Hard to beat the same team 3 times in a row?

DZ

Urban Achiever
Forum Member
Oct 22, 2009
11,819
119
63
310/917
Not so fast...

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">It's officially "hard to beat a team three times in a row" season... <br><br>In the last 10 seasons, the team that is 2-0 in a matchup has won game number three 72% of the time: <a href="https://t.co/niUQtJWCtj">pic.twitter.com/niUQtJWCtj</a></p>— Jordan Sperber (@hoopvision68) <a href="https://twitter.com/hoopvision68/status/1102285710034432001?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 3, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 

DZ

Urban Achiever
Forum Member
Oct 22, 2009
11,819
119
63
310/917
ATS numbers

ATS numbers

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Same "hard to beat a team three times in a row" table as above, but against the spread results. Data from statfox back to 2010: <a href="https://t.co/4FwTOnLmnP">pic.twitter.com/4FwTOnLmnP</a></p>— Jordan Sperber (@hoopvision68) <a href="https://twitter.com/hoopvision68/status/1102380501741039617?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 4, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 

Dog lover

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 7, 2001
538
23
18
Austin,Tx. USA
With respect to the team that won the first two games, how many times (or what percentage of times) does that team cover the spread in the third meeting? That would be a more helpful stat.
 

DZ

Urban Achiever
Forum Member
Oct 22, 2009
11,819
119
63
310/917
With respect to the team that won the first two games, how many times (or what percentage of times) does that team cover the spread in the third meeting? That would be a more helpful stat.

Unless I'm not understanding this right, I believe the 2nd post in this thread answers that :shrug:
 

Dog lover

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 7, 2001
538
23
18
Austin,Tx. USA
Sorry, must have been reading #2 chart wrong. In conclusion, ML may be the only way to go, depending on how high the price.
 

Macgruder23

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 28, 2008
2,440
11
0
buffalo ny
St Pete?s won
Pacific lost
Indiana St lost
Loyola won .
That?s what I know off top of my head 2-2 thus far


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

DZ

Urban Achiever
Forum Member
Oct 22, 2009
11,819
119
63
310/917
Sorry, must have been reading #2 chart wrong. In conclusion, ML may be the only way to go, depending on how high the price.

I'm not sure this is meant to demonstrate a trend or "system" per say. I think it is intended more to dissuade bettors or dispel the common misconception that it is somehow hard to beat the same team three times in a season.

:toast:
 

DZ

Urban Achiever
Forum Member
Oct 22, 2009
11,819
119
63
310/917
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">So far this month the team that is 2-0 going into game number three is 28-14 (67%) <a href="https://t.co/YSVArLgfui">https://t.co/YSVArLgfui</a></p>— Jordan Sperber (@hoopvision68) <a href="https://twitter.com/hoopvision68/status/1104917489857822720?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 11, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top