being in 2nd currently, i imagine if win stay there (at minimum) or possibly take first, if that person falters; that right? so if you pick a winner, you 'should' at least get 2500 (?)<barring too,="" any="" way="" that="" a="" lower="" ranked="" player="" could="" jump="" up,tie="" you="" for="" 2nd="">
so really you have 50/50 chance of 2500 payout.
if you buy down to 7 with GB - which is probably the biggest line difference that i saw (on baord, not knowing lines your poll using)... you're actually getting yourself 4 points (thanks to hook, even though the push cancels/loses)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
if you can afford to take/risk $560 at -7 (-140 roughly) would win you $400 if detroit fails to stay within 10 of GB.
i dont know if thats in/around what you'd be happy with getting. i mean, you made this far in pool, would prolly like to think to have a bigger payday for all time, effort, -something more to show for if you will- even though thinking like that is greedy, and usually doesnt work well.
if gb fails to cover 7 you'd be 2500-560=1940 - so if you'd rather try and guarantee a higher 'payout middle' you could simply increase your wager on GB, thusly lowering your 'no cover' payout.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
the close middle, at gb-7 at 140 would be taking / risking $1435 to win $1025 on GB
if detroit stays inside of 7 at the number, you would lose 1435 from 2500 resulting in 1065
so you either take home
1025 (if gb wins by 11 or more)
1065 (detroit loses by less than 7)
2500 (if gb wins by 7 exactly)- so long as pushes cancel
3525 (if gb wins by 8,9 or 10)
thats all surmising that you dont gain any ground on leader(s) (assuming stands pat, wins). if you catapult into first place, obviously payout becomes heavier, and hedge risk is in theory 'cut in half'</barring>