energy

selkirk

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 16, 1999
2,147
13
0
Canada
in this thread will post some info on energy companies. if anyone wants to add any info or opinions feel free.

no longer selling any energy stocks, there has been a sharp sell off in many of these stocks. would be more aggressive buyer however unsure on Nat. gas in the short term.

however has shown more strenght of late. will provide info,

currently own cdn. natural resoures, TLM, NXY, Penwest, Encana, and petro canada....loss the most on this stock the others have shown strong gains.


still only own one jr. oil (on Toronto) will own it until year end......

thanks
selkirk
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,436
132
63
Bowling Green Ky
Got a question on natural gas stock--Williams Companies Inc. (WMB)

How reliable is a forward P/E projection on company in anticipating companies expected profits?
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

VALUATION MEASURES

Market Cap (intraday): 14.11B
Enterprise Value (6-Oct-06)3: 20.59B
Trailing P/E (ttm, intraday): 122.69
Forward P/E (fye 31-Dec-07) 1: 16.22
PEG Ratio (5 yr expected): 1.43
Price/Sales (ttm): 1.13
Price/Book (mrq): 2.40
Enterprise Value/Revenue (ttm)3: 1.65
Enterprise Value/EBITDA (ttm)3: 10.882
 

s_dooley24

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 22, 2005
1,437
2
0
Got a question on natural gas stock--Williams Companies Inc. (WMB)

Williams Companies WMB

by Catharina Milostan

Thesis 08-23-2006

With turnaround efforts winding down, Williams is now focused on rebuilding its Rockies and Mid-Continent-based exploration, pipeline, and midstream businesses. Williams has made good progress with its nearly completed asset sale and debt-reduction programs. However, we'd like to see more debt reduction and remain concerned over potential earnings volatility from its still-too-large power-trading portfolio.

Williams has come a long way from its post-Enron liquidity troubles earlier this decade and can now generate cash flow to fund growth plans. We like how Williams is strategically well-positioned in several fast-growing natural-gas producing basins in the Rockies, Mid-Continent, and Gulf Coast with multiple avenues for earnings growth from its integrated natural-gas business. In contrast to many natural-gas producers, Williams can generate earnings by not only selling its natural-gas production, but also by earning fees for gathering, processing, and transporting natural gas via its midstream systems and interstate pipelines.

While a lot of management's attention was focused on restructuring efforts, it still maintained interests in major producing basins with several years of growth potential. Williams now plans to invest more than $1.5-$2 billion in each of the next three years to ramp up natural-gas drilling and to expand midstream and pipeline transportation capacity. In each of these businesses, Williams is well-positioned to reap the benefits of new investments.

Williams' exploration and production (E&P) operation should merit greater attention as it compares favorably with many E&P peers, attaining a top-25 ranking (in terms of U.S. natural-gas production) among U.S. natural-gas producers in 2004, and above-average drilling success and reserve replacement results in 2005. Williams' properties are in highly desirable, lower-risk, and longer-lived "resource type" basins, including large positions in the Powder River Basin in Wyoming and Piceance Basin in Colorado. We look for several years of drilling-driven production gains in these basins.

Williams' midstream operations are well-placed to take advantage of rising demand for gas gathering and processing as drilling activity increases in Rockies and Mid-Continent basins. The company is also set up to add gas gathering tie-ins to new deepwater Gulf of Mexico discoveries. Williams plans to build or expand pipeline transportation capacity to draw more natural gas eastward to markets in the Midwest and Northeast.

Despite the success of its turnaround to date, Williams still faces some hurdles. We'd like to see further debt reduction and remain concerned over its large derivatives portfolio. The company paid down 44% of its debt from 2002 highs and received credit-rating upgrades. However, its debt levels--the firm has a net debt/total capitalization of 49%--are still high compared with peers. The trading business will probably be a drag on earnings and a source of earnings volatility for at least a few more years.


Valuation

We're keeping our fair value estimate at $22 per share as Williams remains on track for drilling and expansion-driven earnings gains expected over the next few years. First-half 2006 results gave us greater visibility into how Williams' investment program is netting gains in production and midstream volumes and margins. Successful drilling results plus price-supported robust cash flows during the first half of 2006 encouraged Williams to boost capital spending plans by another $250 million to a range of $2.2-$2.4 billion for 2006. Most of this increase will be to support drilling and field development at the E&P unit, bringing spending in this segment to over $1 billion. Williams is allocating another $750 million to fund several pipeline projects, and $300 million to expand gathering and processing units. In early 2006, Williams also took another step away from its troubles in 2000-02 with a $175 million aftertax charge for a securities litigation settlement and jury rulings. Williams plans to add drilling rigs, particularly in the Piceance Basin, which should drive production gains later this year and well into 2007-10. We also look for gathering and pipeline expansion projects scheduled for completion in 2007 to drive earnings growth to the end of this decade.

