Hedging ???

[dez]

Alright. The cavs have made it to the finals and at least its going to be a more interesting finals then San An vs DET. :SIB

Need some valuable input here. Took the Cavs to win the championship at 25-1 when they were down 1-0 in the series vs Det. They played more units at 20-1 to win the championship when they were down 2-1.
Now if I were to hedge on San An at -500 would that make any sense and if so how much should be hedged ??? :shrug:

Or should I just let it ride and hope the Cavs can do it and get 45 units ?:142smilie Thanks !

 

[ELVIS]

i see the clev bet as dead money, so i would bet SA.

not trying 2 b a Dick, but the cavs are so overmatched. i think back to philly vs the lakers. jmo

 

[jasperjones]

i am always in favor of getting something back... the -500 ML for the series is stiff though. 10 units to insure you get back your original wager is hard to swallow. (though the upside would be 35 unit win if the cavs pulled it off)

or you could just bet each game individually on the spurs to win.

take game one spurs ML.... if they win great you are making money....if the cavs win you can then find a better series price for the spurs to win. (it will no longer be -500 or -470)

just a thought

 

[dez]

Great idea actually. Probably better value for San An $ line although its still high at -380.:com:

 

[jasperjones]

you could also wait a few games.... see how goes... then start betting after game two... when the spurs ML will come down when they arrive in Ohio.

 

[jasperjones]

what did you wind up doing? just curious