Golf Forum Recap

Stanley

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 26, 1999
11,801
26
0
Manchester, England
www.tour-tips.com
Outrights Leaderboard
-------------------------

PGS ... 1-0; +41.25 units [Watney 66/1 1st]

Lostinamerica ... 1-8; +9.00 units [Watney 17/1 1st]



Matchups Leaderboard
-------------------------

c20916 ... 11-3; +8.05 units

Chip Hilton ... 21-14; +6.30 units

Pharlap ... 2-0; +2.00 units

AK2009Masters ... 1-0; +1.00 units

Lostinamerica ... 2-1; +0.90 units



2009 HALL OF FAME (ytd)

Outrights

1. PGS +34.50 units
2. c20916 +19.00 units
3. Lostinamerica +15.29 units
4. JimmyTime +14.00 units
5. Another Steve +13.00 units


Matchups

1. c20916 +22.90 units
2. Pharlap +11.73 units
3. Stanley +7.25 units
4. Chip Hilton +6.30 units
5. Lostinamerica +4.78 units
6. DerrickTulips +3.29 units
7. BUCSnotYUCKS +2.05 units
8. Ak2009Masters +2.00 units
9. jr11 +1.05 units
10. Sports student +1.00 units
10. Toto +1.00 units
 
Last edited:

DerrickTulips

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 6, 2008
3,219
3
0
Stan I went (4 - 4 and down .31 units this week)
Marino -105 over Snedeker (72)
Streelman -120 over JB Holmes (72)
Quinney -120 over Goydos (72)
Lunde -120 over Turnesa (72)

Sutherland -135 over Curtis (72) <-- got this one from one of Stan's workers.
Watney +134 over Kraft and Oberholser for round 1.
Mathis -120 over Stiles - second round
Mathis -125 over Gore - Fourth Round


My plays must have gotten hidden between all of my post.. disappointing week, congrats phar. :toast:
 

Chip Hilton

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 14, 2008
1,070
0
0
RI
Record

Record

Just checking to compare records even though I have it very close to the same. I recorded as I went along but may have made it even more confusing for myself. I know I made alot of plays so if you are busy, no need to double check me. If you do though, can you can tell me where I may have recorded wrong. I like to keep tabs on who I win on and who I lose on over the course of the year.

Thanks for all your tips. I believe you base everything on one unit so here's my summary:

Round One : 6-2-2, +3.55 units based equally (+6.25 for my units)

Round Two : 5-4-0, +1.20 units based equally (+2.10 for my units)

Round Three : 2-1-1, +0.95 units based equally (+4.00 for my units)

Round Four : 1-2-1, -1.15 units based equally (-4.50 for my units)

Full Tournament : 7-4-0, +2.75 units based equally (+3.60 for my units)


Total of all Matchups : 21-13-4, +7.30 units based equally (+11.45 for my units)
 

lostinamerica

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 10, 2001
7,282
166
63
Between Green Bay and Iowa City
Stan a/k/a Mr. Big:

Sorry to bother, but I was 2-1-1 (+0.90*) in Matchups:

Sutherland(-135) over Curtis (Tournament) (W)
Frazar(-120) over Huston (Saturday) (W)
Goydos(-110) over Leishman (Sunday) (L)
Hoffman(+105) over Baddeley (Sunday) (P)


PGS - Righteous call on Watney. :toast:

"?If you're going to lead for one hole, this is the time to do it,? Watney, 27, said with a wide grin."

""New Orleans was euphoric," Watney said. "This one, it's euphoric, but at the same time, I was almost in a trance. It was a very weird feeling. This one I'm really trying to soak it in."


GL
 

DerrickTulips

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 6, 2008
3,219
3
0
Hell of a start C2.. can you hit me up at my email ( check my profile), I have a question in regards to the WSEX book that you use. Thanks
 

Stanley

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 26, 1999
11,801
26
0
Manchester, England
www.tour-tips.com
Thanks for the posts, guys. This forum recap isn't worth very much if the records are wrong!

c20916

Yes, you're right. The leaderboard that my file queries had Sutherland marked down for 46 in round 2 (his number of strokes before withdrawing). It had wrongly credited your round 2 Watney/Oberholser play as a loss.


Chip Hilton

In terms of your round 1 plays, "Rory Sabbatini over Dustin Johnson/Fred Couples @ + 115. Push" is actually a loss. Sabbatini had 76, Johnson 74 and Couples 74. Hence I get 21-14 rather than 21-13.

The other cause of the difference in the totals is that I incorrectly entered -115 rather than -155 as the odds for the losing round 2 Mickelson/Curtis match.


Lostinamerica

Yes, you're right. I'd missed off the Sutherland/Curtis matchup from the bottom of your first post.
 

Chip Hilton

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 14, 2008
1,070
0
0
RI
Thanks

Thanks

Chip Hilton

In terms of your round 1 plays, "Rory Sabbatini over Dustin Johnson/Fred Couples @ + 115. Push" is actually a loss. Sabbatini had 76, Johnson 74 and Couples 74. Hence I get 21-14 rather than 21-13.

The other cause of the difference in the totals is that I incorrectly entered -115 rather than -155 as the odds for the losing round 2 Mickelson/Curtis match.

Thanks for taking the time to review, particulary mine when I went a bit overboard with the number of plays. I guess I just enjoyed getting back into it after a nice break with football and hoops.

Yes, that Curtis one hurt @ -155, but I beat Lefty that day with some good odds too. Curtis finally did what I was hoping for on the final day.

The other one leads me to a question I had for you. When I list say, Sabbatini over Johnson&Couples (with the &), my plays are graded in accordance with most books and graded with Sabbatini over both (&) Johnson & Couples. However for one book it seems, when I list it as Sabbatini over Johnson/Couples (with the /), if any two tie, it pushes. I don't know if they factor that into the odds or if I just caught a break, but I was wondering if you ever heard of that situation. Thanks.
 
Last edited:

Stanley

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 26, 1999
11,801
26
0
Manchester, England
www.tour-tips.com
The other one leads me to a question I had for you. When I list say, Sabbatini over Johnson&Couples (with the &), my plays are graded in accordance with most books and graded with Sabbatini over both (&) Johnson & Couples. However for one book it seems, when I list it as Sabbatini over Johnson/Couples (with the /), if any two tie, it pushes. I don't know if they factor that into the odds or if I just caught a break, but I was wondering if you ever heard of that situation. Thanks.

I think that you caught a break ;) You shouldn't get a push on a wager when you back a player who finishes last of three. If the book is Five Dimes, I'm not surprised. They do tend to have a lot of misgradings in my experience. Can be hassle, but I don't mind 'cos I only let them know of the ones that didn't go in my favour :)
 

Chip Hilton

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 14, 2008
1,070
0
0
RI
Not 5Dimes

Not 5Dimes

I'll take it as a break since I certainly didn't deserve a push on that one. Sabbatini really disappointed me this weekend as he seemed to be one of the "hot" names early in the week.

It wasn't 5dimes, as they always seem to grade me correctly. I better make sure I recheck everything though as I'm sure it happens here and there.
 

DerrickTulips

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 6, 2008
3,219
3
0
I think that you caught a break ;) You shouldn't get a push on a wager when you back a player who finishes last of three. If the book is Five Dimes, I'm not surprised. They do tend to have a lot of misgradings in my experience. Can be hassle, but I don't mind 'cos I only let them know of the ones that didn't go in my favour :)

:toast:
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top