Sorry, OAKAS, I'm just seeing this post now.
I was working on a post but got a little too involved with last Saturday's insane NCAA hoops board.
Also, while I'm finding the props--both NFL & NHL--to often be a WAY better way to go (especially for teams that I know like the back of my hand, e.g. Chiefs & Maple Leafs), I dropped a bit on last week's selections (last 4-game slate; the post mentioned).
I think my analysis in that post was pretty kosher (save for my expecting the Ravens to maybe have a play or two up their sleeve), so hopefully there was something to be garnered from that. My big play in that one was Mostert to rush for a TD but they split drives between Mostert and Coleman, with Coleman being the only one scoring. Considering the Packers Rush D was, if anything, a step down from the Vikings rush D, I expected a similar game plan with the non-stop rush attack. Chiefs was Damien as he remained generously priced, and Hill as he was obviously going to be an endzone threat. Gotta love those little jet-sweep passes where he flips it to Hill and he runs it in left corner; I recently re-watched the 2018 opener with Chiefs@Chargers--Mahomes 1st start with the non-backups in (week 17 2017 he got a start, but no Kelce, Hill, etc)--and they ran the exact same play that they did vs the Titans on Sunday.
The Super Bowl props will be a daunting tackle for me. Not sure whether to really try and crunch some positional matchups to find out who has an advantage or to simply use the K.I.S.S. rule, which often works for me this time of year; I freakin' love the playoffs in any sport.
Probably too long a rant to simply say I missed this, but this is more attention than I have been getting from my imaginary children these days so I appreciate your sentiments.
