Flames-Ducks Series opinions welcome

DZ

Urban Achiever
Forum Member
Oct 22, 2009
11,819
119
63
310/917
I'm seeing as high as -240/+200 up from an opener in the -200/+170 area. I'm a little bit surprised the price on the series was that high to begin with, so I guess I don't agree with the line move. I know the Ducks look like a powerhouse with Kesler, Getzlaf and Perry, among others, but I think the Flames are a good team and are being discounted here. They seem to be playing inspired hockey and could be a dangerous underdog in this situation.

Now, hockey isn't my strong suit from a handicapping standpoint, so I'm appealing to those wiser than me in this forum, but I think that the Flames have better chance to win this series than the odds reflect (about 69%/31%). It didn't seem to me that the Ducks really dominated the Jets in the last round, even though they swept. If you tally it up, they only led for about 41 of the 245 total minutes played in that series. A lot of late 3rd period comebacks plus the overtime win, seems like they've been pretty lucky. Not to mention their goal differential on the season was only +10, which seems low for a team that won 51 games with total of 109 points.

Calgary's situation in goal may not appear to be ideal, with Hiller getting pulled early in game 6 against the 'Nucks after giving up two early goals, but this was top level goalie in the regular season in terms of SV% and GAA. I like the fact that he is returning to face his old team in Anaheim (already getting the nod for game 1). This is the same team that gave up on him last year after seven seasons with the club, so maybe he's got something to prove against them.

I know the odds don't reflect the following statement, but I think that of the two bigger underdogs in the 2nd round, the Flames have a better chance of beating the Ducks than the Caps have of upsetting the Rangers, but that's probably just the fan in me speaking :lol:

Anybody else have an opinion on this series? :shrug:
 

Snafu

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 16, 2002
8,492
222
63
Finland
Thanks for the write up.

I think main reason line being what it is is that Calgary is 0-15-5 (regular season) @ Anaheim.
They won 2006 one game in play offs but lost serie 4-3.

I lean heavily on Ducks because they scored plenty even strength goals against Jets
in four matches 13EV(1EN) and 3PP. Calgary six matches 13EV(2EN) and 5 PP.

Of course we can stare stats all day but imo team that get's to play in it's "comfort zone" wins
and that goes to Ana. They play until game ends and don't give up or panic. They need to improve
their PP and stay out of the penalty box. And imo, most importantly, they play and control game well
without puck = let the other guy skate around but keep him away from danger zone. I think that's one reason to late come backs ?

Goalies are quite even i think, both had 2.20 1st round average, but i still except games to stay
mostly under, maybe one "crazy match"...


I'm sure this is going to be good serie :toast:


:0008
 

DZ

Urban Achiever
Forum Member
Oct 22, 2009
11,819
119
63
310/917
Thanks for the write up.

I think main reason line being what it is is that Calgary is 0-15-5 (regular season) @ Anaheim.
They won 2006 one game in play offs but lost serie 4-3.

I lean heavily on Ducks because they scored plenty even strength goals against Jets
in four matches 13EV(1EN) and 3PP. Calgary six matches 13EV(2EN) and 5 PP.

Of course we can stare stats all day but imo team that get's to play in it's "comfort zone" wins
and that goes to Ana. They play until game ends and don't give up or panic. They need to improve
their PP and stay out of the penalty box. And imo, most importantly, they play and control game well
without puck = let the other guy skate around but keep him away from danger zone. I think that's one reason to late come backs ?

Goalies are quite even i think, both had 2.20 1st round average, but i still except games to stay
mostly under, maybe one "crazy match"...


I'm sure this is going to be good serie :toast:


:0008

Appreciate your take on the series, sir :0008
 

DZ

Urban Achiever
Forum Member
Oct 22, 2009
11,819
119
63
310/917
So I ended up with the Flames for the series. I see Kickserv agrees, but refuses to share his thoughts with us. :sadwave:
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top