Our model includes assumed benchmark natural-gas prices of $6.90 in 2006, $6.40 in 2007, $6.15 in 2008, and $6.30 in 2009, which were then adjusted for hedging, and the quality and location of Williams natural-gas production. In contrast to E&P-only companies, Williams is less sensitive to natural-gas price changes due to its hedging program and pipeline and midstream businesses, which are less affected by natural-gas price swings. In fact, a 10% upward or downward adjustment in our natural-gas price assumptions changes our fair value estimate by only $1 per share. Our fair value estimate assumes Williams remains a stand-alone firm. Given the price paid for Western Gas WGR, another Rockies-based natural-gas producer with midstream operations, Williams could fetch a handsome price.


Risk

Williams' greatest risk remains potential earnings volatility from its power trading business. After Williams could not find a buyer for this trading unit, it decided to keep the unit and find ways to restructure contracts and reduce risk. The power segment owns derivatives and has contractual obligations extending past 2020. Adding uncertainty, some of Williams' counterparties have below-investment-grade credit ratings. In addition to credit risk, its trading business has market risk. Williams also incurs the typical industry risks such as environmental liability, mechanical failure, and volatile commodity prices.

See Previous Analyst Reports


Close Competitors TTM Sales $Mil Market Cap $Mil
Williams Companies 12,501 14,109
* El Paso 4,505 9,207
* Kinder Morgan 7,227 14,059
* Western Gas Resources 4,114 4,636

* Morningstar Analyst Report Available | Compare These Stocks

Data as of 12-31-2005

Strategy

After restructuring to restore liquidity and reduce debt through asset sales, Williams is now a smaller, integrated natural-gas company. Management can take advantage of strong and steady cash flow generation at its pipeline and midstream units to fund pipeline and gathering expansion projects and greater drilling at its exploration and production unit.

Management & Stewardship

Chairman, president, and CEO Steven Malcolm has remained at the helm throughout Williams' turnaround and can now refocus on Williams' core businesses. Malcolm was promoted to president and CEO in late 2001 and became chairman in early 2002, at the time when the energy trading markets began their post-Enron collapse. Malcolm and the majority of his senior operating team have 15-20 or more years of experience at Williams, including its turnaround years. We give management some credit for its turnaround efforts, as Williams was among the earlier companies (with energy trading units) to forge settlements for the California power crisis and other litigation, and to restructure its debt and balance sheet. After forgoing a bonus in 2002, Malcolm received cash bonuses of $1.6 million in 2003, $2.7 million in 2004, and $2.3 million in 2005. Instead of cash bonuses, we think Malcolm's restricted-stock and option awards, which totaled over $3 million in 2004 and 2005, will serve as better long-term incentives. Overall, Malcolm's pay package looks relatively high but justified given the turnaround he helped orchestrate at Williams. We applaud Williams' effort to boost transparency by holding seminars to discuss its trading business and exploration and development efforts. However, we would like to eventually see a separate chairman and CEO at the helm of Williams.

Profile

Tulsa-based Williams is an integrated natural-gas firm with four business segments: power (formerly energy trading and marketing), exploration and production, gas pipelines, and midstream. Together, the segments produce, gather, process, and transport natural gas. At the end of 2005, Williams had proved natural-gas reserves of 3.4 trillion cubic feet, 14,700 miles of long-haul pipelines, 8,100 miles of gathering pipes, and six gas-processing and -treating facilities.

Growth

Williams' exploration and production, midstream, and pipeline segments have above-average sales growth potential relative to segment peers due to the firm's proximity to growing Rockies and Mid-Continent producing basins and access to end-user markets. Williams' power unit, with its derivatives trading portfolio, could periodically be a drag on earnings.

Profitability

Williams' gas pipeline and midstream segments have fairly stable profits. Its upstream business can be volatile but offers the largest margins over time. The trading business still casts a shadow over firmwide profitability.

Financial Health

Williams has worked hard to reduce its debt, but it still carries a heavy debt load with an above-average 47% debt (net of cash)/capitalization ratio. While the risk of insolvency has diminished, debt-service costs continue to hold back earnings potential. We look for continued efforts to pay down debt over the next few years.

Morningstar Rating
10-05-2006

3*

Stock Price
As of 08-23-2006
$24.61

Fair Value Estimate

$22.00

Consider Buying

$17.00

Consider Selling

$27.60


Business Risk

Avg

Economic Moat

Narrow

Stewardship Grade

B
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,436
132
63
Bowling Green Ky
Thanks Dooley

Have owned this stock a couple of times.
Bought long time ago on what I thought to be double play as they were hyping fiber optic lines they had put in under ground with their lines--didn't amount to sqwat-sold and bought back when they started their comeback--mostly because they continued to pay dividend like it was taboo not to and cheap price made div attractive back then.
 

selkirk

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 16, 1999
2,147
13
0
Canada
good info dooley, own Williams and Duke. they are probably not the most exciting stocks, or should be, however believe they will maintain their div, and grow.

hope to see 10%, also own Enbridge, and TRP. TRP is starting to come off slightly 5-7% below current prices would probably add to positions, same with enb.

so trp and enb would be holds / buy if they drop 5-10%, good divs, that should increase.

in this kind of market, well any kind of market, always good to have income (dividends) coming in to the portfolo.

thanks
selkirk
 

selkirk

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 16, 1999
2,147
13
0
Canada
Nexen

Nexen

as stated before hope to give some detailed info on some of the stocks I own and why.

Nexen

cash flow /share 2005 8.41 2006 9.67 07 15.10
earnings/share 05 4.34 06 4.78 07 7.35

production 2006 222,000-240,000 barrel/day
should grow to 290,000 barrels /day in 2007

costs from 50% Long lake (alberta oil sands) first phase has increased from 3.8 billion to 4.2 billion.

Nexen will spin about 2.8 billion free cash flow this year and 4.1 billion in 2007

Nexen has production in the North Sea, Gulf of Mexico, Alberta (oil sands) and in Yemen.

spending on all of their projects North Sea and mainly alberta oil sands will come in around 3 billion, the free cash flow will easily cover these costs.

note : earnings assuming 58-60 oil.

if oil holds then Nexen should have a good year.

nxy seems to be one of the more volatile snr. stocks I own, on bad days can easily lose 3% and 3% gain.....


thanks
selkirk
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,436
132
63
Bowling Green Ky
a little more recent news on WMB

Global Energy Awards: Williams Is Hydrocarbon Producer of the Year
Friday December 1, 11:53 am ET


TULSA, Okla., Dec. 1 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Williams (NYSE: WMB - News) was named Hydrocarbon Producer of the Year last night at the Global Energy Awards in New York.

Williams was recognized for its success in making reserves additions, demonstrating industry leadership, achieving an attractive return on investment, applying new drilling technology, ensuring environmental stewardship and operational safety, and executing a strategic vision to dramatically increase production.

In less than a decade, Williams has built its Exploration & Production unit from less than 100 million cubic feet of gas equivalent per day in production to an average of more than 830 MMcfe/day at the end of third- quarter 2006.

The company has increased its prominence by specializing in the development of unconventional reserves, including tight-sands gas, coal-bed methane and shale. Williams primarily develops these natural gas reserves in the Piceance, Powder River, San Juan, Arkoma and Fort Worth basins in the United States.

"Williams believes in responsible development," said Steve Malcolm, chairman, president and chief executive officer. "We work closely with contractors, communities and regulators to help produce the energy that our nation needs. Our challenge and our opportunity is to continue to earn the respect of stakeholders in every basin where we're developing our large inventory of low-risk reserves."

In 2005, Williams partnered with a contractor to develop and engineer a new generation of rig. Through applying offshore drilling technology to land, the new rig can simultaneously drill, complete and produce.

These rigs, which are custom-built for conditions in the Piceance Basin, are designed to drill up to 22 wells from a single location utilizing a skid system that allows it to move side-to-side, forward and backward without being disassembled.

"Ultimately, our next-generation rigs should allow Williams to produce more gas using less land - with a target of up to 75 percent fewer well pads where they are deployed in Colorado," Malcolm said.

Williams' goal is to increase its natural gas production to more than 1 billion cubic feet per day. The company has previously announced its plan to invest more than $3 billion in this business during 2006-2008.

At Dec. 31, 2005, Williams had total domestic and international proved natural gas and oil reserves of 3.6 trillion cubic feet equivalent. Also in 2005, the company drilled 1,629 gross wells in 2005, achieving a 99 percent success rate with development costs that are among the lowest in the industry.

Williams' drilling activity last year resulted in the addition of 603 billion cubic feet equivalent in net reserves -- a replacement rate for its U.S. production of 277 percent in 2005.

The Exploration & Production unit is led by Ralph A. Hill, who has been with the company for 25 years. Williams has 550 employees in this business.

"This is truly an exceptional recognition of the hard work and dedication that our employees show every day," Hill said. "I thank them deeply for their efforts to make Williams the best in the industry. Our commitment to new technology, respecting the environment and building community relationships is a major part of our core values."

The Global Energy Awards have been held every year since 1999. The competition is sponsored by Platts - a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies that publishes information about worldwide energy markets and news.

The judging panel consists of international energy experts, energy ministers, regulators, past and present heads of major energy companies, academics and legislators.

Williams' Steve Malcolm was a finalist for CEO of the Year. The category featured a total of 23 nominees and 11 finalists from four countries. Finalists were selected for demonstrating integrity, courage, vision, decisiveness and leadership.

