing Baltimore, a team that played 5 extremely close games so far this season, including an overtime game in New England last week, and a team just that can't wait for their bye week.

Carolina is playing SF, a team that looked awfull for 3 quarters at home against Oakland last week and a team now playing in Eastern time zone where they won only 4 of last 21 games that started at 1 PM (3 of those 4 wins came against St.Louis).

As bad as they look on paper, Buffalo +13 and Carolina +3 look good enough to me to be the first two plays on this week's menu.

Thanks T, I knew somebody had a good info on it, I just couldn't remember who. Gonna give Buf and Carolina a shot. San Fran also falls into that westcoast team playing an early eastcoast game negative system as well. Good luck today and thanks for the info.

 

[REDSKIN]

found this on another site hope it helps!!!! :0074

i reminded you of this angle last season and i'm reminding you again this season...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



as bad as they look, the winless teams after week 5 do win, and do cover the spread after their bye week. and trust me, the 0-5 bills and the 0-5 panthers do not look any worst than 0-8 bucs or the 0-6 titans last season.

2009:
0-7 TB getting 9.5 pts vs Green Bay and winning outright
0-6 Titans laying 3 against Jaguars and winning by 17

2008:
0-12 Detroit getting 10 vs Vikings and losing 16-20 after winning thru 3 qtrs.
0-4 Rams getting 13.5 at Washington and winning straight up.

...and so on...in all, these teams are 23-2 ATS since week 10 of the 1991 season

Buffalo is playing Baltimore, a team that played 5 extremely close games so far this season, including an overtime game in New England last week, and a team just that can't wait for their bye week.

Carolina is playing SF, a team that looked awfull for 3 quarters at home against Oakland last week and a team now playing in Eastern time zone where they won only 4 of last 21 games that started at 1 PM (3 of those 4 wins came against St.Louis).

As bad as they look on paper, Buffalo +13 and Carolina +3 look good enough to me to be the first two plays on this week's menu.

Nice call T, this is def a system worth following. Carolina gets the su win as a 3 point dog and now Buff fighting for a su win as a 13 point dog. We'll have to watch for this one next year. Good job and thanks again for the info. :0074