GuRu's Gimme's

GuRu

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 22, 2005
58
0
0
Hi, new to posting, long time lurker.

Definite plays:

Fla St (-7) - Virginia
I think Fla St is just too strong and two quick. Running game alone should cover 7

Ohio ST - Mich St. - (+6)
Drew Stanton is the real deal (and that is coming from a Wolverine fan). This offense will at least keep it close. If it wasnt in the horseshoe Id be giving the money line a look-see

UCLA (-6) - Washington St
First road test of the year for the Bruins if you can call it a test. Should roll 'em up. I cant get that loss to Stanford off my brain. My only worry is a slow start or a backdoor cover after a huge emotional victory last week

Auburn (-7.5) - Arkansas
I (like others) think this line is only so low because it is Auburn's first road game. Shouldnt really be a problem though, Auburn has really pulled it together lately. Ive had a chance to see Arkansas play, and I havent been impressed. Georgia looming next week for them as well.....

Alabama (-12.5) - Ole Miss
I love the tide. It seems that everyone loves the Tide right now which is my only concern. Other than that, I think this could be an easy cover. Probably my most confident play. 3 touchdowns easy IMHO

Leans:

USC/ND - Under 69
Rivalry game. I think both teams are going to try and prove who's the better coach and establish the run even though they could easily turn this one into a track meet. Close game and low sxoring, clock management being key. In the 60's but still liking the under

Pitt - South Fla (+1.5)
If Waanstead didnt coach Pitt, youd never hear about them. They really are god awful

Miami (-41) - Temple
Temple is arguably the worst team in colelge football. Miami rolled up Duke last week with ease, and I doubt Temple even scores in this game. Miami names the score and it should be over 41.
 
Last edited:

gman2

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2002
9,827
16
0
GuRu said:
Fla St (-7) - Virginia
I think Fla St is just too strong and two quick. Running game alone should cover 7

while fsu is more than capable of covering the game, their running game has been awful this year despite having two good running backs. the noles are a mediocre 89th/117 in the nation in rushing offense. and thats what scares me. weatherford is getting better but do you really want to put the game in his hands on the road?
 

GuRu

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 22, 2005
58
0
0
gman2 said:
while fsu is more than capable of covering the game, their running game has been awful this year despite having two good running backs. the noles are a mediocre 89th/117 in the nation in rushing offense. and thats what scares me. weatherford is getting better but do you really want to put the game in his hands on the road?

Thanks for the input gman. I appreciate it have always enjoyed your write-ups (Central Michigan alum here :clap: )

The fact that you are uneasy about my selection isnt exactly comforting but I still think they can cover 7.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top