80%s 10-7 59%
70%s 21-20-2 51%
Overall 31-27-2 53%
Atl +4.5 83%
Det +3.5 83%
KC +1.5 78%
SF -3.5 74%
70%s 21-20-2 51%
Overall 31-27-2 53%
Atl +4.5 83%
Det +3.5 83%
KC +1.5 78%
SF -3.5 74%
HILTON Week 14
- Thread starter Palmetto Pimp
- Start date
hmm, i still can't get the updated page.
anyway, i think culpepper was a probable when they picked. now it is rookie vs. rookie, both in their "second" official game. not for me. this could be scoring festival.
atl +4 seems like the 'cappers choice.
kc pick'em last time i saw. still....
sf is a very logical play.
i am surprised, as i expected dallas or pitt in one of the top spots.
pep
anyway, i think culpepper was a probable when they picked. now it is rookie vs. rookie, both in their "second" official game. not for me. this could be scoring festival.
atl +4 seems like the 'cappers choice.
kc pick'em last time i saw. still....
sf is a very logical play.
i am surprised, as i expected dallas or pitt in one of the top spots.
pep
So pepin you dont think they wouldve liked Det as much if they knew Bouman was startin???
http://www.thelogicalapproach.com/handicapping_contests_2001.htm
http://www.thelogicalapproach.com/handicapping_contests_2001.htm
man, that is a lot of info, but very interesting. i am having it printed so i can kind of digest it.
i still don't see the point in the reference to minny/detroit.
i'm back from looking at it. the sunset station contest looks the most meaningful in looking for consensus. atlanta, kc, and s.f. seem to be hammered the most.
only one chose to get involved in the minny/detroit, choosing minny. this is kind of in line with my thinking of avoiding this game.
the hilton guys confirm atlanta and kc at 4-0 and s.f. at 3-0. from memory, the non- dissenting picks are the strongest.
i was really not that comitted to s.f., but will have to compare now to see how they rate with my other picks. n.e. is not a popular pick, but i can't let it slide. i still think they are cheap, but imagine if they had come in at what i consider to be the "fair" line of -9. it would have been 95-5 buffalo.
thanks,
pep
i still don't see the point in the reference to minny/detroit.
i'm back from looking at it. the sunset station contest looks the most meaningful in looking for consensus. atlanta, kc, and s.f. seem to be hammered the most.
only one chose to get involved in the minny/detroit, choosing minny. this is kind of in line with my thinking of avoiding this game.
the hilton guys confirm atlanta and kc at 4-0 and s.f. at 3-0. from memory, the non- dissenting picks are the strongest.
i was really not that comitted to s.f., but will have to compare now to see how they rate with my other picks. n.e. is not a popular pick, but i can't let it slide. i still think they are cheap, but imagine if they had come in at what i consider to be the "fair" line of -9. it would have been 95-5 buffalo.
thanks,
pep
Dam that's lots of stuff for a old guy to read on a Saturday night. Thanks I shall do that. Very interesting. Pep your getting older to. Hows your eyes.
That site belongs to Andy Iskoe.
I've met him a few times and worked with his dad at Treasure Island Hotel/Casino (RaceBook) here in Vegas , both him and his dad "Murray" play the Hilton Contest
Andys picks this week:
SUNSET CONTEST :
JETS/BENGALS UNDER 34.5
SAINTS + 6
Jags + 2.5
EAGLES -2.5
JAGS/BROWNS UNDER 36.5
BEST BET: My CHEFS !! wooohoooo
I've met him a few times and worked with his dad at Treasure Island Hotel/Casino (RaceBook) here in Vegas , both him and his dad "Murray" play the Hilton Contest
Andys picks this week:
SUNSET CONTEST :
JETS/BENGALS UNDER 34.5
SAINTS + 6
Jags + 2.5
EAGLES -2.5
JAGS/BROWNS UNDER 36.5
BEST BET: My CHEFS !! wooohoooo
