THE NO KINGS ACT
S.4973 — 118th Congress (2023-2024) ---(1) no person, including any President, is above the law;--the Constitution of the United States does not grant to any President any form of immunity (whether absolute, presumptive, or otherwise) from criminal prosecution, including for actions committed while serving as President;--the United States District Court for the District of Columbia correctly concluded in United States v. Trump, No. 23–257 (TSC), 2023 WL 8359833 (D.D.C. December 1, 2023) that “former Presidents do not possess absolute federal criminal immunity for any acts committed while in office”, that former Presidents “may be subject to federal investigation, indictment, prosecution, conviction, and punishment for any criminal acts undertaken while in office”, and that a “four-year service as Commander in Chief [does] not bestow on [a President] the divine right of kings to evade the criminal accountability that governs his fellow citizens”;--- NO IMMUNITY.—A President, former President, Vice President, or former Vice President shall not be entitled to any form of immunity (whether absolute, presumptive, or otherwise) from criminal prosecution for alleged violations of the criminal laws of the United States --Rule of construction.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to immunize a President, former President, Vice President, or former Vice President from criminal prosecution for alleged violations of the criminal laws of the States.--
The Supreme Court of the United States shall have NOOOOOO appellate jurisdiction, on the basis that an alleged criminal act was within the conclusive or preclusive constitutional authority of a President or Vice President or on the basis that an alleged criminal act was related to the official duties of a President or Vice President, to (or direct another court of the United States to)—dismiss an indictment or any other charging instrument;
(B) grant acquittal or dismiss or otherwise terminate a criminal proceeding;
(C) halt, suspend, disband, or otherwise impede the functions of any grand jury;
(D) grant a motion to suppress or bar evidence or testimony, or otherwise exclude information from a criminal proceeding;
(E) grant a writ of habeas corpus, a writ of coram nobis, a motion to set aside a verdict or judgment, or any other form of post-conviction or collateral relief;
(F) overturn a conviction;
(G) declare a criminal proceeding unconstitutional; or
(H) enjoin or restrain the enforcement or application of a law.
In a civil action under this subsection, a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit shall be final and NOT appealable to the Supreme Court of the United States.
The Supreme Court of the United States shall have no appellate jurisdiction to declare any provision of this Act (including this section) unconstitutional or to bar or restrain the enforcement or application of any provision of this Act (including this section) on the ground of its unconstitutionality.
please guys contact every state gov state senoator the whole cabinet of presdent bide n
This will stop trump from being sworn in
or else be prepared to lose at least $17,000 in next four years higher taxes higher cost of food highers cost of all clothing
yes we get jd vance in but he's a better option
S.4973 — 118th Congress (2023-2024) ---(1) no person, including any President, is above the law;--the Constitution of the United States does not grant to any President any form of immunity (whether absolute, presumptive, or otherwise) from criminal prosecution, including for actions committed while serving as President;--the United States District Court for the District of Columbia correctly concluded in United States v. Trump, No. 23–257 (TSC), 2023 WL 8359833 (D.D.C. December 1, 2023) that “former Presidents do not possess absolute federal criminal immunity for any acts committed while in office”, that former Presidents “may be subject to federal investigation, indictment, prosecution, conviction, and punishment for any criminal acts undertaken while in office”, and that a “four-year service as Commander in Chief [does] not bestow on [a President] the divine right of kings to evade the criminal accountability that governs his fellow citizens”;--- NO IMMUNITY.—A President, former President, Vice President, or former Vice President shall not be entitled to any form of immunity (whether absolute, presumptive, or otherwise) from criminal prosecution for alleged violations of the criminal laws of the United States --Rule of construction.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to immunize a President, former President, Vice President, or former Vice President from criminal prosecution for alleged violations of the criminal laws of the States.--
The Supreme Court of the United States shall have NOOOOOO appellate jurisdiction, on the basis that an alleged criminal act was within the conclusive or preclusive constitutional authority of a President or Vice President or on the basis that an alleged criminal act was related to the official duties of a President or Vice President, to (or direct another court of the United States to)—dismiss an indictment or any other charging instrument;
(B) grant acquittal or dismiss or otherwise terminate a criminal proceeding;
(C) halt, suspend, disband, or otherwise impede the functions of any grand jury;
(D) grant a motion to suppress or bar evidence or testimony, or otherwise exclude information from a criminal proceeding;
(E) grant a writ of habeas corpus, a writ of coram nobis, a motion to set aside a verdict or judgment, or any other form of post-conviction or collateral relief;
(F) overturn a conviction;
(G) declare a criminal proceeding unconstitutional; or
(H) enjoin or restrain the enforcement or application of a law.
In a civil action under this subsection, a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit shall be final and NOT appealable to the Supreme Court of the United States.
The Supreme Court of the United States shall have no appellate jurisdiction to declare any provision of this Act (including this section) unconstitutional or to bar or restrain the enforcement or application of any provision of this Act (including this section) on the ground of its unconstitutionality.
please guys contact every state gov state senoator the whole cabinet of presdent bide n
This will stop trump from being sworn in
or else be prepared to lose at least $17,000 in next four years higher taxes higher cost of food highers cost of all clothing
yes we get jd vance in but he's a better option
