Golf Forum Recap

[Stanley]

Outrights Leaderboard
-------------------------

No-one in profit this week.



Matchups Leaderboard
-------------------------

Stanley ... 3-0; +3.20 units

Trampled Underfoot ... 4-1; +2.65 units

DerrickTulips ... 2-1; +0.80 units

Another Steve ... 6-4: +0.70 units

Chip Hilton ... 7-5; +0.45 units



2010 HALL OF FAME (ytd)

Outrights

1. scrub +73.00 units
2. xodale +13.13 units
3. Chip Hilton +4.25 units
4. IX Bender +1.70 units
5. DerrickTulips +1.00 units


Matchups

1. Stanley +26.99 units
2. Whalers Rule +17.10 units
3. Chip Hilton +15.00 units
4. sharky17 +12.21 units
5. DerrickTulips +8.10 units
6. CANADA MAN +7.83 units
7. Trampled Underfoot +4.75 units
8. IX Bender +4.15 units
9. JimmyTime +3.75 units
10. orient +2.12 units
11. stomie +2.10 units
12. az sundevil +1.85 units
13. Another Steve +1.70 units
14. hedgehog0721 +1.35 units
15. Lostinamerica +1.24 units
16. LDB +1.00 units
17. 6 under +0.48 units
18. AK2009Masters +0.40 units
19. sports student +0.15 units
20. Andre +0.06 units

 

[Chip Hilton]

Zurich

Zurich

Stanley -- I usually don't even bother checking my plays but since I had much less this tourney I did.

Here's what I came up with:


Full Tournament : 0 - 1 ( - 1.10)

Round One afternoon : 4 - 1 ( + 2.50)

Round Two morning : 2 - 1 ( + 0.90)

Round Two afternoon : 1 - 2 ( - 1.85)


Total for week : 7 - 5 ( + 0.45)

It looks like you may have only counted my last set of picks.

Let me know if I am wrong. As I said, I rarely even check especially lately with the number of plays. THANKS.

 

[Trampled Underfoot]

I used to not care about this but it's getting competitive in here.

I went 4-1 this week. Not 3-2.

4-1 +2.65

Thanks Stanley.

 

[Chip Hilton]

Agreed

Agreed

I used to not care about this but it's getting competitive in here.
Thanks Stanley.

I would hope it's to see who is hot rather than being a competitive thread. I prefer to think we are all helping each other and sharing our picks and information rather than attempting to climb the leaderboard. Although I know DerrickTulips has an eye on catching Stanley. Just kidding with ya DT as I enjoy all the info you share.

Personally I should just post my three unit plays and up as my one and two unit plays are just for action and I obviously I get carried away with them at times. I'm sure I am faring better on those than the one and two unit plays although it doesn't always happen that way.

That being said, I admire many of you who can be very selective in this process. Too many times the matches I eliminate end up winning (at least it seems like that too often) so I play the borderline picks at very small amounts.

My question to those of you who can be selective is do you generally just zone in on a particular matchup or two or do you consider a fair amount of the matchups and then narrow them down. I fall into the second group as I don't zone in on anything specifically but look at a variety of things that lead me to consider many matches. Just curious how some of you end up with just a specific match or two. Thanks.

 

[Trampled Underfoot]

I would hope it's to see who is hot rather than being a competitive thread. I prefer to think we are all helping each other and sharing our picks and information rather than attempting to climb the leaderboard. Although I know DerrickTulips has an eye on catching Stanley. Just kidding with ya DT as I enjoy all the info you share.

Personally I should just post my three unit plays and up as my one and two unit plays are just for action and I obviously I get carried away with them at times. I'm sure I am faring better on those than the one and two unit plays although it doesn't always happen that way.

That being said, I admire many of you who can be very selective in this process. Too many times the matches I eliminate end up winning (at least it seems like that too often) so I play the borderline picks at very small amounts.

My question to those of you who can be selective is do you generally just zone in on a particular matchup or two or do you consider a fair amount of the matchups and then narrow them down. I fall into the second group as I don't zone in on anything specifically but look at a variety of things that lead me to consider many matches. Just curious how some of you end up with just a specific match or two. Thanks.

I used to be an action junkie too. Now I just have a few things that I look for. If I find them I play them. I am able to stay more in control if I play just a few matchups. I'm amazed at how well you do with so many matchups. Hats off to you. I also usually play all bets for the same amount. Its hard enough to find a play but then deciding how much to wager on it.

I used to bet outrights really heavy years ago, and almost no matchups. However, being in the US has really limited my outright market. I'm finding the matchups aren't too bad. It would be sick to go weeks without hitting an outright winner.

 

[Stanley]

Yes, you're both right ... you both opposed Perez in round 2 and my spreadsheet recorded his score as 42! He withdrew, so those losses should have been wins :mj1:

 

[Chip Hilton]

42

42

42 would have been tough to beat but fortunetely, Pat Perez had a few more holes to go before he checked out. David Toms had a nice day anyways opposing him with a - 3 (69).

Thanks Stanley.