Green Bay Packers Preview From BetOnline

IE

Administrator
Forum Admin
Forum Member
Mar 15, 1999
95,440
223
63
In the NFC North, the Chicago Bears, Minnesota Vikings and even the Detroit Lions have garnered more online betting attention than the Green Bay Packers. And while the other three teams have made wholesale changes at the quarterback position this offseason, the Green Bay Packers should be considered king.



The Vikings are banking on Favre and his gimpy arm to last, the Bears are hoping that gunslinger Jay Cutler can still be a Pro Bowl pivot at Soldier Field and the Lions are hoping that first-overall pick Matt Stafford is the real deal. While those teams have stolen all the headlines, the Packers could be the ones stealing the wins when they meet in the regular season.



Consistency



Everytime the offseason rolls around, people making their NFL predictions always seem to fall in love with the teams that make the biggest splashes in free agency. As the Washington Redskins have shown us, that doesn't always work out.



The NFL odds makers know that the Green Bay Packers are a potential sleeper because they have so much consistency on their roster.



On offense, the Packers bring back the entire unit, which only figures to get stronger. Quarterback Aaron Rodgers was a first-year starter last year, running back Ryan Grant had just received his payday and receiver Greg Jennings was breaking out into Pro Bowl form. All three will only get better this year.



The spotlight has - and will - shine on Grant after finishing with just four touchdowns last year. He started slow (137 carries for 464 yards in September and October) but finished strong (175 carries for 739 yards in November and December). He's looked particularly sharp in the preseason as well.



Transitioning To The 3-4



The Packers defense was awful last year yet the team finished 8-8. What does that say for their potential if the defense improves slightly?



In the offseason, the Packers missed out on a few sexy defensive coordinators and ended up with the tried, tested and true: Dom Capers. He's employing a schematic switch from the 4-3 style to the 3-4 and usually, there is supposed to be a year of growing pains. Not many people making their sports picks expected the Packers defense to be this good already.



One of the toughest aspects of switching to the 3-4 is finding linebacker depth but the Packers have plenty of it. From holdovers Nick Barnett and A.J. Hawk, to the additions of second-round pick Clay Matthews, to the shift of end Aaron Kampman to outsider linebacker, to the emergence of third-year player Desmond Bishop, to the resurgence of veteran Brady Poppinga, the Packers have tons of options at linebacker.



The secondary returns intact, which should allow plenty of time for the front seven to develop. By the looks of it, they don't need much more time.



NFC Outlook



The Packers have the youngest roster in the NFL and should have a growth spurt this year. They won eight games with a horrible defense last year and if they improve along with the offense, which is completely feasible, the Packers not only could - but should - win the NFC North. Keep an eye on them for their Super Bowl odds as this team could be the biggest sleeper in the NFC.
 

bleedingpurple

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 23, 2008
22,384
222
63
51
Where it is real F ing COLD
The Packers defense was awful last year yet the team finished 8-8. What does that say for their potential if the defense improves slightly?

Not many people making their sports picks expected the Packers defense to be this good already.

One of the toughest aspects of switching to the 3-4 is finding linebacker depth but the Packers have plenty of it. From holdovers Nick Barnett and A.J. Hawk, to the additions of second-round pick Clay Matthews, to the shift of end Aaron Kampman to outsider linebacker, to the emergence of third-year player Desmond Bishop, to the resurgence of veteran Brady Poppinga, the Packers have tons of options at linebacker.



The secondary returns intact, which should allow plenty of time for the front seven to develop. By the looks of it, they don't need much more time.

Obviously I hate the Packers but I will pick them with my brain. Whoever wrote this article for betonline is already full of shit..

1. The Packers didn't finish 8 - 8 last year. They were 6 - 10.

2.He says that not many expected their defense to be this good already. What are they going by, 2 meaningless pre season games against a hapless browns team and the bills without TO. :mj07: Not to say that they won't be better than last year but to tout a defense by pre season is plain dumb.

3. This linebacker crew that they have has been a complete disappointment. Maybe they will excel in in the 3 - 4, but Barnett coming of injury but is always consistent. AJ Hawk has been a disappointment almost a bust. Matthews is a rookie. Kampman is good but always played D line. Brady Poppinga is a fucking joke. Always out of place and he can't cover a back or a TE when he needs to...

4. Secondary is intact, but Harris and Woodson are aging. Bigby and Collins are injury prone.

5. He didn't mention much about the D line.. WHy? Because they have shit.. Raji will be fine in time but he will take lumps this year.

6. The Pack will have to make damn sure Rodgers doesn't miss anytime.. They have nothing to back him up. Although I think Rodgers will be a top 5 QB stats wise this year if healthy. No Doubt.

7. Offensive line is not very impressive and gets dominated against good defensive teams.

All in all for this person to say the pack should win the North is fucking crazy. There is a reason why the Defense was so horseshit last year and moving to a 3 -4 won't help much this year. I could be eating crow but that is my opinion.
 
Last edited:

Livin'tillthEnd

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 7, 2008
5,466
47
0
Dallas
You better hope not

You better hope not

:142smilie

Obviously I hate the Packers but I will pick them with my brain. Whoever wrote this article for betonline is already full of shit..

1. The Packers didn't finish 8 - 8 last year. They were 6 - 10.

2.He says that not many expected their defense to be this good already. What are they going by, 2 meaningless pre season games against a hapless browns team and the bills without TO. :mj07: Not to say that they won't be better than last year but to tout a defense by pre season is plain dumb.

3. This linebacker crew that they have has been a complete disappointment. Maybe they will excel in in the 3 - 4, but Barnett coming of injury but is always consistent. AJ Hawk has been a disappointment almost a bust. Matthews is a rookie. Kampman is good but always played D line. Brady Poppinga is a fucking joke. Always out of place and he can't cover a back or a TE when he needs to...

4. Secondary is intact, but Harris and Woodson are aging. Bigby and Collins are injury prone.

5. He didn't mention much about the D line.. WHy? Because they have shit.. Raji will be fine in time but he will take lumps this year.

6. The Pack will have to make damn sure Rodgers doesn't miss anytime.. They have nothing to back him up. Although I think Rodgers will be a top 5 QB stats wise this year if healthy. No Doubt.

7. Offensive line is not very impressive and gets dominated against good defensive teams.

All in all for this person to say the pack should win the North is fucking crazy. There is a reason why the Defense was so horseshit last year and moving to a 3 -4 won't help much this year. I could be eating crow but that is my opinion.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top