How much will you pledge?

[Cricket]

If I got this two page letter from Biden,I was just wondering what Madjacks left wing democratic squawkers were sending in when they got theirs. I think the grifter should use his own cash. He's fleeced enough pockets in his day.
This was last paragraph.

Please be generous:jerkit:

 

[WhatsHisNuts]

Is political party fundraising a new concept to you?

 

[yyz]

Is political party fundraising a new concept to you?

Well, he is a communist.

 

[Cricket]

Couple squawkers chiming in like gulls fighting for fries in the Mcdonald's parking lot.

 

[yyz]

Nope. Just squawking in hope that you'll eventually pull your head outta yer ass!

:0074

 

[Cricket]

Nope. Just squawking in hope that you'll eventually pull your head outta yer ass!

:0074

You've been in that darkness for a long time. :moon:

:0051

 

[WhatsHisNuts]

Cricket: I asked you a question. Is this new to you? You seem to be really surprised.

I never donated until Trump ran and I felt keeping him out was worth my support. Now I donate to campaigns that are challenging Republicans I hate.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[yyz]

You've been in that darkness for a long time. :moon:

:0051

I get it. You're hopeless.

 

[Cricket]

Cricket: I asked you a question. Is this new to you? You seem to be really surprised.

I never donated until Trump ran and I felt keeping him out was worth my support. Now I donate to campaigns that are challenging Republicans I hate.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Just asking questions (also known as JAQing off) is a way of attempting to make wild accusations acceptable (and hopefully not legally actionable) by framing them as questions rather than statements. It shifts the burden of proof to one's opponent; rather than laboriously having to prove that all politicians are reptoid scum, one can pull out one single odd piece of evidence and force the opponent to explain why the evidence is wrong.

 

[yyz]

Just asking questions (also known as JAQing off) is a way of attempting to make wild accusations acceptable (and hopefully not legally actionable) by framing them as questions rather than statements. It shifts the burden of proof to one's opponent; rather than laboriously having to prove that all politicians are reptoid scum, one can pull out one single odd piece of evidence and force the opponent to explain why the evidence is wrong.

:mj07:

Another canned response. You simply can't do any thinking on your own.

:mj07:

 

[Skulnik]

Cricket: I asked you a question. Is this new to you? You seem to be really surprised.

I never donated until Trump ran and I felt keeping him out was worth my support. Now I donate to campaigns that are challenging Republicans I hate.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You should've saved your money, they Cheated to deny Trump his second term.

Think about it, old Joe probably got 10% since he's the "Big Guy".


:mj07::mj07::mj07:

:00x13:00x13:00x13:00x13:00x13:00x13:00x13:00x13:00x13

 

[yyz]

You should've saved your money, they Cheated to deny Trump his second term.

Think about it, old Joe probably got 10% since he's the "Big Guy".


:mj07::mj07::mj07:

:00x13:00x13:00x13:00x13:00x13:00x13:00x13:00x13:00x13

Remember, they not only cheated, but covered up every scrap of evidence. The greatest trick ever.

 

[WhatsHisNuts]

Just asking questions (also known as JAQing off) is a way of attempting to make wild accusations acceptable (and hopefully not legally actionable) by framing them as questions rather than statements. It shifts the burden of proof to one's opponent; rather than laboriously having to prove that all politicians are reptoid scum, one can pull out one single odd piece of evidence and force the opponent to explain why the evidence is wrong.

I answered the original question in the quoted response, so that makes your response foolish. Also, I didn't ask for evidence or to explain evidence, I was asking what should be a rhetorical question. You're almost 70 years old and you seem befuddled by a fundraising letter......of which most people see at least 50 of during an election year.

 

[Cricket]

I answered the original question in the quoted response, so that makes your response foolish. Also, I didn't ask for evidence or to explain evidence, I was asking what should be a rhetorical question. You're almost 70 years old and you seem befuddled by a fundraising letter......of which most people see at least 50 of during an election year.

Answer my question piss pot. How much are you giving?
Man you're a humorless bitch.

 

[WhatsHisNuts]

Answer my question piss pot. How much are you giving?
Man you're a humorless bitch.

I'll give $50. I think we've found the problem. You think you're funny, but you just come off as a complete dipshit. Maybe if you go drink some piss, things will clear up.

 

[zig]

You should've saved your money, they Cheated to deny Trump his second term.

Think about it, old Joe probably got 10% since he's the "Big Guy".


:mj07::mj07::mj07:

:00x13:00x13:00x13:00x13:00x13:00x13:00x13:00x13:00x13

Skulnik got Fcked in the ass. You poor stupid Mother Fer! 😆

 

[yyz]

Answer my question piss pot. How much are you giving?
Man you're a humorless bitch.

Just asking questions (also known as JAQing off) is a way of attempting to make wild accusations acceptable (and hopefully not legally actionable) by framing them as questions rather than statements. It shifts the burden of proof to one's opponent; rather than laboriously having to prove that all politicians are reptoid scum, one can pull out one single odd piece of evidence and force the opponent to explain why the evidence is wrong.

:0002

 

[WhatsHisNuts]

Just asking questions (also known as JAQing off) is a way of attempting to make wild accusations acceptable (and hopefully not legally actionable) by framing them as questions rather than statements. It shifts the burden of proof to one's opponent; rather than laboriously having to prove that all politicians are reptoid scum, one can pull out one single odd piece of evidence and force the opponent to explain why the evidence is wrong.

BTW: The explanation above (that you aren't citing) is often used to explain Tucker Carlson's tactic.

 

[Cricket]

BTW: The explanation above (that you aren't citing) is often used to explain Tucker Carlson's tactic.

It's from Prickopedia. Aren't you a contributer?

 

[WhatsHisNuts]

It's from Prickopedia. Aren't you a contributer?

Another humor attempt fail. If Prickopedia existed it would be a collection of pricks. If I was a contributor, I would be adding names to the collection, not a subject.