Hard to believe the refs missed that o-foul on Waiters...
- Thread starter T
- Start date
- Oct 15, 2015
- 3,006
- 20
- 38
Pretty sure Chris Webber had $ on the Spurs considering his reaction lol
Also, the rule states that the defender must give the in-bounder 3 feet and he didn't. So I guess they cancel each other out.
Also, the rule states that the defender must give the in-bounder 3 feet and he didn't. So I guess they cancel each other out.
- Sep 1, 2012
- 9,827
- 740
- 113
- Oct 15, 2015
- 3,006
- 20
- 38
I also didn't have money on the game :facepalm:
There certainly was a violation on the offense. I'm just saying the defender clearly didn't give the in bounder proper space. For crying out loud Ginobili's feet touched the line 2x.
You can't base your opinion purely off 1 result.
There certainly was a violation on the offense. I'm just saying the defender clearly didn't give the in bounder proper space. For crying out loud Ginobili's feet touched the line 2x.
You can't base your opinion purely off 1 result.
- Sep 1, 2012
- 9,827
- 740
- 113
- Oct 15, 2015
- 3,006
- 20
- 38
People are acting as if the Spurs would've won if that "violation" or whatever you want to call it is called.
Personally, wasn't the 2 on 1 after OKC turning the ball over more of a better chance?
Personally, wasn't the 2 on 1 after OKC turning the ball over more of a better chance?
- Sep 1, 2012
- 9,827
- 740
- 113
Ginobli over the line (that's a fouls smokey, you were over the line), kawhi was literally grabbing westbrook's jersey, and the Spurs got a 3-1 break out of it. They got their asses beat at home - they need to just try and get one back now
- Oct 15, 2015
- 3,006
- 20
- 38
Ginobili said it best. Having a 2 on 1 fast break and not scoring, getting the rebound and not scoring, is the reason they lost.
If the Spurs scored on that steal T, you wouldn't even be griping.
If the Spurs scored on that steal T, you wouldn't even be griping.
- Oct 15, 2015
- 3,006
- 20
- 38
Hey T,
I'm sure you don't think there's anything wrong with this either...
http://blacksportsonline.com/home/2...s-steven-adams-arm-on-final-possession-video/
I'm sure you don't think there's anything wrong with this either...
http://blacksportsonline.com/home/2...s-steven-adams-arm-on-final-possession-video/
- Oct 15, 2015
- 3,006
- 20
- 38
Hell, while we're at it, lets not leave out Leonard clearly grabbing Westbrooks jersey as he's running away from him. That should've been 2 shots + the ball.
https://twitter.com/sam_amick/status/727360732593971200
https://twitter.com/sam_amick/status/727360732593971200
- Aug 11, 2011
- 1,174
- 10
- 38
you think this woman was attempting to give an unfair advantage to the spurs? it may have inadvertently given them one, but she was clearly knocked off her feet and trying to stand back up and probably just assumed he would do the gentleman thing by helping her up, but she didn't realize the play was still live and that had zero chance of happening.. or maybe you're right and she was waiting for this opportunity to carry out her long thought out plot to steal a game in san antonio
- Oct 15, 2015
- 3,006
- 20
- 38
i see you like to create your own stories.
so if the offensive foul was called on Waiters, the Spurs would've won? Not because the Spurs had a 2 on 1 fast break, right?
- Sep 1, 2012
- 9,827
- 740
- 113
Like I said you're both 100% WRONG...
http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/1...win-san-antonio-spurs-offensive-foul-refs-say
It was an offensive foul...end of story.
Blown call.
http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/1...win-san-antonio-spurs-offensive-foul-refs-say
It was an offensive foul...end of story.
Blown call.
- Oct 15, 2015
- 3,006
- 20
- 38
How was I wong? lol
I admitted I thought there was a violation, what more do you want? I simply pointed out that there was more than just 1 violation committed in that sequence. 2 of which you choose to ignore. The refs didn't comment on the other 2 violations because they weren't what were in question....of course :0074
Did that blown call cost them the game? I just don't get why people are acting like that call cost them the game!
If you ask someone if they'd rather have a offensive foul called and time to setup a play or a 2 on 1 fast break to win the game....500 million people would tell you the 2 on 1 fast break.
That ending was a WWE worthy clusterf**k.
Plenty of fault on both sides...Ginobilli was off sides while crowding in bounder, a fan was holding Adams, Vegas called a favor?
Either you were on right side or wrong side of that BS.....
Hard to bet NBA with 3 refs wearing blindfolds or calling phantom fouls or not.....
San Ant is now -240 to take the series...:0074
Plenty of fault on both sides...Ginobilli was off sides while crowding in bounder, a fan was holding Adams, Vegas called a favor?
Either you were on right side or wrong side of that BS.....
Hard to bet NBA with 3 refs wearing blindfolds or calling phantom fouls or not.....
San Ant is now -240 to take the series...:0074
- Aug 11, 2011
- 1,174
- 10
- 38
i don't see why you would assume that.. i was just saying I don't think there was any malicious intent on the woman's part. I agree with you that the Spurs still eventually got there chance with the 2 on 1 break and didn't execute. calm down and grab yourself a snickers..
- Aug 11, 2011
- 1,174
- 10
- 38
actually i don't know what to think.. I at first thought she had left her feet. but those aren't her feet in the air. Maybe there was some intent. either way why waste time arguing over these "entertainment shows".. sports have been dead for a while now :sadwave:
