Haskell and Ebert: Farenheit 911 Part II

Eddie Haskell

Matt 02-12-11
Forum Member
Feb 13, 2001
4,595
41
0
25
Cincinnati
aclu.org
Saw Farenheit 911 last night and offer the following review:

Emotionally charged: As many of you know, I am pre-disposed anti-Bush. I admit I loathe this man as he represents many things I despise in this country, ie: silver spoon/lucky sperm club; cowboy approach to problem resolution; distrust of intellectuals (the shear irony of that one continues to floor me); frat boy, party animal turned pseudo-Christian; professes a belief in country but avoids fighting for same; accepted at Yale due to family, power and money not ability (thereby keeping someone deserving out).

With that stated how objective can I be? Let me try. During parts of the film, especially, the scenes of burnt American soldiers and the dead Iraqi little girl, I got pretty emotional (Big Ed does not want to admit he cryed but, maybe a little teary eyed). The reason for my emotion was my belief that we invaded that country under false pretense and that many thousands, let me repeat that, THOUSANDS, of lives have been lost for no valid reason.

I mean, intellectually I know that soldiers and civilians are killed and injured but when the screen brings it too life, it really impacts you. That is unless you are like Ctown, Pro, and others on this board who remind me of that American soldier who seemed to take a lot of pleasure singing that rap song (I wish I knew the name of it) "...burn mother ****er, burn...".

To give that soldier in the film the benefit of the doubt, maybe the horrors he witnessed were of such a nature that this was his only way of coping with what he was seeing and doing. Much like that guy in the movie Platoon who looked forward to killing "gooks".

Factual and Accurate. I don't know. When the US invaded Iraq in March, 2003, the stated reason was failure to comply with UN resolutions (although the UN did not sanction the invasion) and weapons of mass destruction. At that time, I was against invasion as I did not see enough evidence of WMD, but took a wait and see attitude.

I should have been stronger in my convictions and insisted on more evidence. But, like an idiot, I trusted my leaders. God help me, I'm in the same catagory as Britney Spears. In the movie, she supports Bush saying we should stand behind him and trust what he says is the truth. That says it all.

With that said, I will reserve any opinions about the accuracy of the family connections between the Bush family and the Bin Laden family until further evidence comes out (if ever). I mean obviously, Moore does not like Bush. But does that mean what he says should not be taken seriously or at least further inquiry made?

It wouldn't surprise me the the Bush's and the Bin Ladens were in bed together. No more so than the Buffetts, Bushes, Biltmores, Ballmers and Bin Ladens (maybe I should change my name to Baskell). I believe money hangs with money no matter what the nationality. Its a cozy club.

By that do I think Bush had anything to do with 9-11. Absolutely not, I think any implication in this film that 9-11 could have been prevented by Bush is false. I believe 9-11 would have happened under anyones watch as we live (or used to) in a free society. Bush's 42 vacation days between January 2001 and September 11, 2001 does not bother me either as such is typical of a republican president who believes in less government and more business.

Overall, I thought it was an excellent film. You will see and hear ideas, opinions and implications that you will not hear on talk radio, Fox (sic) News, Limbaugh, the Cincinnati Enquirer, Hannity and Combs, Bill Cunningham, and the rest of the liberal media. For that very reason it is worthwhile seeing. The marine at the end was impressive when he said he would not go back to Iraq to kill "... other poor people." Very true, in my opinion.

One of the most gripping scenes in the movie, that cannot be argued by anyone was when the mother of the dead American soldier was in DC, in front of the White House and stopped and spoke with the Afghan or Iraqi woman sitting there with the protest signs calling Bush a terrorist, etc. Then this very Republican type woman walks up to both of them and says:

"This is staged."

The American mother whose son was killed in Iraq tells her that her son was killed and this horrible person says "Where?" The mom tells her and thats the end of the scene with the scumball walking away somehow, someway, rationalizing her utter stupidity. Good God what is wrong with people.

Unfortuneatly, I believe many Americans are like this horrible woman. They hop behind the flag, Bush and apple pie, looking at the world through whatever glasses this administration hands them, accepts as gospel whatever this administration tells them and does believes that the US can commit no wrong.

I'm also tired of those on this board, as well as the Bush administration, who say "we make mistakes". They only pay lip service to the mistakes. They take NO responsiblity for the mistake. This man must not be re-elected. The movie reinforced my belief that Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Powell, Wolfiwitz and Pearl should be tried by a world court for war crimes and crimes against humanity.

After seeing this movie, it reinforced my current embarrasement to be an American. To think that this administration could in 1 1/2 years turn the worlds sympathy towards this country 180 degrees against us so that we are viewed, and are in actuality, aggressive, tryrannical, murdering invaders for no reason.

And throughout all of this, Osama Bin Laden is laughing. The guy who doesnt trust intellectuals played right into the hands of the perpetrator of 9-11. Had Bush not insisted on a tie in between Iraq and 9-11, Osama would be dead or captured. The reality is that Bush and his frieds cannot profit by wiping out AlQuida. They could profit, and will profit by destroying (and rebuilding) another country (Halliburton, oil and energy).

We have been duped. Real, true, patriotic Americans know this. Non-thinking, un-patriotic, scarry Americans do not. I know Kerry aint the greatest thing since sliced bread but my God people, look, really look at whats in there now. He must be removed.

I can listen to Limbaugh and watch Fox. It's tough but I can. For those of you unwilling to see this flick under the trumped up reason that you do not want to support Michael Moore, fine. If you refuse to even look at questions raised about this administration, you are already lost. You don't have to agree with it but you can at least expose yourself to different ideas.

Remember the old saying "knowledge is power." Conversely, may I suggest that lack of knowledge is lack of power. What is more American to blindly follow your leaders without question under the guise of patriotism or to question and insist on answers to situations that at the very least raise the appearance of impropriety. This administration owes us some answers. Remember, they work for us.

So far the only real criticism I've heard about the movie is that Michael Moore is fat. I won't argue with that. I guess at this point its whether you believe the rich Bush family or the son of a Flint autoworker. I kinda like the underdogs. I mean what does he have to gain by exposing Bush and what does Bush have to protect.

We all know the answer to that question.

Eddie
 

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
Good review, Haskell. I'll chime in later with some thoughts on the movie. (Sorry Pro, DTB, Ctown, Freeze and the like...you're gonna have to wait for a few hours...stay on the edge of your seats)
 

Penguinfan

Thread banned
Forum Member
Dec 5, 2001
10,393
190
0
Vanished into vortex
Here's a thought

Here's a thought

Let's try to keep this thread an honest debate instead of the usual downward spiral these type of threads turn into, both sides play nice now......

Unfortuneatly, I believe many Americans are like this horrible woman. They hop behind the flag, Bush and apple pie, looking at the world through whatever glasses this administration hands them, accepts as gospel whatever this administration tells them and does believes that the US can commit no wrong.

You raise a good point there Edward and the entire post was worth reading for that alone, as a lifelong Republican I am ashamed of the current asministration and question it's motives, tactics and resluts (or lack there of). I said it in another thread, the Democrats should all be hanged, the current administration is lobbing them a softball this November and the best they can come up with is Kerry? For god sake give us something to vote for besides Bush if you really want the White House this fall, Eddie, blame your own party for this mistake. The Republicans are leaving the door open and the Dems refuse to walk through it, admit it.

I'm also tired of those on this board, as well as the Bush administration, who say "we make mistakes". They only pay lip service to the mistakes. They take NO responsiblity for the mistake

This is why I will not vote in November, I can't bring myself to vote for Kerry and in no way shape or form will I vote for Bush again, though I will stop just short of calling him a criminal. Guilty of being a politician in the worst degree, yes, a criminal, well I don't know.

The reality is that Bush and his frieds cannot profit by wiping out AlQuida. They could profit, and will profit by destroying (and rebuilding) another country (Halliburton, oil and energy).

It is time for the Republicans of the country to see this and face the facts, that much I will give you. The absolute worst thing any politician can do is make decisions that benefit himself while harming the people they represent, the absolute worst. He was elected to SERVE the people of the country and make hard decisions that benfit the people, not his own bank account. IMO this is the big problem with all gov't today, last night here in PA the slots issue drug on till after midnight, if you think the problem was weather or not to legalize slots your dead wrong, the problem was an ammendment that prohibited elected officials to have a personal financial issue in gaming, ARE YOU KIDDING ME. The whole idea behind legalizing slots here was tax relief, which everyone was for, now the politicians are only for it if they can personally benefit from it, sad, sad day in our country for sure.

After seeing this movie, it reinforced my current embarrasement to be an American. To think that this administration could in 1 1/2 years turn the worlds sympathy towards this country 180 degrees against us so that we are viewed, and are in actuality, aggressive, tryrannical, murdering invaders for no reason.

Again this may be a bigger problem than most people realize, the majority of the world hates us for no reason already, why give them a legitimate one.

For those of you unwilling to see this flick under the trumped up reason that you do not want to support Michael Moore, fine.

If Kenneth Starr made a movie revealing his interpretation of the truth would you rush out to see it?

I think a film like this does more harm than good because we don't, and will never know the truth and I don't think anyone's vote will be swayed by it, none. You were anti-Bush going in and are now, the anti-Moore people are still just that, the only purpose this movie serves was to make money for Moore, cleaverly disguised as a documentary in an election year, aren't these the kind of misleading, only for profit, self serving things you are accusing the Bush administration of. Granted Moore's film will probably not end up killing thousands of people for the good of nobody, but you get my point.

Take care Edward

I think I will vote this fall after all and write in John McCain

Penguinfan
 

Eddie Haskell

Matt 02-12-11
Forum Member
Feb 13, 2001
4,595
41
0
25
Cincinnati
aclu.org
PF:

Want to raise a few points. I agree that many times I am at the very least guilty of participating if not causing the downward spiral of a thread with name calling. Generally, its my method of shortening my take on things. In other words, calling Dr. Freeze a moron (universally accepted truth) is easier and shorter than explaining why he is a moron.

Although I do have facts to back up such name calling, time and energy prevent me from generally doing so. The same with Dogs. He ad nauseum posts links to sites that support his position. We can all do that. Everyone of us on this board knows that there are always at least two sides to every issue. Give it up, please.

Secondly, you identified me as a democrat. That is incorrect. Although I jokingly refer to myself as a moderate or centrist, there really is some truth to that statement. Of anyone on the political scene for president, I like you, would vote for McCain. A little honesty and getting to the root of the problem (campaign contributions) would be refreshing.

For Dogs and Gardenweasel, McCain is a proponent of tort reform. Yet I would still vote for him. Now how does that concept fit into your preconceived notions about greedy old Eddie the ambulance chaser. Certain problems are greater than my wallet and the idea of buying elections (my neighbor Carl Lindner is a major purchaser of politicians) and supporting the same with bogus rationale (Mitch McConnell first amendment argument) has to stop.

Yeah, that applies to trial lawyers and unions too. Thirdly, I too wish the democrats could have put up a stronger candidate. I don't know how Kerry will do but, he can't I mean can't be worse than this guy. I said it before and I will say it again. George Walker Bush is the worst president this country has ever had.

I mean think about AlQueda. If we had concentrated our military and intelligence efforts on finding and convicting the invaders of the United States instead of putting our resources to a granted bad regime, how could Bush profit. He couldn't. Al Quida does not have oil, you cannot run a pipeline through the country of Al Quida nor can you rebuild the country of Al Quida with private contractors after you destroy it.

It was easier to convince the American people to wage war against a solid and identifiable target (Iraq and Hussein) from which your family and corporate america could profit than it was to wage war against a mysterious and illusive target (Bin Laden and Al Quida) with no identifiable country from which you and your base could not profit from. Bush will have a problem with this come November.

Again, other than saying f*** the rest of the world, how can the conservatives argue with the complete world opinion reversal which occurred in the last 1 1/2 years. I mean are most of you so arrogant and myopic that what maybe 50 million people believe is right is in fact right. About 7 Billion disagree with you.

If Ken Starr made a film about his investigation and prosecution of the Clintons on Whitewater, I would go out and see it. This guy is no dumb lawyer from Chicago. He knows what he is doing. Spending some 50 million and finding only a bj is rather revealing. If there was something else out there I'm sure, repeat sure, he would have found it.

I would like to see the extent of his investigation into Whitewater. This guy was meticulous and a plodder. I'd love to see it. I think it would support my position that Clinton was hated so intensely by many Republicans that they went all out to bust him. Frankly, I don't think any of us could have withstood such inquiry.

Lastly, the major aspect of the movie that concerns me is that if Moores comments, statements and positions of MAJOR points proves untrue or taken out of context, then I think he will hurt the very cause (defeat of Bush) which he is trying to accomplish. Like the 60's anti-war stuff, many voters on the fence went with Nixon instead of McGovern because the hippies were associated with McGovern.

Bush is defeatable as is. We don't need to give the right some reasons to distract the fence voters from Bush's criminal record by letting them argue that Moore is a whack job spreading lies. Much of what he says is true. I just hope the controversial stuff does not prove to be out of context or false.

Although I know many of you disagree with my points and positions on various issues but I appreciate your comments, Channie, Pengy and of course the man of few words but lots of smilies, Freelance. Really, I am kind of a moderate. As Kosar pointed out many threads ago I take a lot of what most would think of as traditional republican positions on many issues, including abortion, taxes, affirmative action, etc.

Happy Fourth.

Ed
 

buddy

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 21, 2000
10,897
85
0
Pittsburgh, Pa.
is


Lest we forget.
 

UGA12

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 7, 2003
7,774
108
63
Between The Hedges
So Bush was in bed with the Bin Ladens, he attacked Afganastan to set up an oit line, add to this he knew and could have prevented 9/11 :shocked: I guess this film also reveals where Elvis currently resides, plus the lost Hollywood footage of the moon landing (because we all know we really did land on it). :142lmao: Has the president done some things wrong sure he has, just as every other president has in the past and will in the future. Debating what a pres. has done in reaction to the worst attack on the U.S in history is understandable, but when you start giving credit to movies full of LIES and AGENDAS just because you do not like Bush then that is sad.
 

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
UGA12 said:
So Bush was in bed with the Bin Ladens, he attacked Afganastan to set up an oit line, add to this he knew and could have prevented 9/11. Has the president done some things wrong sure he has, just as every other president has in the past and will in the future. Debating what a pres. has done in reaction to the worst attack on the U.S in history is understandable, but when you start giving credit to movies full of LIES and AGENDAS just because you do not like Bush then that is sad.

Apparently you haven't bothered to see the movie. That's great, but maybe you should refrain from misrepresenting/exaggerating what is in the movie. Talk about lies and agenda:

Nothing in the movie suggested that Bush knew about, or could have prevented 9/11. Lie # 1.

Nothing in the movie suggested that we attacked Afghanistan to build an oil line. What was suggested is that he was working with elements of the Taliban, pre 9/11, to work out an agreement for an oil line. Lie #2

Nothing in the movie accused him of being in bed with the Bin Ladens. It accuses the Bush family of historically being in bed with Saudi oil interests. I think that can be safely said is a fact. Lie # 3

3 statements, 3 lies.
 

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
Good post, PF.

Here are a few random thoughts on the movie:

The scene where he shows Iraqi kids flying kites and playing on the jungle gym right before footage of bombing was cheap and manipulative.

He made a bigger deal out of Bush freezing(reading My Pet Goat) for 7 minutes after he learned of the second tower being hit than maybe should have. I guess a case could be made that those 7 minutes could have been crucial in shooting down the plane that hit the Pentagon, but i'm not all that sold on that one.

One of the so-called 'cheap shots' that really does illuminate Bush'ss mindset is when at a formal dinner Bush addresses the large group with 'i'd like to welcome the haves and the have mores here tonight. People call you the elite, I call you my base.' I believe that was the same dinner where he made a joke about not finding WMD.

The James Bath connection was very interesting. (see the movie if you don't know what i'm talking about)

The pedigree and backround of the newly installed Afghan government was very interesting. (ditto)

I agree with Haskell that the footage of charred, maimed, bloody, disfigured soldiers, Iraqi civilians of all ages and sexes, was very effective. Granted, in any sort of war situation you could find this sort of thing, but it does hit a little closer to home when you see what our 'liberal' press won't show us. It's especially more striking when you consider that there is not one good reason that this has to happen.

The make-up sequence was ineffective, a waste of five minutes and used for an unnecessary cheap laugh.

The opening sequence of how Bush stole the election seemed weak and kind of out of context. I don't think it lent much to keeping the narrative tightly focused.

The sequence of how our media really served as cheerleaders before the invasion, during the invasion and for a while after the invasion should remind us that every single news organization rallied around the occupation. The media very, very rarely even questioned wtf we were doing. Some people remember that very well, but others seem to have forgotten and continue on with their silly rants about the 'liberal' media and how everything is so negative. Wrong. All we saw for months was positive news. It's only when there was no positive news to report that there became a dearth of it. Imagine that.

The final scene might have been a cheap shot (won't get fooled again), but it was hilarious.

The lady that Haskell refers to questioning the death of the other ladys son was an embarrassment, but I would imagine that many people here would have said the same thing. That the mothers grief was staged. Pathetic.

The extended piece on Flint, it's poverty and the Marine recruiters was ok, but to me it seemed a little off-topic in a way. He kind of got away from the focus of Bush's deception about Iraq and other related issues and slipped into a bit of a rant about poverty in America. It's fairly easy to show a ghetto and make the point that the money wasted could be used there. The problem is that Iraq or no Iraq, that's the very last place any money would go under this admin(or porbably under just about any admin). So to me, that point seems kind of irrelevant. Poorer people will always shoulder a heavier burden in any sort of military action, but the flipside to that is that the military offers and has offered millions of low to middle class people a way out to a better life. And when we go decades between significant actions and people are retiring with a pretty good pension at 38, nobody seems to complain about it.

That said, it *is* sad when our troops die for nothing, as in Iraq and Vietnam, but I don't think social commentary is the point there. It goes beyond that and I think he lost his focus again with that.

The bits on the Carlyle Group are old news to some/most, but possibly important to understand the motives to certain actions.

That's all I can think of off the top of my head.

Furthering one of Haskells points, i'd like to ask a question. While we're constantly peppered with the really obvious point that Arabs want Bush out, i'd like to know who actually believes that Bin Laden wasn't very relieved when we diverted attention from him and focused on Iraq. The day that he learned that we were going to invade Iraq was probably his best day since 9/11.
 
Last edited:

UGA12

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 7, 2003
7,774
108
63
Between The Hedges
[/QUOTE]With that said, I will reserve any opinions about the accuracy of the family connections between the Bush family and the Bin Laden family until further evidence comes out (if ever). I mean obviously, Moore does not like Bush. But does that mean what he says should not be taken seriously or at least further inquiry made?

It wouldn't surprise me the the Bush's and the Bin Ladens were in bed together. No more so than the Buffetts, Bushes, Biltmores, Ballmers and Bin Ladens (maybe I should change my name to Baskell). I believe money hangs with money no matter what the nationality. Its a cozy club.

By that do I think Bush had anything to do with 9-11. Absolutely not, I think any implication in this film that 9-11 could have been prevented by Bush is false. I believe 9-11 would have happened under anyones watch as we live (or used to) in a free society. Bush's 42 vacation days between January 2001 and September 11, 2001 does not bother me either as such is typical of a republican president who believes in less government and more business.
I was simply replying to what Eddie had in his post. He has obviously seen the movie and those are his words. I am sure though if Rush released a film with all his crackpipe theories you would be defending him and his movie, didnt think so.
 

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
UGA12 said:
With that said, I will reserve any opinions about the accuracy of the family connections between the Bush family and the Bin Laden family until further evidence comes out (if ever). I mean obviously, Moore does not like Bush. But does that mean what he says should not be taken seriously or at least further inquiry made?

It wouldn't surprise me the the Bush's and the Bin Ladens were in bed together. No more so than the Buffetts, Bushes, Biltmores, Ballmers and Bin Ladens (maybe I should change my name to Baskell). I believe money hangs with money no matter what the nationality. Its a cozy club.

By that do I think Bush had anything to do with 9-11. Absolutely not, I think any implication in this film that 9-11 could have been prevented by Bush is false. I believe 9-11 would have happened under anyones watch as we live (or used to) in a free society. Bush's 42 vacation days between January 2001 and September 11, 2001 does not bother me either as such is typical of a republican president who believes in less government and more business.

I was simply replying to what Eddie had in his post. He has obviously seen the movie and those are his words. I am sure though if Rush released a film with all his crackpipe theories you would be defending him and his movie, didnt think so.


Haskell didn't say anything about the film regarding 'attacking Afghanistan for a pipeline.' Where did you come up with that one?

There were no implications in the film that Bush knew about or could have prevented 9/11. Haskells comment addresses people that might somehow try to tie certain Bin Laden family members involvement in the Saudi oil industry to 9/11. Moore does not try to do this as it is absurd.

Along the same lines, the film implicates Bush, his family, his long-time friends as being in bed with the Saudi oil industry for the last 30 years or so. Certain Bin Ladens also are in bed with the same interests. There was never any attempt to tie Bush to Osama Bin Laden or Bush to 9/11.

You mis-interpreted and made leaps about two of Haskells comments and totally made up another one.

Would I defend a Rush movie? Who knows, but I sure would go see it and refute whatever I thought I could if I didn't agree with it. I sure wouldn't comment or cast aspersions like calling his thoughts in his movie 'crackpipe theories' if I hadn't even seen it.
 

homedog

I'm trite!
Forum Member
Jan 5, 2002
3,884
65
48
Posted by Kosar
There were no implications in the film that Bush knew about or could have prevented 9/11. Haskells comment addresses people that might somehow try to tie certain Bin Laden family members involvement in the Saudi oil industry to 9/11. Moore does not try to do this as it is absurd.

There was never any attempt to tie Bush to Osama Bin Laden

Posted by Edward
With that said, I will reserve any opinions about the accuracy of the family connections between the Bush family and the Bin Laden family until further evidence comes out (if ever). I mean obviously, Moore does not like Bush. But does that mean what he says should not be taken seriously or at least further inquiry made?

Which one is correct :shrug:
 

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
They're both correct. Moore showed, or tried to show, that a few members of the Bin Laden family profited with Saudi oil, just like members of the Bush family.

This is different than trying to tie Bush to OSAMA Bin Laden and 9/11.
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
Eddie and Kosar thanks for the honest and accurate reviews. I have seen the film twice and come away with the same thoughts as you.
 

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
Stevie,

It's no surprise that centrists like Haskell, you and myself would have similar thoughts about the movie.
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
It's all about a open mind. When you listen to Rush and Ann Dickhead everyday your mind becomes. Well half shut down. The real world flies by. There is a way of life for some that is. You march a certain way and that's it. Believe a certain way or get out of our club. You cant go in the middle. This is what happen to Germaine's youth in the 30's. Thank god we still have many folks here in the USA that have guts to think on there own.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top