these are the top 5 picks:
kc---62-21 or 75%
buff-46-18 or 72%
jets-45-28 or 62%
jax--39-35 or 53%
wash-27-12 or 69%
jets and jax % inconsistent with their rankings.
good news:
top 12 consensus:
jax-7-1
kc--5-1
giants-5-1
bad news:
bottom 12 consensus:
jets-6-2
tampa-5-0
and the worst news (for me)
top 12:
carol-4-0
bottom 12:
n.e.-4-0
so, my interpretation of these numbers, in no particular order, are as follows:
jax-consensus pick,conf. by top 12
kc--#1 consensus pick, conf. by top 12 and confirmed by bottom 12!!! best bet #1.
buff-consensus pick, top 12, 3-1
wash-at 69% consensus pick, top 12 and bottom 12 split
carol-best bet #2-top and bottom 12
consensus pro/con.
phil-by default
oak-by default
lost in america brought up the point that tampa had a 83% pro/con. however, only 29 picked tampa, which included the bottom 12 at 5-0. the top 12 were 1-1. i still think this is a "don't touch" game, as jets/oak.
pep
kc---62-21 or 75%
buff-46-18 or 72%
jets-45-28 or 62%
jax--39-35 or 53%
wash-27-12 or 69%
jets and jax % inconsistent with their rankings.
good news:
top 12 consensus:
jax-7-1
kc--5-1
giants-5-1
bad news:
bottom 12 consensus:
jets-6-2
tampa-5-0
and the worst news (for me)
top 12:
carol-4-0
bottom 12:
n.e.-4-0
so, my interpretation of these numbers, in no particular order, are as follows:
jax-consensus pick,conf. by top 12
kc--#1 consensus pick, conf. by top 12 and confirmed by bottom 12!!! best bet #1.
buff-consensus pick, top 12, 3-1
wash-at 69% consensus pick, top 12 and bottom 12 split
carol-best bet #2-top and bottom 12
consensus pro/con.
phil-by default
oak-by default
lost in america brought up the point that tampa had a 83% pro/con. however, only 29 picked tampa, which included the bottom 12 at 5-0. the top 12 were 1-1. i still think this is a "don't touch" game, as jets/oak.
pep
