1st5 angels +111 1/1.11
angels +106 1/1.06
I've been avoiding the constant temptation to play Bosox games over--e.g. in any of the series
with texas--fortunately, as the Sox bats have been grim with little sign of improvement.
Angelsticks aren't stormin', either, but I prefer them here.
Definitely prefer Richards to Porcello. Latter hasn't been bad but some angelsticks have had success
and Rick is more of a fly-ball pitcher and there's allegedly a strong wind blowing out to right.
Porcello's upside used to hold promise but he's remaining B-grade stuff while Richards' is fulfilling
much of his expected upside.
Both bullpens frighten me equally but the bet is split due to the better price for the 1st5.
Angels BP is actually a little better; I certainly trust Street to close it.
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/aRpJeYiXV6E" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
angels +106 1/1.06
I've been avoiding the constant temptation to play Bosox games over--e.g. in any of the series
with texas--fortunately, as the Sox bats have been grim with little sign of improvement.
Angelsticks aren't stormin', either, but I prefer them here.
Definitely prefer Richards to Porcello. Latter hasn't been bad but some angelsticks have had success
and Rick is more of a fly-ball pitcher and there's allegedly a strong wind blowing out to right.
Porcello's upside used to hold promise but he's remaining B-grade stuff while Richards' is fulfilling
much of his expected upside.
Both bullpens frighten me equally but the bet is split due to the better price for the 1st5.
Angels BP is actually a little better; I certainly trust Street to close it.
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/aRpJeYiXV6E" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