Williams' 14,000-mile natural gas pipeline business also was a finalist for Energy Transporter of the Year.

About Williams (NYSE: WMB - News)

Williams, through its subsidiaries, primarily finds, produces, gathers, processes and transports natural gas. The company also manages a wholesale power business. Williams' operations are concentrated in the Pacific Northwest, Rocky Mountains, Gulf Coast, Southern California and Eastern Seaboard. More information is available at http://www.williams.com .
 

s_dooley24

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 22, 2005
1,437
2
0
I thought that some people may enjoy this article. It covers a little bit about the Canadian Oil Sands which I know Selkirk has mentioned numnerous times before.


Stock Strategist

Recent Developments in the Refining Industry
By Justin Perucki, CFA | 12-08-06 | 06:00 AM

After two decades of fighting to stay in the black, the stars aligned in 2004 and refiners like Valero Energy VLO , Frontier Oil FTO , Sunoco SUN , and Tesoro TSO have been enjoying outsized profits ever since. With mandatory environmental upgrades and hurricane repairs pretty much in the past, and cash flooding in, refiners are setting their sights on boosting capacity, improving reliability, and increasing the complexity of their refineries. This increased investment will likely be the proverbial rain on the parade, driving refining margins back to more reasonable levels.

Growing Refining Capacity
As a refresher, a refiner's gross refining margin is essentially the difference between the price it sells a barrel of refined product and the price it pays for a barrel of oil. The more money a refiner receives for its products and the cheaper it can buy its oil, the more money it makes.

Refining bulls always make the argument that margins should remain wide forever, because a new refinery hasn't been built in the U.S. since the 1970s. But after increasing by 210,000 barrels per day (b/d), or about 1.2%, in 2005, domestic refining capacity is expected to increase by 2 million barrels per day by 2010, a 12% increase. Although all of this expansion is in the form of improvements to existing refineries, it represents the equivalent of eight new world-class facilities.

Expansion is proceeding at full steam worldwide as well--worldwide capacity is expected to grow by more than 10 million barrels per day over the same period. The majority of that capacity is being built in the thirsty and growing Asian market. Also, Saudi Arabia is planning twin 500,000 b/d export refineries, with one unit targeting Asia and the other targeting Europe and North America. Due to differing environmental regulations around the globe, refined products are not as fungible as raw crude oil, but the additional capacity should cause margins to contract worldwide as capacity growth is expected to outpace demand growth over that time period.

Improvements in Refining Complexity
In addition to capacity additions, refiners are also looking to improve the complexity of their refineries. This will allow them to handle poorer-quality crudes that often sell on the cheap and to produce higher-margin products like gasoline and ultralow-sulfur diesel. We think this is an excellent way to improve the competitive position of a refinery, as it makes a refinery less susceptible to periods of weak demand.

Low-quality crudes are expected to make up a growing proportion of the worldwide oil production mix. One of the drivers behind this influx of poor-quality crude is the number of Canadian oil-sands projects coming online over the next several years. ConocoPhillips COP and BP BP recently announced large-scale expansions designed specifically to handle Canadian crude from the oil sands.

However, we have concerns that too much conversion capacity is being built. While production from the oil sands is expected to be heavy, the oil could be upgraded (i.e., converted into a higher-quality oil) in Canada before being transported to U.S. refiners, and this upgraded oil is expected to sell on par with light-sweet crude, the worldwide oil price benchmark. There are also several proposals to build an oil pipeline to the west coast of Canada, where the oil could then be shipped to other areas of the globe, namely Asia. Too much conversion capacity and too little heavy oil would cause the price of heavy oil to be bid up, eliminating the incremental margins earned by processing this type of crude.

Weighing an Investment in Refining
We believe that gross refining margins will remain above their long-run averages, but some risks remain. A simultaneous increase in refining capacity and a slowdown in economic activity would cause refining margins to collapse for a period of time. Moreover, engineering and construction firms like Chicago Bridge and Iron CBI , Fluor FLR , and Foster Wheeler FWLT are enjoying large amounts of pricing power, which could potentially inhibit returns for these expansion and improvement projects. Tesoro recently pulled a project off the table after a revised cost estimate for a proposed project increased by more than 40%. If more refiners pull or delay projects, we would expect the gross refining margins of complex refiners like Valero or Frontier to remain high for an extended period of time.

While we are cautiously optimistic about the future of the industry, we suggest that investors still itching to gain exposure to the refining industry set their sights on the major integrated oil companies like BP, Chevron CVX , ConocoPhillips, ExxonMobil XOM , and Royal Dutch Shell RDS.A . The majors have loads of refining capacity not only in the U.S., but also in emerging markets. Moreover, unlike pure-play refiners, they have substantial upstream operations that generate stronger and more-stable returns on capital over the course of the cycle.

Justin Perucki, CFA is a stock analyst with Morningstar.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top