Early Leans Week 7

RipIt3

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 14, 2002
182
0
0
43
Chi-Town
Early Leans Weeks 4-6, since I started capping games differently: 43-21-1, 67.19% (posted). 20-8 last week.

Here are the sides, most are posted, there are a couple of games that didn't get posted due to late lines. The spreadsheet I have doesn't take that into consideration...

Sides: 28-13-1, 66.7%

If I had played dogs for all of the 1* games, this record would be...

32-9-1, 76.2%

Very interesting games this week, it will prove to be a big test for the way I'm looking at games. We'll see what happens.

The *'s are for point spread only, over/under listed next to game. All over/under are 1*...

3*
KC -3.5, O 47

2*
NO -1.5, O 42 W, W
Dal -3, U 39 W, L
Mia -5.5, U 37 L, W
NYJ -3, O 37.5 W, L
TB -3.5, U 39 L, W
Sea -10, U 42.5 L, W

1*
Was +3, U 38.5 L, W
Cin +2, U 36.5 W, L
SD +6, O 41.5 W, W
GB +4, O 49 L, W
Phi +2.5, U 37.5 W, W
Ten +1.5, O 37.5 W, W
Den +3, O 44 L, W


I'll be back later with over/under numbers for Was, Den and Ten.

Good luck this week!
 
Last edited:

SHOWRUNNER

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 17, 2003
360
1
0
Keep up the good work RipIt3! Looks like your new view on capping the games is producing some solid results! Keep it up & GL to you this weekend!

--showrunner
 

RipIt3

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 14, 2002
182
0
0
43
Chi-Town
Thanks Showrunner and good luck to you too!

This week will be a big test I think. In the early looks of things, it's produced 11 road winners. Unbelievable number. We'll see what happens...
 

GM

PleasureGlutton
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2000
2,962
5
0
122
Toronto, ON, Canada
Hey Rip,

Is it just coincidence that all the 2* and 3* plays are favorites, and all the 1* plays are dogs? Seems unusual. :thinking:
 

RipIt3

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 14, 2002
182
0
0
43
Chi-Town
GM -

I've been sitting here trying to figure out why the way I'm capping seems to be working and your question just fell right in line with that, so I figured I'd post on it...

Let me explain to you how I do it, then I'll say what I think it all means. We'll use this weeks KC v. Oak game as an example...

I rate teams offenses vs. their opponent's defense in rushing and passing. For rushing, I use yards per game and passing I use QB Rating.

First rushing...
Rushing Offense:
KC 7
Oak 24

Rushing Defense:
KC 29
Oak 31

I compare them by looking at the difference in rank numbers.
KC's 7th ranked offense is going up against the 31st ranked defense. The difference here is +24.

Oakland's 24th ranked offense is going up against the 29th ranked defense. The difference here is +5.

KC has the edge rushing the ball: +24 to +5.


Now passing...
Passing Offense:
KC 9
Oak 21

Passing Defense:
KC 10
Oak 21

KC: 9 v 21 = +12
Oak: 21 v 10 = -11

KC has the advantage +12 to -11.

I do this for every game, as well as looking at a few other categories.

In this case, KC has the advantage both rushing the ball and passing the ball. In the past three weeks, teams that have the advantage rushing and receiving have gone 21-6-1 against the spread, or 77.8% winners with one push.

For the games that are split rushing and receiving, play on the dogs getting the points. In the last three weeks, the dogs are 11-3, or 78.6%.

Unbelievable. I don't expect those numbers to keep up, but I think they make sense. Here's why...

In a given week you are going to have 3-4 dogs win outright and a few others cover (at least so far this season). When I look at the match-ups, if a team is good enough to have the advantage both rushing and passing, they will generally be the favorite. That is why you see majority favorite picks in the 2* and 3* plays. Usually, one or two games a week will have an underdog that is actually better, by the rankings, than their opponent. Dallas, last week, is an example of this (that line opened up at Dallas +1). I will go a step further and say that a favorite who is better than their opponent both rushing and passing the ball will be more likely to cover in a game than a team that is better in only one of those categories. That makes sense...

Now, in a given week, as I stated before, we are going to have around 6-7 dogs cover (at least so far this season). I state that the majority of dogs to cover will be the dogs who are playing opponents who they match up evenly with - or - are playing against favorites who don't have the advantage both rushing and passing the ball.

So for the teams who have advantages on both ends, those teams are probably going to be favorites and are matched-up in a way that will allow that team to cover. All of the other games are more even, and we know (generally) that the majority of dogs are going to come from this group - because they are matched up in a way that will allow the dog to cover (giving points to one team in a more evenly matched game).

I don't put games that have split Rush/Pass advantages as 2-3 stars because I see them having more of an opportunity to go either way. So all of those games stay at 1*. Looking at the way the games have gone to this point using this, the dogs cover those games the majority of the time. So for those games, I favor the dog, with an inclination to the team who rushes the ball better (ironically, in the vast majority of these games, the dog has the advantage rushing).

Again the numbers don't lie (we hope). For the last three weeks, this is how it's broken down...

Advantage rushing and passing: 21-6-1, 77.8%
Playing dogs whenever rush/pass advantage is split: 11-3, 78.6%
Overall: 32-9-1, 78.1%

All of these games are posted, with the exception of a few - due to early leans released and lines coming out late (ie. minnesota a couple weeks ago). Some of the other totals you've seen me put in here are including plays on over/unders. The numbers above are sides only for every game for the last three weeks.

I know that was long and confusing, I hope I did ok trying to explain it. If you have any questions, fire them at me, I'll try to answer them. I also have spreadsheets from the last three weeks, complete with win/loss records, match-ups, etc. If you want to see one, just email me and I'd be more than happy to send it along.

Good luck this week and I'll see you all in the winner's circle...

GO CUBS!
 

RipIt3

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 14, 2002
182
0
0
43
Chi-Town
Some Updates...

Some Updates...

Here's the record for the posted early leans. Units based on 1*-3* plays for sides and all over/under = 1*.

Weeks 4-6
43-21-1, 67.19%
+44.3 units.

I'll be back later today with a couple more early lean totals...
 

tulah

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 10, 2003
3,470
15
38
So Cal
I"m a huge Redskin fan myself .I grew up in fairfax Co VA
whats your thoughts on Skins @bills ?
considering possible ML on Skins

Total heartbreak for the Cubbies and fans

GL with your pick's :thumb:
 

RipIt3

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 14, 2002
182
0
0
43
Chi-Town
I updated the win/loss of the early leans above...

Sides:
2*
3-3

1*
4-3

Totals:
All 1*
10-3

For the week:
17-9, +6.8 units

For the season:
61-29, +49.1

The 61-29 record breaks down into...

Sides:
35-17, +36.3 units

Totals:
26-12, +12.8 units

3* early lean towards KC still to go. I've played this game at 1*, I think KC runs away with it, but it is Monday Night and it's Oakland and weird things happen. Good luck this week!
 
Last edited:
Bet on MyBookie
Top